Wednesday, January 24, 2024

Do they really want to make animals equal to people? One Health wants to lower the status of humans.

What did the Lancet say last January about One Health? That non-human animals are of equal concern as humans.

“The reality is that One Health will be delivered in

countries, not by concordats between multilateral

organisations, but by taking a fundamentally different

approach to the natural world, one in which we are as

concerned about the welfare of non-human animals and

the environment as we are about humans. In its truest

sense, One Health is a call for ecological, not merely

health, equity.”

It is in the last paragraph below. Please reassure yourself that this is really what the WHO, Biden administration, EU, World Bank and all the other One Health scammers are planning for us. Hey, animals need equity too.

Tedros Talks with forked Tongue. Here's the evidence. Let's look at a few things he told Agence France Press and The Guardian. What does the draft treaty really say?


I have come to love making powerpoint slides, as they seem to convey ideas better than I can do in just words. You get the idea from the Guardian’s photo and text that Tedros is troubled. Will the treaty (aka agreement) (aka accord) pass?

The powers behind the WHO throne knew they could only win if they could outsmart us. And they had the ability to pay for the world’s finest sociopathic lawyers. They had to sneak the bad stuff past us.

  1. One way of doing that is to deny it exists.

  2. Another is to misrepresent what their proposed documents show.

  3. Yet another method is to include contradictory passages in the treaty, and refer back to one claim, without revealing that the opposite claim is also embedded in the treaty.

  4. Another method runs through everything the WHO does. Financial guru Max Keiser coined the perfect term for this: Complexification. Deliberately complicate things so they are very hard to unravel and understand. The two WHO documents are completely different, treated differently, yet have many overlapping provisions. It is extremely difficult to keep them straight in your head. And their use of language is deliberately confusing. Tedros routinely claims that one document does not say “X,” when it is the other document that says “X”.

Here is the Guardian article. Let’s look at some of the tricks pulled in just one article.

  1. Make it about the children, always. “Plans for a global pandemic preparedness agreement risk falling apart amid wrangling and disinformation, according to the chief of the World Health Organization, who has warned that future generations “may not forgive us”.

  2. Projection. Accuse the other side of doing what you are doing, i.e., spreading lies and disinformation.

  3. Conflate two very different things. “Tedros said all countries needed the capacity to detect and share pathogens presenting a risk, and timely access to tests, treatments and vaccines.” What he fails to admit is that the treaty and amendments want nations to go out and find potential pandemic pathogens (aka biological warfare agents) all the time, not just during pandemics, and give them to the WHO for wider distribution. This is code for proliferation of biological weapons. If nations actually went along with this plan, I can virtually guarantee hundreds of lab leaks and possibly deliberate biological attacks with these agents.

    Sharing biowarfare agents is very different than timely access to tests and treatments.

  4. Use code, and make it about the children. “He called for a “strong agreement that will help to protect our children and grandchildren from future pandemics”.’ The word strong in this coded context means enforceable. Nations will be obligated to obey the WHO. They must be accountable and compliant, according to the treaty draft.

  5. Lie outright, and when challenged, show the claim in the treaty that nations are to remain sovereign, and hide the parts of the treaty that show that nations must cede sovereignty to the WHO.

  6. Claim universal agreement with the treaty. “The WHO emergencies director, Michael Ryan, reminded countries how the pandemic “ripped apart our social, economic and political systems and became a multi-trillion dollar problem”.

    In the midst of major geopolitical conflicts, “this is one thing the world agrees on”, he said.”

What is sovereignty? The ability to rule yourself. If you allow someone else to rule you, in whole or part, you are ceding sovereignty over whatever it is they can command.

Let’s look at page 20 of the treaty for an example of how sovereignty is to be lost. The WHO requires nations to pass certain laws, using the word shall, which in legal language, in international treaties, means MUST.

Article 14 paragraph 1 tells nations they must expedite approvals (i.e., licenses) and authorizations (i.e., EUAs) of pandemic drugs and vaccines. Decoding this, it means nations need to find ways to get drugs and vaccines into their populations without going through full testing and licensing. In the US, an EUA can be issued without testing the product in even one experimental animal.

Article 14 paragraph 5 tells nations they must have laws and regulations in place to push pandemic drugs and vaccines out quickly.

Article 15 paragraph 1 tells nations they must “manage” liability for these hastily produced pandemic drugs and vaccines. Decoded, this means that manufacturers, WHO and government officials must be held harmless for injuries from the hastily made products that WHO will help produce.

Does it seem like nations are retaining control of the approval processes for pandemic products? Are they in control of the liability provisions? The WHO is telling them what they must do. Nations are expected to follow the WHO’s orders if they sign on to the treaty and/or amendments. However, because nations are told they themselves must pass such laws, the WHO claims the nations have retained sovereignty.

And WHO says so with its forked tongue in Article 3, paragraph 2:

Sovereignty – States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the general principles of international law, the sovereign right to legislate and to implement legislation in pursuance of their health policies.

