Friday, January 21, 2022

Dr. Mercola covered my testimony to the Maine house on a bill to ban COVID vaccine mandates


  • January 11, 2022, the Health and Human Services Committee of the Maine legislature held a public hearing on LD867 “An Act to Prohibit Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccinations for 5 Years to Allow for Safety Testing and Investigations Into Reproductive Harm”
  • Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist with a special interest in vaccine-induced illnesses and expertise in anthrax and bioterrorism, testified in favor of the bill
  • All currently available COVID shots in the U.S. are experimental. None is licensed. Comirnaty, which has received full license, is not available in the U.S., and won’t be made available as long as doses of the Emergency Use Authorized Pfizer shot, BNT162b2, remain
  • Since the COVID shots are experimental, U.S. law requires potential recipients to have the right to refuse. Experimental drugs also cannot be mandated, and potential recipients must give written informed consent. Informed consent cannot be given when reports of side effects are censored and not disclosed
  • Some foundational safety studies are just now starting and won’t be completed until 2027

My interview today on the Stew Peters show

My interview with Tommy Carrigan

Thursday, January 20, 2022

My podcast with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. recorded on January 14

Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now/ BMJ

Three BMJ editors wrote a very strong editorial about the need to access the data on COVID vaccines, which have been kept from us. Here is an excerpt:

Pfizer’s pivotal covid vaccine trial was funded by the company and designed, run, analysed, and authored by Pfizer employees. The company and the contract research organisations that carried out the trial hold all the data.17 And Pfizer has indicated that it will not begin entertaining requests for trial data until May 2025, 24 months after the primary study completion date, which is listed on as 15 May 2023 (NCT04368728).

The lack of access to data is consistent across vaccine manufacturers.16 Moderna says data “may be available … with publication of the final study results in 2022.”18 Datasets will be available “upon request and subject to review once the trial is complete,” which has an estimated primary completion date of 27 October 2022 (NCT04470427).

As of 31 December 2021, AstraZeneca may be ready to entertain requests for data from several of its large phase III trials.19 But actually obtaining data could be slow going. As its website explains, “timelines vary per request and can take up to a year upon full submission of the request.”20

Underlying data for covid-19 therapeutics are similarly hard to find. Published reports of Regeneron’s phase III trial of its monoclonal antibody therapy REGEN-COV flatly state that participant level data will not be made available to others.21 Should the drug be approved (and not just emergency authorised), sharing “will be considered.” For remdesivir, the US National Institutes of Health, which funded the trial, created a new portal to share data (, but the dataset on offer is limited. An accompanying document explains: “The longitudinal data set only contains a small subset of the protocol and statistical analysis plan objectives.”

We are left with publications but no access to the underlying data on reasonable request. This is worrying for trial participants, researchers, clinicians, journal editors, policy makers, and the public... 

I wrote the following 'rapid response' yesterday.  Surprisingly, it was not posted, although in years past any reasonable comment went up on the website.

The BMJ Editors are absolutely correct about the need for granular, raw data from clinical trials to inform the public regarding the true efficacy and safety of new medical products.

But considered in the context of the COVID response, the refusal of manufacturers and regulators to release accumulated data is outrageous.  

1.  Almost all of these products were released to the public under emergency authorization, which requires a minimalist standard of evidence: "may be effective" [1]

2.  Because of this, in the US, the law requires that recipients be informed of the known and unknown significant benefits and risks of these products. [2]  But they are instead being given pablum such as "safe and effective," [3] despite the fact that this is a term of art reserved for licensed products, which most are not.

3.   If recipients are injured by the products, or if they do not work as claimed, the injured parties are prohibited from suing the manufacturer for damages [4]--information that is highly relevant to assessing the manufacturer's commitment to safety, yet it is not known to most of the public.

4.  These products are being given to millions of people during a short period of time, unlike the slow uptake over years of most licensed products.  Thus huge swathes of the population will have received them before adequate information about them enters the public domain.

Why is this acceptable to the regulatory agencies?  

Why is it okay to keep the public in the dark, despite laws to the contrary?





Wednesday, January 19, 2022

If Ivermectin Recognized, Justification for Lockdowns and Vaccine Mandates Would Evaporate: Doctor/ Epoch Times

By Harry Lee and Nicholas VandenNieuwenhof
January 19, 2022 Updated: January 19, 2022

Federal health agencies haven’t recognized ivermectin as an effective treatment for COVID-19 patients. According to Doctor Leland Stillman, the reason is more political than scientific, because otherwise there would be no basis for lockdowns or vaccine mandates.

“If ivermectin were recognized by the public health and academic establishment as the drug that it is, that treats acute viral illnesses, one of which is COVID-19, the entire justification for lockdowns, mandates, let alone vaccine research and development would evaporate overnight,” Stillman told The Epoch Times in a recent interview.

