Saturday, December 18, 2021

My talk to the World Freedom Alliance conference in Copenhagen, November 26, 2021

This talk was about:

 a) similarities between the anthrax letters and the COVID pandemic, and 

b) identifying and investigating the obvious perpetrators, the foot soldiers of the cabal to institute a great reset. 

This is a major vulnerability of the cabal.  Shine a spotlight on the perpetrators, and soon the cabal won't have so many of its trusted lieutenants to call on, nor a long list of aspirants for the job... when a rhetorical guillotine might be hanging over their heads.


Anonymous said...

Stunning Covid Data From Denmark Shows Omicron Has Been Used As A Cover For Vaccine Failure!

Stunning Covid data from Denmark
But not for the reason you've been told; the story is vaccine failure, not Omicron!

Alex Berenson

The Danes are now publishing extremely detailed daily data about Covid cases and hospitalizations - not just about Omicron, but all Covid variants.

And, in news that will surprise precisely no one who has been alive the last two years, they paint a picture entirely different than what the media claims.

Omicron - which continues to appear significantly less dangerous though more transmissible than earlier variants of Covid - has been used as a cover for vaccine failure.

Most new Covid cases in Denmark occur in people who are vaccinated or boosted - and that is true for both Omicron and earlier variants. More than 76 percent of non-Omicron Covid infections in Denmark are in vaccinated people, along with about 90 percent of Omicron infections.

Further, only 25 of the 561 people currently hospitalized in Denmark for Covid have the Omicron variant. The Danes do not provide an exact number for patients in intensive care with Omicron, saying only that it is fewer than five.

Perhaps the most stunning fact about Omicron and Denmark is that its rise actually parallels a marked slowdown in the growth of Danish hospitalizations and intensive care patients. Those rose roughly fivefold between mid-October and late November, as the Danes left the happy vaccine valley. Since then they have barely budged, rising about 20 percent.

Danish Covid hospitalizations over the last three months: note that the rise predates Omicron.


Anonymous said...

Have you seen this?

Anonymous said...


A drug more powerful then Ivermectin?

'Artemisinin is one million or one billion times more effective in comparison to Ivermectin?'

Anonymous said...

VACCINATED VARIANT: Only 20% Of Omicron Cases Found In Unvaccinated People, CDC Says. ??? CDC? May it be less?

South Africa: Only 1.7% Hospitalised From Omicron.

Anonymous said...


Moderna's COVID Vaccine '4 Times More Likely To Cause Heart Inflammation Than Pfizer's': Study:

A study published in the British Medical Journal late Thursday suggests Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine is up to four times more likely to cause heart inflammation—myocarditis or myopericarditis—than Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine.

Looks like the Gene Therapy Vaccine Fauci, and the NIH have Patents on may be in trouble?

Anonymous said...

Excellent presentation Dr. Nass. Thank you for revealing the many inter-related dimensions of this operation. The psy-op component you expose here is particularly significant.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Nass, it seems pretty clear to me that the "omicron" phase of this operation is yet another well-scripted and pre-planned element, and one not left to chance.

Elsewhere on your blog, you post Dr. Malone's technical take on "omicron". In particular, the alleged fact that it is a more infectious strain of the sars virus, even if outcomes are less serious when contracted.

However, it seems like a big question is missing from this discussion. And that is, to what extent have the "public health" measures -- imposed for nearly two years now -- resulted in populations becoming substantially *more susceptible* to infection of all types, including more susceptible to those pathogens and upper-respiratory infections even normally in circulation?

Wouldn't it be reasonable to infer that the many and various "public health" measures and edicts -- which have included extreme physical and social isolation, limiting healthy interactions, closing gyms, closing rec centers, closing senior centers, closing libraries, closing schools, reducing exercise, increasing stress, increasing sleep dysfunction, probable weight gain, probable increase in alcoholism, drug abuse, etc., etc., could significantly diminish our population's immune response from pre-pandemic levels? With the result of making us generally more susceptible to infections of any kind?

And by reducing our normal social circulation for two years, wouldn't it be reasonable to infer that our bodies' immune systems may have simply gotten a bit "lazy" in a way, not having to encounter, engage, and respond to the pathogens among which we would usually circulate?

And that's not even considering the effects of the injections themselves, which many physicians and scientists were concerned with at the outset -- and which grows more abundantly clear with each passing vaers report -- causes actual *damage* to our bodies' natural immune response.

So here we have the alleged "omicron" variant -- which by all accounts has a symptom set equivalent to the common cold. Coincidentally we are at the outset of winter in the northern hemisphere, the shortest days of the year, natural levels of vitamin D at their lowest -- the usual season for cold and flu. We have people congregating in proximity with holiday activities, after being greatly isolated for months on end. And too many of these people have been invisibly harmed by their forced injections.

