Tuesday, January 25, 2022

How the suppression of HCQ was accomplished, including overdosing human subjects in 4 clinical trials

My major article on HCQ suppression:


My article on clinical trials and the deliberate overdosing of patients with HCQ

And yet another trial that overdosed patients with HCQ

Thailand Government Will Pay Compensation for Vaccine “Side Effects” and Deaths: One Billion Baht/ Bangkok Post via Global Research

What is important in this report by the Bangkok Post is that the Royal Thai Government (member state of the UN and the WHO) firmly acknowledges the deaths and adverse events affecting Thais who have taken the vaccine jab. 


“Out of the 11,707 people who filed a claim with authorities, 8,470 people, or 72.3% of all claimants, have been compensated”. 

1,962 individuals, namely 23% of the claimants “were left permanently paralysed or died after receiving their Covid-19 shot”. 

The implications are far-reaching. 

People in Thailand and around the World will be informed of the decision of the Thai government and will refuse to take the jab.

And this decision establishes a legal precedent. Class action law suits as well criminal charges against Big Pharma and corrupt governments are forthcoming.  

National governments will no longer be able to deny the devastating impacts of what is widely recognized as a killer vaccine. 

Nor will they be able to impose a vaccine passport. 

Also, if you have any doubts read  the report on the “Confidential Report” by Pfizer released under Freedom of Information which confirms unequivocally the criminal nature of the mRNA vaccine which has resulted in a Worldwide wave of deaths and injuries:

“What is contained in  Pfizer’s “confidential” report is detailed evidence on the impacts of the “vaccine” on mortality and morbidity. This data which emanates from the “Horse’s Mouth” can now be used to confront as well formulate legal procedures against Big Pharma, the governments, the WHO and the media.”

Everything you need to know about medical aspects of the pandemic and COVID treatment: the Ron Johnson event today

COVID-19, a Second Opinion.

Get educated.  Best 5 hours you may ever spend.  And it's free.

Senator Ron Johnson hosted a panel discussion yesterday, January 24, on all things COVID.

It was amazing.  All the experts from yesterday's rally, and more, were present in one Senate room, and everyone had a chance to speak.  Okay, I maybe disagreed with 1% of what was said, but it was an amazing compilation of information, all gathered together in time and space, which hopefully cannot be cancelled.  All the best people were there.

Make a meal, fold laundry, wash dishes, but find a way to sit down, learn and enjoy this.  It is truly a very special event.

How many otherwise healthy people die from COVID?

Here is some amazing information from the UK's Office of National Statistics.

It is a list, by age group, of deaths in which no other comorbidities, besides COVID, are listed on the death certificate.

From the start of the pandemic until the end of December 2021, 23 months, there were only 3 child deaths IN TOTAL in England and Wales (population 60 million) that had no co-morbid conditions listed on the death certificates. One occurred in an infant, and two in children aged 10 through 19.  

Only three COVID deaths occurred in otherwise healthy children over 23 months, in Great Britain, a nation of 60 million people.

Monday, January 24, 2022

Reposting. Ivermectin Suppression: Hydroxychloroquine Redux

Sunday, September 12, 2021

First, access to hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine was restricted.  The chloroquine drugs only work during active viral replication. While extremely safe at prescribed doses, and used daily for years by hundreds of thousands of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or lupus, overdose can be fatal.

Awareness of these facts led to the FDA restricting the use of hydroxychloroquine to only hospitalized patients, in whom it would no longer be effective. Three large multicenter, multination clinical trials were designed to give patients excessive amounts of hydroxychloroquine, leading to predictably increased arrhythmias and deaths.  Most of the early and large clinical trials were deliberately flawed, by either giving the drug too late or using too much. That's how the initial literature on hydroxychloroquine was contrived to make it appear ineffective and dangerous for Covid. Later studies that used appropriate doses, and gave the drug to patients during the first week of illness, showed almost uniformly excellent results.

While the HCQ research was being controlled early in 2020, FDA and about 30 states imposed other restrictions on its use.  Maine has one of the least severe restrictions, but the restriction is still unacceptable.  I can prescribe HCQ for early treatment but not for prophylaxis, even though the prophylactic dose is only about 1/6 of the treatment dose for lupus, and therefore extremely safe.