According to Section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (pdf), the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) can only issue emergency use authorization if certain criteria are met, including “there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product.”

So if there’s an approved alternative, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—an agency in HHS—can’t issue emergency use authorization for COVID-19 vaccines.

Stillman said it’s not a conspiracy theory or even an isolated opinion that ivermectin works for treating COVID-19, because tens of thousands of physicians all over the world have recognized its effectiveness...

Scientists Who Were Instrumental to COVID-19 ‘Natural Origins’ Narrative Received Over $50 Million in NIAID Funding in 2020-2021/ Epoch Times during-delta-wave-11642619009

Scientists Who Were Instrumental to COVID-19 ‘Natural Origins’ Narrative Received Over $50 Million in NIAID Funding in 2020-2021

January 19, 2022 Updated: January 19, 2022

News Analysis

Four prominent scientists who played key roles in shaping the public narrative around the origin of COVID-19 received substantial increases in grant money from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, in the subsequent two years, a review of funding data by The Epoch Times has found.

Three of these scientists—Kristian Andersen, Robert Garry, and Michael Farzan—were advisers to a teleconference organized by Fauci held on Feb. 1, 2020, in response to increasing public questions about the origin of the virus.

The scientists were also instrumental in the publication of Proximal Origin, a highly influential paper that promoted a natural origins theory for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and has been frequently cited by the government and media.

Emails released under Freedom of Information Act requests, showed that the scientists had told the senior members of Fauci’s teleconference that they were 60 to 80 percent sure that COVID-19 had come out of a lab...

The Last Days of the Covidian Cult/ C. J Hopkins

CJ Hopkins has done some of the best writing on what it is we have been going through for the past two years.  Here he chronicles its downfall.  He is very astute.  Pay attention, because he is predicting what we will experience in the near term. Go read the whole article!

...I’m sure you’ve noticed, the official Covid narrative is finally falling apart, or is being hastily disassembled, or historically revised, right before our eyes. The “experts” and “authorities” are finally acknowledging that the “Covid deaths” and “hospitalization” statistics are artificially inflated and totally unreliable (which they have been from the very beginning), and they are admitting that their miracle “vaccines” don’t work (unless you change the definition of the word “vaccine”), and that they have killed a few people, or maybe more than a few people, and that lockdowns were probably “a serious mistake.”

I am not going to bother with further citations. You can surf the Internet as well as I can. The point is, the “Apocalyptic Pandemic” PSYOP has reached its expiration date. After almost two years of mass hysteria over a virus that causes mild-to-moderate common-cold or flu-like symptoms (or absolutely no symptoms whatsoever) in about 95% of the infected and the overall infection fatality rate of which is approximately 0.1% to 0.5%, people’s nerves are shot. We are all exhausted. Even the Covidian cultists are exhausted. And they are starting to abandon the cult en masse.

It was always mostly just a matter of time. As Klaus Schwab said, “the pandemic represent[ed] a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world...”

Tuesday, January 18, 2022

It's a powerful vaccine!

Stolen from a well educated person who is also a healthcare professional:

"Among all the vaccines I have known in my life (diphtheria, tetanus,measles, rubella, chickenpox,hepatitis, meningitis and tuberculosis), I want to also add flu and pneumonia. I have never seen a vaccine that forced me to wear a mask and maintain my social distance, even when you are fully vaccinated. I had never heard of a vaccine that spreads the virus even after vaccination. 
I had never heard of rewards, discounts, incentives to get vaccinated. I never saw discrimination for those who didn't. If you haven't been vaccinated no one has tried to make you feel like a bad person. I have never seen a vaccine that threatens the relationship between family, colleagues and friends. I have never seen a vaccine used to threaten livelihoods, work or school.

I have never seen a vaccine that would allow a 12-year-old to override parental consent. 

After all the vaccines I listed above, I have never seen a vaccine like this one, which discriminates, divides and judges society as it is.  And as the social fabric tightens… It's a powerful vaccine!  She does all these things except IMMUNIZATION. If we still need a booster dose after we are fully vaccinated, and we still need to get a negative test after we are fully vaccinated, and we still need to wear a mask after we are fully vaccinated, and still be hospitalized after we have been fully vaccinated, it will likely come to “It's time for us to admit that we've been completely deceived."

The insightful and incisive young writer Tessa Lena, originally from the USSR, wrote an article and made a video about my situation. Do check out her other projects!

The video was taken off YouTube within 5 minutes (!) and reposted to Rumble.  I appreciated the chance to also talk about other aspects of medical and hospital care today that are extremely troubling.

Monday, January 17, 2022

Words From The Front: Spanish Police Declare Resistance To Covid Tyranny and Corruption-- State That They Are United With Police Forces Across Europe / Celia Farber's substack

"We promised to protect and serve the people...We're going to stop this!"