Should we really be surprised at a noticable uptick in cold symptoms at this time? Like we really need to respond with yet more of the so-called "public health" measures that likely brought about our immune decline in the first place?

Anonymous said...

NEW EMAILS Show Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins Scheming Against Top Doctor’s Group that Challenged Their Failed and Deadly Policies!

Anonymous said...

Vaccines they said were "safe and effective". They didn't qualify how long it was effective, the duration of the study, what was known versus unknown in terms of safety based on the duration of the trials once the EUA was issued. The original EUAs for the jabs were based on 2 months of data, which is hardly assuring. They collected more data, but unblinded the trials at 6 months.

Once they started recommending it for pregnant women considering this group wasn't included in the trials, I was absolutely appalled. It was a one-size-fit-all approach to medicine, which is about as non-scientific as it comes.

There weren't any considerations of age and risk of dying from COVID versus the long term risk with these injections, even though this technology for immunizing is completely new.

The jabs have been a huge bust and haven't solved the underlying problem. Instead of backing off on this stupidity, dot gov wants to double down on it even though the virus has moved on from the alpha variant for some time.

Anonymous said...


Facts have a funny way of eventually getting in the way.

By the way, in Massachusetts, vaccine failure rates are not being reported as they should.

Here, 48% of 'fully vaxxed' in this state, using data from August to now, according to Mass. department of public health information posted online, is proportion of all covid related deaths.

Massachusetts Department of Public Health began publishing vaccine failure for deaths and for those contracting the Sars CoV2 disease mid-August.

Baseline for this analysis begins with first data the DPH published, showing, as of August 14:
12,641 cases ['breakthrough' cases]
124 deaths ['breakthrough' deaths].

At that time, August 14, 2021, there was total of
689,749 cumulative cases in Massachusetts
17,772 cumulative deaths

The most recently, weekly DPH vaccine failure report shows, as of Dec. 11
100,399 cases among fully vaccinated, defined "as those who test positive more than 14 days after the final dose of vaccine"
699 deaths in fully vaccinated.

Corresponding cumulative cases, and deaths, as of Dec. 11 according to DPH show
915,343 cases
19,217 deaths [reported Dec. 10; next daily not reported until Dec. 13]

The difference in cumulative cases and deaths, in this span, mid-August until December as follows:
Cases, 915343 - 689749 = 225,549 cases
Deaths, 19217 - 17772 = 1,445 deaths

100,399 breakthroughs of 225,549 total cases = ??%
699 breakthroughs of 1,445 total deaths = ??%

100399/225549= 45% of cases reported in Mass. since August among fully vaccinated

699/1445= 48% of deaths in Mass. since August among fully vaccinated.

Pogo said...

Such a list is a must.

The spirit of our democracy and governance by consent has gradually been eroded by raising the cash limits political parties can spend on electioneering. Before any prospective candidate can become a candidate for election they have to be approved by committee. It has become a fact of political life that these committees now can only put forward a candidate with the approval of party's major donors (who also want to know the candidates future ambitions, etc.). Putting whoever wins the election in the position that they feel obliged to put the party donors wishes before that of the electorate in cases where issues clash or suffer the consequence. Also the major donor can stack the cards in their favour still further by choosing those who appear to be open to being tempted to do the donors bidding with promises of well paid directorships etc., after they leave office. He who pays the piper calls the tune. Therefore, there’s no longer a fair choice available to the voting public. [and all the other things which would fill up a book]

However, were politicians to see that a well crafted charge-sheet was circulating around and growing name by name, week by week it would certainly give them something to think about. Like who’s side they think they are they on and who’s side will other people think they’re on etc.

For the time being, I think we can forget as to what effect it will have directly on the minds of Bill Gates and Zuckerberg’s of this world as they will remain feeling aloft until the end.

I know we can spend all the spare time we have just keeping up to date but DO Please find the time to watch this and encourage any poor souls who have been hypnotised by the TV on so on, to do the same.
Professor Mattias Desmet is a lecturer at the Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, Ghent University, Belgium and an expert on Mass Psychosis. Has 48 articles published in ISI-ranked journals. Worth listening to him to understand whats happening right now and how to wake people up. Peak Prosperity has a video, audio and transcript of their interview with him. Even if you think you know whats happening, this prof will fill in gaps you didn’t know you have.

Anonymous said...

Good speech. On the "Similarities 3" slide, perhaps in addition to "bribed politicians", there should also be "blackmailed politicians". I think it's more of a problem than people realize, and harder to discover.