Like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin is also a licensed drug in the United States which physicians can (supposedly) prescribe freely. Fortunately, unlike HCQ, it is not toxic when given much more frequently than is necessary for parasites--which often require only one dose. It has been used over 3 billion times since 1987, without a prescription, for parasitic diseases. It is derived from a streptomycetes soil bacterium.  According to Wikipedia:

Streptomycetes... produce over two-thirds of the clinically useful antibiotics of natural origin, e.g., neomycincypemycingrisemycinbottromycins and chloramphenicol. The antibiotic streptomycin takes its name directly from Streptomyces. 

Ivermectin not only works during viral replication, but also is effective later in the illness.  This meant that the tricks that had been used to make hydroxychloroquine look bad would not be effective for ivermectin.  Furthermore, there have been dozens of independent studies showing the drug's safety and effectiveness for Covid.  The powers that be had not gotten into the game early with fake studies and fake publications.  

There have now been several metanalyses showing how well the drug works for Covid. I have previously linked to a metanalysis by Bryant, Lawrie et al., and another by Pierre Kory et al.

I suspect the powers that be were also gun-shy about repeating their tricks to stop the public getting effective treatment for Covid.  Would they be outed by media this time around?

As more and more people began to obtain ivermectin, and thereby were able to discard their fear of Covid, also perhaps discarding their need for vaccination, the bad guys apparently decided that despite the risk, they had to act.

This time a very concerted movement of FDA, CDC, Pharmacy chains, state medical boards, and drug wholesalers occurred together, beginning around August 25, 2021.  I wrote about this earlier in a piece titled "The Mess Media."  Let me lay out and expand on what happened.

At least 4 doctors in 3 states were suddenly publicly charged by their medical boards for prescribing ivermectin for Covid, and this made national news.  Immediately thereafter the CDC sent out an Emergency memo titled Severe Illness Associated with...Ivermectin. However the 4 pages of the memo said absolutely nothing about any adverse reactions to ivermectin prescribed by doctors.  Instead, it was claimed that one internet purchaser and one consumer of veterinary ivermectin developed neurologic symptoms and were hospitalized. The strategy was to paint ivermectin as an animal dewormer, and dangerous to boot.

FDA produced a famous tweet: "You are not a horse. You are not a cow" about people taking ivermectin, and put up a warning on its website.  However, the FDA has yet to acknowledge reviewing the literature on ivermectin for the human treatment of Covid.  Instead, FDA pretends that 31 randomized clinical trials do not exist, stating

Any use of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 should be avoided as its benefits and safety for these purposes have not been established. Data from clinical trials are necessary for us to determine whether ivermectin is safe and effective in treating or preventing COVID-19.

The NY Times reported on August 30, 

Demand Surges for Deworming Drug for Covid, Despite Scant Evidence It Works

Prescriptions for ivermectin have jumped to more than 88,000 per week, some pharmacists are reporting shortages and people are overdosing on forms of the drug meant for horses.

It was right around this time that the drug started to be unavailable.  Pharmacists began refusing to dispense it, and two told me they were afraid for their licenses.  

On September 1, The American Medical Association and the American Pharmacists Association issued a joint press release condemning the use of ivermectin for Covid. 

Then lies about a huge number of calls to poison control centers were disseminated nationally.  The Associated Press reported that 70% of calls to Mississippi's poison center were for ivermectin.  Soon the AP corrected itself, when Mississippi's chief epidemiologist said it was only "about 2%." 

An actual Oklahoma doctor was interviewed by a TV station and somehow claimed that there were so many ivermectin overdoses coming to ERs that people arriving with gunshot wounds were having to wait.  This story made the international news, was covered by tweets from Rachel Maddow, and Rolling Stone did a big story about it: 

Gunshot Victims Left Waiting as Horse Dewormer Overdoses Overwhelm Oklahoma Hospitals, Doctor Says"

--using a photo of a long line of patients, allegedly waiting to be seen in an ER.