See the clip from Valencia, Spain here:

Translated with the help of sources in Spain who wished to remain anonymous: 

”We promised to protect and serve the people not the corrupt politicians. We feel very proud to be police but real police, not hit men of the government. Our association is in direct contact with members of security forces in Italy, Portugal, France, Austria, Switzerland, Sweden, Germany, and Holland. We’re going to join together all of the police of Europe. We’re going to stop this. The security forces and the armed forces are the key to all of this. We have to put ourselves on the side of the people, and turn our backs on the corrupt governments! We have denounced the Covid passport here in Valencia with our association. We’re going to demand responsibility from Señor Marlasca for the two states of emergency, and for using the police and the guardia civil to coerce the citizens. We don’t support that.” 

This seems to be a critical development, and one we will keep close tabs on. 

Thanks to Pélerine for this news tip. 

Incidentally, Pélerine was selected as an outstanding reviewer of Robert F. Kennedy’s The Real Anthony Fauci by The Defender, linked here. 

Congratulations Pélerine! 

And congratulations to all the good police men and women of Europe, keeping your oath to protect, and risking your lives and livelihoods to do so. We salute your courage, and keep you in prayer. 

The American Thinker ran a balanced piece about my case

January 17, 2022
Medical board suspends license of doc, asks for psych evaluation for prescribing ivermectin and HCQ for COVID and for public dissent from orthodoxy

Shades of the darkest days of the Stalinist Soviet Union, where dissent from the lethal incorrect pseudo-scientific doctrines of Lysenkoism could result in imprisonment in a psychiatric hospital!  Julia Marnin reports in the Miami Herald:

A doctor with decades of experience can't practice medicine after her license was temporarily suspended over complaints that she shared coronavirus misinformation, according to a Maine licensing board. The board has ordered her to undergo a neuropsychological evaluation, it said. Dr. Meryl J. Nass, who got a license to practice medicine in Maine in 1997, had her license "immediately" suspended for 30 days after a board investigation and review of complaints against her on Jan. 12, according to a suspension order from the Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine.

Nass, who's an internist in Ellsworth, must "submit" to an evaluation by a "Board-selected psychologist" on Feb. 1, the board's evaluation order issued Jan. 11 said.

Dr. Nass's purported "misconduct" includes both prescribing hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin and talking and writing about them in public.  Via Bizpacreview:

A 25-year Maine doctor has had her license temporarily suspended and been ordered to submit to a psychological evaluation for the alleged offenses of treating her patients with Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, in addition to sharing so-called "misinformation" about the coronavirus and its associated vaccines.

The State of Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine issued the 30-day suspension (minimum) last Tuesday on the grounds that Dr. Meryl J. Nass' medical services would constitute "an immediate jeopardy to the health and physical safety of the public."

The order goes into detail about how she prescribed Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine to several patients and once falsely labeled a patient a victim of Lyme disease so that the patient could procure these meds from a pharmacist.

"The patient [Patient 2] and I wanted him treated with hydroxychloroquine. I reviewed his dozen or so medications and discussed all potential drug interactions and how to ameliorate them, and we decided to proceed," Naas admitted last month in a written statement to the board.

Dr. Nass (Twitter icon).

Dr. Nass made a terrible choice, however, that may leave her vulnerable:

But the problem was finding a pharmacist willing to dispense the drug. I was eventually forced, when the pharmacist called a few minutes ago and asked me for the diagnosis, to provide misinformation: that I was prescribing the drug for Lyme disease, as this was the only way to get a potentially life-saving drug for my patient.

While saving lives is an understandable motivation, lying about the basis of a prescription — even of a drug with an excellent safety record — is a violation of norms and possibly laws.  But that detail does not seem to be the motivation behind the medical board's actions.

In an order separate from the suspension order, the board also demanded that she "submit to a neuropsychological evaluation by a Board-selected psychologist on February 1, 2022." It's presumed she must pass the evaluation to recover her license.

"The information received by the Board demonstrates that Dr. Nass is or may be unable to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety to her patients by reason of mental illness, alcohol intemperance, excessive use of drugs, narcotics, or as a result of a mental or physical condition interfering with the competent practice of medicine," the second order reads.

The "information" includes a complaint filed by someone on Oct. 26th that Nass "was engaging in the public dissemination of 'misinformation regarding the SARS CoV2 pandemic and the official public health response' ... via a video interview and on her website."

In the video, she reportedly criticized the federal government's mask/vaccine mandates, called out the government's refusal to acknowledge natural immunity, drew attention to the licensing dilemma surrounding the Pfizer vaccine, etc.

It is the public confrontation by Dr. Nass that seems to be the motive behind forcing a psychological evaluation.

The "information" also includes another complaint filed on Nov. 7th about the alleged "misinformation" she was sharing on Twitter.

