Tuesday, April 16, 2024

The WHO wishes to be the purveyor of biological warfare agents, to control information, and enforce untested, liability-free vaccinations on the world. Here are their own words, in screenshots

Politicians at all levels have been lied to about the WHO treaty and int'l health regulation amendments--so show them the screenshots. Here are the receipts!

Full copies of the IHRs and all WHO treaty drafts can be found at https://doortofreedom.org/who-resource-page/

I start out with the International Health Regulations (IHR) amendments. We don’t have an official version later than February 2023, so we don’t know exactly what will be voted on next month, but this is what the public has been shown. Everything inside a thin border with white background is verbatim from the proposed IHR Amendments.

The IHR amendments as well as the Pandemic Treaty specify that “potential pandemic pathogens” [both their sequences and actual specimens] are to be shared with the WHO and then shared globally, with the only proviso here being that WHO will not share them with “conflict and violence elements” once notified not to by a state party.

Now we move to screenshots from different versions of the Pandemic Treaty, which has had many names, but has been called the Pandemic Agreement since last October 2023. You can see that while the treaty claims to support unhindered access to information, a few pages later it demands that nations manage “infodemics” and censor misinformation and disinformation. This is typical of drafts of the treaty: it says one thing in one place and then elsewhere maintains the opposite, allowing politicians to claim the treaty asserts it does not grab any sovereignty, when it clearly does exactly that.

Another example of the WHO’s weasel words is the issue of health coverage. The WHO wants everyone to be required to pay for health insurance, and they imply that this will entitile us to a full panoply of healthcare services. But they have nothing in the documents that even begins to address providing expansive healthcare, nor even basic healthcare, for people.

An example of how sovereignty is to be grabbed is the demand for all nations to pass laws to allow the use of EUA (untested) vaccines and drugs, and the demand to pass laws to waive liability for such products.

The fact that the WHO wants to be the purveyor of open source biological warfare agents, also known as “potential pandemic pathogens” is so bizarre and extraordinary. It reflects the fact the diplomats think we are all morons and cannot see through what they are proposing—a mechanism to ensure pandemics can be started at will, by almost anyone who has received their share of these agents or has access to their online genetic sequences.

Below is from the March 7, 2024 Treaty draft. The treaty is in effect 24/7, which means that the required sharing of pathogens is to occur regardless of whether there is a pandemic or potential pandemic. It is not restricted to a response to a public health threat. It is an activity that is to occur year round, and nations are encouraged to find potential pandemic pathogens for which they can be rewarded monetarily. Wide sharing, beyond the WHO’s lab network, by the WHO and the party that found the pathogen is encouraged.

The screenshot below is from a version of the treaty that was issued in June 2023. At that time the draft coyly does not use the terminology “gain of function” but instead defines it, using the coded language “research to better understand the pathogenicity and transmissibility of pathogens with pandemic potential” to describe it. What Article 9, paragraph 5 really says is that if you are performing Gain of Function research, then “minimiz[e] unnecessary administrative hurdles for [that] research.” In other words, loosen the strictures, and thereby enable more lab accidents/spills/leaks to occur.

What does all this mean? First, the WHO lies and misleads, repeatedly. It is not an honest broker and should not be trusted by any nation.

Second, it is attempting to lead us into a pandemic era. One in which the WHO budget will skyrocket to at least ten times its current level, according to the World Bank.

Third, the WHO is breaking international laws and norms to do so. It must be stopped.

HOT! Today Dutch Parliament Votes to Instruct the Government to Demand a Delay in both WHO votes--and if no delay, to vote against the proposals


HOT! Today Dutch Parliament Votes to Instruct the Government to Demand a Delay in both WHO votes--and if no delay, to vote against the proposals

This motion got a majority vote of the Dutch Parliament !

MOTION BY MEMBER of the Dutch Parliament Mona KEIJZER ET AL.

Proposed April 10, 2024. A majority voted in favour April 16, 2024

After hearing the deliberations, noting that both the Working Group International Health Regulations (WGIHR) and the International Negotiating Body (INB) are authorized to deliver the final legal formulation of the envisaged amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and the Pandemic Treaty to the 77th World Health Assembly (WHA), which will take place at the end of May 2024; noting that this process is proceeding at an unprecedented pace, whereas such far-reaching measures require more time to be considered, reviewed and properly implemented; whereas ignoring procedural obligations under IHR and leaving unclear the link between the amended IHR and the new pandemic treaty undermines the international legal order and thus the democratic legitimacy of this regulation in violation of Article 55 of the IHR, which requires proposed amendments to be submitted to the Contracting States at least four months before deliberation and voting in the WHA; whereas this does not provide sufficient opportunity to examine the changes and their important legal, health, economic, financial and human rights implications; whereas the request to adopt the amendments to the IHR or the text of the envisaged pandemic treaty is not in line with the UN principles and guidelines; instructs the government to request a postponement of the vote on the amendments and thus on the IHR and the new pandemic treaty at the World Health Assembly and, if this postponement is not obtained, to vote against the proposed amendments to the IHR and the new pandemic treaty as a whole;

and proceeds to the order of the day.

Mona Keijzer, DaniĆ«lle Jansen, Fleur Agema  Members Dutch Parliament