This story apparently had too many legs.  One hospital where the doctor worked issued a statement that it had seen absolutely zero ivermectin overdoses, and there were no lines of patients waiting for care.  The story was a complete fabrication, harking back to the Lancet paper on the dangers of the chloroquine drugs.

Within a few days, Walgreens' and CVS' corporate offices told their staff to stop filling ivermectin scripts.  Cardinal Health, a distributor for many pharmacies, told those pharmacies (including my local Hannaford's) the drug was on backorder and Cardinal had no idea when it would be available.  Cardinal formed a business relationship with CVS in 2014.  I do not know if that is relevant or not.

Amerisource-Bergen and McKesson are the two other large drug wholesaler-distributors in the US.  In 2018 these three companies controlled 95% of the US market.

I bit the bullet and drove around town surveying the local pharmacists, which is how I got this information.  McKesson is not making ivermectin available to Osco or Walmart pharmacies. No one local obtains ivermectin through Amerisource.

So, I can prescribe it, but the supply has been shut off. 

Tomorrow I will call the compounding pharmacies and see what their situation is.

UPDATE September 13:  From Boise Idaho:

BOISE — Since the U.S. Centers for Disease Control issued an official health advisory Aug. 26 against using ivermectin, an anti-parasite drug, to prevent or treat COVID-19, Idaho has seen warnings from officials, but no new rules about prescribing or using the controversial drug.

However, a nationwide shortage of the drug over the past two weeks has stopped many Treasure Valley pharmacies from filling invermectin prescriptions at all. “We haven’t been able to buy any ivermectin for a couple of weeks,” Travis Walthall, pharmacist and manager of Custom RX Pharmacy in Kuna, said Friday. “So we have not filled one in weeks or more.”

Walthall said prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, he filled maybe one ivermectin prescription a year. By mid-August, his pharmacy was filling four or five a week...

I have spoken to two compounding pharmacies this morning, and they still have a supply of the medicine. They do not obtain it through the big three wholesalers, and can dispense it for cash/credit card payments, because compounded meds are generally not covered by insurance. I think compounding pharmacists are more accustomed to dealing with controversial drugs, and so they have not succumbed to the propaganda.  They know they cannot get into trouble for filling a legal prescription.

If you want some, I suggest you not hesitate obtaining it, as we do not know what will happen next.

13% of US hospitals critically understaffed. Let's explore how this came to be, and what it might portend

Becker's Hospital Review provided the numbers regarding medical understaffing.

No matter how the hospitals, states and federal government try to spin it, and no matter how much crazy money is paid to travelling, temporary doctors, nurses or others to move them around to plug a few holes, the fact remains that a huge number of people have stopped working as medical professionals.

You cannot simply press some buttons and turn out new doctors, nurses, and various therapists no matter how many robots or 3D printers you have.

It takes a bare minimum of 11 years after high school to educate a doctor, and for a super specialist, it can take up to about 18 years.

In general, it take at least 3 years post high school to train a nurse, but most nurses now have a college degree and often some postgraduate education.

The federal health bureaucracy did not want to coin extra doctors or nurses, based on the bean-counter theory that each doctor generated a certain amount of tests, radiology procedures etc.--in other words, each doctor generates a few million dollars in medical costs yearly, much of which were costs to Medicare and Medicaid. Similarly, the system did not want extra hospital beds to exist, on the bean-counter theory that more beds will lead to more hospital admissions and costs to HHS.

Thus the US government has deliberately destroyed whatever medical surge capacity it may have had.  Furthermore, by destroying individual initiative and autonomy on the job, and turning doctors and nurses into obedient typists, it made  jobs in healthcare considerably less rewarding--resulting in many career changes and early retirements. 

The vaccine mandates for healthcare workers were simply the icing on the healthcare worker shortage cake. 

You can't tell me the economists in the Department of Health and Human Services weren't aware this would happen.  They deliberately made the job unpleasant by getting rid of transcriptionists.  A decent electronic medical record (EMR) system would not have required doctors or scribes (a new profession of paraprofessionals who type into the electronic medical record during doctor visits) to do all the typing.  The new EMRs could have been crafted to include dictated notes, just as the old medical chart incorporated dications fairly seamlessly into the record.  But they did not want to encourage free texting of the patient history--they wanted to standardize every visit.