And by the way, the following is a list of possible recommended actions (Article 18) that comes from the International Health Regulations (IHR). The WHO’s Director-General will be able to issue orders for any of these measures to be applied anywhere in the world (as 196 countries are already parties to the IHR) once the IHR amendments become BINDING—if the amendments are passed in May 2024.

He could order vaccine passports, quarantines, lockdowns, mandate vaccines and/or “treatment,” close borders, impose contact tracing or require you to be swabbed or examined. Although Tedros claimed he would not have the power to impose vaccine mandates or lockdowns, you can verify for yourself that he would have precisely those powers, granted by the IHR, not the treaty.

Does Tedros speak with forked tongue?

What do you think? Is WHO trying to pull a fast one, or not?

Saturday, January 20, 2024

Why is Davos so interested in Disease X? The global biosecurity agenda is critical for them to achieve the New World Order/Great Reset

They strung several very well constructed fairy tales together that, when believed, lead you to walk happily into their ovens and pay for the privilege. It's that simple.

Robert and Jill Malone wrote an excellent substack piece on what has been going on at Davos this week in a collaboration between the WHO and the WEF titled “Disease X and the Corrupt Lancet,” and they also discussed Disease X’s evil twin “One Health.”

The fact that the WEF and the WHO have become partners to terrify the world in order to get us back on track so we allow them to make our decisions for us, extract lots of our money and lead us along the yellow brick road to One World Government--well, it should tell you plenty.

Quoting from the Malones’ piece (in italics):

The big push from the WHO and the WEF is that “Disease X” will be zoonotic. That money to surveil every speck of land in the world is the path forward to stopping “Disease X”. What a coincidence that the brand new CIA/intelligence agency designated to run the National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center to surveil pathogens intends to do just that. And that this happens to be intended to run in parallel with the CIA mission to surveil the world for other (nefarious?) purposes.

According to the WHO, Disease X is all about One Health solutions. The World Health organization describes One Health as the following:

Government officials, researchers and workers across sectors at the local, national, regional and global levels should implement joint responses to health threats. This includes developing shared databases and surveillance across different sectors, and identifying new solutions that address the root causes and links between risks and impacts.

Basically One Health gives public health official total control and surveillance across AI, the internet, agriculture, climate change, public health, medical systems, ecological sites, urban and rural areas. It can encompass just about anything. It also values animal and plant life as equal to human life. The WHO goes on:

investigating the impact of human activity on the environment and wildlife habitats, and how this drives disease threats. Critical areas include food production and distribution, urbanization and infrastructure development, international travel and trade, activities that lead to biodiversity loss and climate change, and those that put increased pressure on the natural resource base – all of which can lead to the emergence of zoonotic diseases.

We have seen this playbook before…

The White House admits we don’t know how to prevent pandemics, so it will spend your money developing new technologies that so far have not worked, and it will be glad to share your medical records internationally in its tireless efforts to seek out pandemics:

Robert and Jill went on to establish that the medical journals that suppressed information on the origin of COVID and effective treatments were part of a financial matrix in which the WEF was centrally located.

Yesterday I interviewed James Howard Kunstler, who told me that basically the world is being run through racketeering by a criminal mafia that controls politicians around the world and others of importance. Is that true? I looked it up. Per Wikipedia, “Racketeering is a type of organized crime in which the persons set up a coercive, fraudulent, extortionary, or otherwise illegal coordinated scheme or operation to repeatedly or consistently collect a profit.” I think James used the right terminology. I am going to start using it myself.

I have explained my analysis for why the zoonotic theory of origin was absolutely critical for the world takeover scheme that was to succeed it. I hope these little power-point slides I made will make it very clear:

  1. It would help organize world politics around the idea of protecting people from pandemics, controlling the public through fear, yet again. Fear is the most effective motivator known.

  2. But in fact it would institutionalize and fund the creation of new lab-borne biowarfare agents that could be released (or leak) to cause future pandemics, as well as a massive new surveillance and control apparatus. What happened is that Daszak’s EcoHealth PREDICT program got internationalized, with every nation now instructed to do what Peter Daszak paid a few to do: go find potential Biowarfare agents and give them to the WHO, which will “share them globally.”

  1. It would institutionalize giving WEF participants a seat at the pandemic prevention table, especially in the drafting of the pandemic treaty, in addition to countries having a seat. Who are these “relevant stakeholders” and “non-state actors?”

  1. It was important to cover up the fact that this house of cards (otherwise known as pandemic preparedness) had already proved itself to be a terrible bust. The WHO’s hand-picked Independent panel was unable to hide that fact that nations that were designated the best prepared for a pandemic had the highest death rates during the critical first few months of the pandemic. Here is the panel and their report:

And here is what they were forced to write and the graph they could not suppress. Please expand it so you can appreciate what it shows. It graphs death rates (on a log scale to make the extremely high death rates in developed countries appear lower relative to those in less developed countries) against how well each country scored on the CDC’s favorite measure of pandemic preparedness, termed the Joint External Evaluation or JEE. It shows that the better prepared a nation was (the higher they scored on the JEE) the higher was their death rate. And the correlation was tight and highly reliable.

Comparable to how the CDC still pushes us to take the COVID kill shots, the CDC still touts the JEE as a valid measure of pandemic preparedness. Just don’t look at the graph. Ignore the man behind the curtain.