This "misinformation" included "a link to an interview with Dr. [Joseph] Mercola," an osteopathic physician who's been labeled a "conspiracy theorist" by the establishment over his unorthodox views on treating COVID.

It also included her "stating that a patient informed consent form for hydroxychloroquine used at a hospital was a form 'designed to scare patients from using a safe drug that works well for COVID by making false claims," and that "humans beings, we're guinea pigs for these [the COVID] vaccines."

Should tweets like these send a physician for mental examination?

This smacks of suppression of dissent over a scientific and medical issue that is far from settled.

Dr. Nass has not yet indicated if she will submit to psychiatric evaluation.  Stay tuned.

My good friend and colleague Michael Palmer MD explains how the mRNA vaccines damage human tissue

Michael is very sound, very measured but his message is frightening nonetheless.  10 minutes.

4th vaccine dose "likely ineffective" and advisors failed to recommend it for the general Israeli population/ Times of Israel

Without evidence and most likely in a deal with Pfizer, Israel vaccinated 250,000 citizens with a 4th dose of vaccine.  These human guinea pigs have now learned this not only did not help them, but it may be impairing their immune response to COVID, making them more susceptible to infection.  Last Monday Israel had 40,000 new cases, the most ever recorded.

COVID provided the excuse for massive experimentation on humans without preceding them with experiments in animals.  It has to stop.

In his typical disingenuous fashion, Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, who has access to all medical records of Israel's 9 million citizens, said,

“I don’t know if there’s a need for a fourth booster. That’s something that needs to be tested. And I know that Israel already started some of these experiments, and we will also conduct some of these experiments to make sure that if needed, we use it,” he said.

“I don’t think we should do anything that is not needed.” 

EU regulator skeptical on need for additional COVID booster shot

As Israel administers fourth dose of vaccine to the elderly and immunosuppressed, EMA official says move likely ineffective

A woman looks on, as a health worker prepares to administer a booster shot of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine at a community health center in Jakarta, Indonesia, on January 12, 2022. (AP Photo/ Dita Alangkara)
A woman looks on, as a health worker prepares to administer a booster shot of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine at a community health center in Jakarta, Indonesia, on January 12, 2022. (AP Photo/ Dita Alangkara)

The main medical regulator for the European Union expressed reservations on Tuesday about the efficacy of an additional booster shot, given the evolving nature of the Omicron strain of the coronavirus and its ability to evade current immunization efforts.

“Preliminary results from recently published studies are showing that the vaccine effectiveness against the symptomatic disease is significantly reduced for Omicron and tends to wane over time,” said Marco Cavaleri, head of the Biological Health Threats and Vaccines Strategy division at the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Israel has opened up access to the fourth dose, or second booster shot, of the vaccine to at-risk groups, such as the immunocompromised and the elderly, and medical workers. So far, over a quarter of a million people in Israel have received the fourth dose of the coronavirus vaccine, according to the Health Ministry.

However, an advisory panel from the Health Ministry on Monday did not approve expanding access to the fourth dose to the wider population.

Israel, like much of the rest of the world, has been seeing record numbers of COVID-19 cases, driven in large part by the rapid spread of Omicron and threatening to overwhelm schoolshospitals, and the economy. According to Health Ministry statistics, the number of daily coronavirus cases topped 40,000 on Monday for the first time since the pandemic began.

The World Health Organization projected Tuesday that, over the next two months, more than half of the people in Europe could catch Omicron. Experts in Israel have estimated that 2-3 million Israelis could end up contracting Omicron before the current wave of coronavirus cases abates.

Israelis receive a dose of the COVID-19 vaccine at a temporary Maccabi health care center in Rehovot, on January 10, 2022. (Yossi Aloni/Flash90)

Calavi warned that fully relying on the fourth dose might not be the best option to mitigate the Omicron wave. “While use of additional boosters can be part of contingency plans, repeated vaccinations within short intervals would not represent a sustainable long-term strategy,” he said.

Furthermore, he said, Omicron could spur a “natural immunity” that, when combined with vaccination efforts, could help lead COVID-19 out of the pandemic phase.

“With the increase of immunity in population — and with Omicron, there will be a lot of natural immunity taking place on top of vaccination — we will be fast moving towards a scenario that will be closer to endemicity,” Calavi said.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla echoed the EMA’s recommendation during an interview on Monday with CNBC.

“I don’t know if there’s a need for a fourth booster. That’s something that needs to be tested. And I know that Israel already started some of these experiments, and we will also conduct some of these experiments to make sure that if needed, we use it,” he said.

“I don’t think we should do anything that is not needed.”

Bourla said that Pfizer is already manufacturing a vaccine targeting Omicron, which should be ready for the public’s use in March.

Agencies contributed to this report.