The result was the dehumanization of the patient record, the loss of detail in the record, the degrading of patient care and the mechanization of the medical provider.

Who thought these were good things? I have a few hypotheses:

  • Those who wanted to get rid of the doctor patient relationship and have robots take over medical care?  Did they think that pitting patients and medical providers against each other during the Pandemic would further this goal?
  • Those who wanted to use the EMR for surveillance?
  • Those who thought reducing life expectancy would reduce costs to the federal government?
  • Those who believe in technocracy as if it is a religion, unable to see its inhumanity?

Did these people see the loss of doctors, nurses and other medical professionals over the vaccine mandates as another net good, reducing costs?

Who are these people?  Can they be identified?  Whose edicts are they carrying out? What is the end game?  

OTOH, their trashing of what was once the world's premier medical system does open up possibilities to create something better.

  • What do we need in order to rebuild a medical system that caters to the needs of people? 
  • Is the EMR a good tradeoff between efficiency and privacy, or should we go back to paper charts and take our patients' medical concerns off the internet?  
  • What do doctors and nurses need to learn during their training that is currently missing? 

A lot of people are asking these questions, and I welcome your input. 

Friday, January 21, 2022

Dr. Mercola covered my testimony to the Maine house on a bill to ban COVID vaccine mandates



  • January 11, 2022, the Health and Human Services Committee of the Maine legislature held a public hearing on LD867 “An Act to Prohibit Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccinations for 5 Years to Allow for Safety Testing and Investigations Into Reproductive Harm”
  • Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist with a special interest in vaccine-induced illnesses and expertise in anthrax and bioterrorism, testified in favor of the bill
  • All currently available COVID shots in the U.S. are experimental. None is licensed. Comirnaty, which has received full license, is not available in the U.S., and won’t be made available as long as doses of the Emergency Use Authorized Pfizer shot, BNT162b2, remain
  • Since the COVID shots are experimental, U.S. law requires potential recipients to have the right to refuse. Experimental drugs also cannot be mandated, and potential recipients must give written informed consent. Informed consent cannot be given when reports of side effects are censored and not disclosed
  • Some foundational safety studies are just now starting and won’t be completed until 2027

My interview today on the Stew Peters show


My interview with Tommy Carrigan


Thursday, January 20, 2022

My podcast with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. recorded on January 14


Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now/ BMJ

Three BMJ editors wrote a very strong editorial about the need to access the data on COVID vaccines, which have been kept from us. Here is an excerpt:

Pfizer’s pivotal covid vaccine trial was funded by the company and designed, run, analysed, and authored by Pfizer employees. The company and the contract research organisations that carried out the trial hold all the data.17 And Pfizer has indicated that it will not begin entertaining requests for trial data until May 2025, 24 months after the primary study completion date, which is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov as 15 May 2023 (NCT04368728).

The lack of access to data is consistent across vaccine manufacturers.16 Moderna says data “may be available … with publication of the final study results in 2022.”18 Datasets will be available “upon request and subject to review once the trial is complete,” which has an estimated primary completion date of 27 October 2022 (NCT04470427).

As of 31 December 2021, AstraZeneca may be ready to entertain requests for data from several of its large phase III trials.19 But actually obtaining data could be slow going. As its website explains, “timelines vary per request and can take up to a year upon full submission of the request.”20

Underlying data for covid-19 therapeutics are similarly hard to find. Published reports of Regeneron’s phase III trial of its monoclonal antibody therapy REGEN-COV flatly state that participant level data will not be made available to others.21 Should the drug be approved (and not just emergency authorised), sharing “will be considered.” For remdesivir, the US National Institutes of Health, which funded the trial, created a new portal to share data (https://accessclinicaldata.niaid.nih.gov/), but the dataset on offer is limited. An accompanying document explains: “The longitudinal data set only contains a small subset of the protocol and statistical analysis plan objectives.”

We are left with publications but no access to the underlying data on reasonable request. This is worrying for trial participants, researchers, clinicians, journal editors, policy makers, and the public... 