That graph alone should tell you that the whole concept of pandemic preparedness, pushed out by the WEF, WHO, CDC, EU, G20, World Bank and Biden administration is yet one more fraud designed to rob from us, control us and potentially kill us.

  1. Pandemic preparedness is also a scam positioned to support that other big scam, climate change.

And two summing-up slides:

Monday, January 1, 2024

The Wuhan Cover-Up: Review of Bobby Kennedy’s Crucial Book.

It goes back in time to the several decade-long lead-up to COVID, then continues into the future where The Real Anthony Fauci left off.

The Wuhan Cover-Up: Review of Bobby Kennedy's Crucial Book

By Meryl Nass   January 1, 2024   History, Society, Vaccines   

5 minute read

When Bobby Kennedy talked about writing this book a couple of years ago, I asked him, Why? Mindful of how the truth about everything COVID (and much else) was being memory-holed, he said he wanted to create an accurate historical record of what happened, for the future.

I thought that was a good answer. We desperately need a clear, accurate understanding about many things that have been taking place over the past few years, or should I say decades, and we all need to be saving hard copies or pdfs on hard drives of the important bits of history that we dig up.

Bobby did the difficult part and collected those scraps, and he knitted them together into a narrative that very few people know about. In a nushell: there is a cabal that took the concept of biological warfare 30 years ago and ran with it—in order to create new industries, massive profits, and control the world using fear of death by contagion. He created a history that is also a page-turner, enabling us to understand in a much deeper way what we have just lived through.

No kidding: RFK’s book has the receipts. Tony Fauci is only one pawn on the chessboard in this story. There are many others, and I will mention just a few. Assistant HHS Secretary Robert Kadlec is another. Sir/Dr. Jeremy Farrar is a real Knight, despite or because of having played a pivotal role in the overdosing of over 2500 patients with hydroxychloroquine in the UK/Oxford and WHO clinical trials that he oversaw and funded, of whom nearly 500 died.

There are the funders; the scientists who will do anything for another grant; the massive network controlled by a syndicate: the moneymen and women from NIH’s many institutes, especially its best-funded NIAID; the NSF, whose former director was on the board of EcoHealth Alliance; the Wellcome Trust, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation; and other charities deeply entangled with the ones I just mentioned. There are think tanks that help guide the direction the funding takes. A US DoD that contributes billions to whitewash and hide its biowarfare research. And a massive bureaucracy and media that protects all these people from exposure and punishment.

Nobody really wants to think about bioweapons. They are unpleasant in the extreme to contemplate. They should not exist. They challenge our entire concept of medicine as being sacrosanct, the knowledge of medicine never to be used for harm. This is in the Hippocratic oath.

Unfortunately, we cannot bury our heads in the sand over this issue. Our lack of knowledge about it, our revulsion toward it, and our deep-seated fears about it have enabled the spectre of biological warfare to lead us on a long and winding road to hell.

The 2001 anthrax letters, sent at the right time to the right Senators, led to the Patriot Act, a hugely profitable biodefense industry and the rise of the Surveillance State.

By 2005 we had the PREP Act, ostensibly to allow the DoD to continue using anthrax vaccine despite the revocation of the vaccine’s license in 2004. Did anyone know back then that the PREP Act would be used to green light contaminated gene therapy injections for billions around the world? Why didn’t the scientists designing these injections predict some, if not all of their harms, having spent hundreds of $ millions to study beta coronaviruses over 2 decades? Or did they?

Without the PREP Act removing liability from the COVID vaccine manufacturers, the injectors, and the government planners who both designed the program, and gave away billions of taxpayer dollars in bonuses for each shot administered, such untested, unlicensed and deadly shots would never have been administered.

These Patriot and PREP Acts were passed because Congress and the American public were played like a fiddle, induced to be terrified. Congress attempted to immunize itself from criticism by throwing money at the problem, much going to Fauci, while through ignorance Congress made the problem of biological warfare far worse.

Many Americans took the COVID experimental shots willingly, out of terror and ignorance. The half that held back were mostly beaten, shamed or cajoled into compliance through the most incredible, federally-funded fifth generation mind control assault the world has ever experienced.

We have just lived through 3 bioweapon events, at least: the original Wuhan coronavirus; the Omicron variant; and monkeypox, all of which assuredly came from labs.

It is obvious many more nasty viruses and other microorganisms are still sitting in labs, many sponsored by military and intelligence agencies using our tax dollars. It is absolutely critical that the public act a lot smarter than it did last time, if there is a next time. It is critical to know what it is we are dealing with. And critical to understand there ARE ways we can save ourselves that lie outside the government’s prescribed Overton window.

The Wuhan Cover-Up gives you the facts, the history and the understanding you need to grasp what is actually happening, right now. If enough of us read it, we will gain the knowledge and strength in numbers to stop and defund the biowarfare industry, revoke these terrible laws, and lay down our deep, unconscious fears regarding contagion.

[Full disclosure: I helped edit this book. I was the first person in the world to study an epidemic (epizootic) and prove it was due to biological warfare.]