I wrote the following 'rapid response' yesterday.  Surprisingly, it was not posted, although in years past any reasonable comment went up on the website.

The BMJ Editors are absolutely correct about the need for granular, raw data from clinical trials to inform the public regarding the true efficacy and safety of new medical products.

But considered in the context of the COVID response, the refusal of manufacturers and regulators to release accumulated data is outrageous.  

1.  Almost all of these products were released to the public under emergency authorization, which requires a minimalist standard of evidence: "may be effective" [1]

2.  Because of this, in the US, the law requires that recipients be informed of the known and unknown significant benefits and risks of these products. [2]  But they are instead being given pablum such as "safe and effective," [3] despite the fact that this is a term of art reserved for licensed products, which most are not.

3.   If recipients are injured by the products, or if they do not work as claimed, the injured parties are prohibited from suing the manufacturer for damages [4]--information that is highly relevant to assessing the manufacturer's commitment to safety, yet it is not known to most of the public.

4.  These products are being given to millions of people during a short period of time, unlike the slow uptake over years of most licensed products.  Thus huge swathes of the population will have received them before adequate information about them enters the public domain.

Why is this acceptable to the regulatory agencies?  

Why is it okay to keep the public in the dark, despite laws to the contrary?

1. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3

2. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3

3. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/keythingstoknow.html

4. https://aspr.hhs.gov/legal/PREPact/Pages/default.aspx

Wednesday, January 19, 2022

If Ivermectin Recognized, Justification for Lockdowns and Vaccine Mandates Would Evaporate: Doctor/ Epoch Times


By Harry Lee and Nicholas VandenNieuwenhof
January 19, 2022 Updated: January 19, 2022

Federal health agencies haven’t recognized ivermectin as an effective treatment for COVID-19 patients. According to Doctor Leland Stillman, the reason is more political than scientific, because otherwise there would be no basis for lockdowns or vaccine mandates.

“If ivermectin were recognized by the public health and academic establishment as the drug that it is, that treats acute viral illnesses, one of which is COVID-19, the entire justification for lockdowns, mandates, let alone vaccine research and development would evaporate overnight,” Stillman told The Epoch Times in a recent interview.

According to Section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (pdf), the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) can only issue emergency use authorization if certain criteria are met, including “there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product.”

So if there’s an approved alternative, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—an agency in HHS—can’t issue emergency use authorization for COVID-19 vaccines.

Stillman said it’s not a conspiracy theory or even an isolated opinion that ivermectin works for treating COVID-19, because tens of thousands of physicians all over the world have recognized its effectiveness...

Scientists Who Were Instrumental to COVID-19 ‘Natural Origins’ Narrative Received Over $50 Million in NIAID Funding in 2020-2021/ Epoch Times

https://www.wsj.com/articles/prior-covid-19-infection-offered-better-protection-than-vaccination during-delta-wave-11642619009

Scientists Who Were Instrumental to COVID-19 ‘Natural Origins’ Narrative Received Over $50 Million in NIAID Funding in 2020-2021

January 19, 2022 Updated: January 19, 2022

News Analysis

Four prominent scientists who played key roles in shaping the public narrative around the origin of COVID-19 received substantial increases in grant money from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, in the subsequent two years, a review of funding data by The Epoch Times has found.

Three of these scientists—Kristian Andersen, Robert Garry, and Michael Farzan—were advisers to a teleconference organized by Fauci held on Feb. 1, 2020, in response to increasing public questions about the origin of the virus.

The scientists were also instrumental in the publication of Proximal Origin, a highly influential paper that promoted a natural origins theory for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and has been frequently cited by the government and media.

Emails released under Freedom of Information Act requests, showed that the scientists had told the senior members of Fauci’s teleconference that they were 60 to 80 percent sure that COVID-19 had come out of a lab...

The Last Days of the Covidian Cult/ C. J Hopkins

CJ Hopkins has done some of the best writing on what it is we have been going through for the past two years.  Here he chronicles its downfall.  He is very astute.  Pay attention, because he is predicting what we will experience in the near term. Go read the whole article!


...I’m sure you’ve noticed, the official Covid narrative is finally falling apart, or is being hastily disassembled, or historically revised, right before our eyes. The “experts” and “authorities” are finally acknowledging that the “Covid deaths” and “hospitalization” statistics are artificially inflated and totally unreliable (which they have been from the very beginning), and they are admitting that their miracle “vaccines” don’t work (unless you change the definition of the word “vaccine”), and that they have killed a few people, or maybe more than a few people, and that lockdowns were probably “a serious mistake.”

I am not going to bother with further citations. You can surf the Internet as well as I can. The point is, the “Apocalyptic Pandemic” PSYOP has reached its expiration date. After almost two years of mass hysteria over a virus that causes mild-to-moderate common-cold or flu-like symptoms (or absolutely no symptoms whatsoever) in about 95% of the infected and the overall infection fatality rate of which is approximately 0.1% to 0.5%, people’s nerves are shot. We are all exhausted. Even the Covidian cultists are exhausted. And they are starting to abandon the cult en masse.

It was always mostly just a matter of time. As Klaus Schwab said, “the pandemic represent[ed] a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world...”

Tuesday, January 18, 2022

It's a powerful vaccine!

Stolen from a well educated person who is also a healthcare professional:

"Among all the vaccines I have known in my life (diphtheria, tetanus,measles, rubella, chickenpox,hepatitis, meningitis and tuberculosis), I want to also add flu and pneumonia. I have never seen a vaccine that forced me to wear a mask and maintain my social distance, even when you are fully vaccinated. I had never heard of a vaccine that spreads the virus even after vaccination. 
I had never heard of rewards, discounts, incentives to get vaccinated. I never saw discrimination for those who didn't. If you haven't been vaccinated no one has tried to make you feel like a bad person. I have never seen a vaccine that threatens the relationship between family, colleagues and friends. I have never seen a vaccine used to threaten livelihoods, work or school.

I have never seen a vaccine that would allow a 12-year-old to override parental consent. 

After all the vaccines I listed above, I have never seen a vaccine like this one, which discriminates, divides and judges society as it is.  And as the social fabric tightens… It's a powerful vaccine!  She does all these things except IMMUNIZATION. If we still need a booster dose after we are fully vaccinated, and we still need to get a negative test after we are fully vaccinated, and we still need to wear a mask after we are fully vaccinated, and still be hospitalized after we have been fully vaccinated, it will likely come to “It's time for us to admit that we've been completely deceived."

The insightful and incisive young writer Tessa Lena, originally from the USSR, wrote an article and made a video about my situation. Do check out her other projects!


The video was taken off YouTube within 5 minutes (!) and reposted to Rumble.  I appreciated the chance to also talk about other aspects of medical and hospital care today that are extremely troubling.

Monday, January 17, 2022

Words From The Front: Spanish Police Declare Resistance To Covid Tyranny and Corruption-- State That They Are United With Police Forces Across Europe / Celia Farber's substack

"We promised to protect and serve the people...We're going to stop this!"

See the clip from Valencia, Spain here:


Translated with the help of sources in Spain who wished to remain anonymous: 

”We promised to protect and serve the people not the corrupt politicians. We feel very proud to be police but real police, not hit men of the government. Our association is in direct contact with members of security forces in Italy, Portugal, France, Austria, Switzerland, Sweden, Germany, and Holland. We’re going to join together all of the police of Europe. We’re going to stop this. The security forces and the armed forces are the key to all of this. We have to put ourselves on the side of the people, and turn our backs on the corrupt governments! We have denounced the Covid passport here in Valencia with our association. We’re going to demand responsibility from Señor Marlasca for the two states of emergency, and for using the police and the guardia civil to coerce the citizens. We don’t support that.” 

This seems to be a critical development, and one we will keep close tabs on. 

Thanks to Pélerine for this news tip. 

Incidentally, Pélerine was selected as an outstanding reviewer of Robert F. Kennedy’s The Real Anthony Fauci by The Defender, linked here. 

Congratulations Pélerine! 

And congratulations to all the good police men and women of Europe, keeping your oath to protect, and risking your lives and livelihoods to do so. We salute your courage, and keep you in prayer.