Wednesday, January 12, 2022

The 2 interesting new items that turned up today and the EcoHealth application to DARPA

Robert Malone has discussed two important items that came to light since yesterday.  And used this interesting graphic:

The first is a letter from Jim Jordan and James Comer, ranking members of the House Committee on the Judiciary and the House Government Reform Committee, to the HHS Secretary, asking for release of more Fauci/NIH emails.

Their letter provides some new emails, with additional evidence of the coverup by Fauci, Farrar and Francis Collins of a lab origin of SARS-2.  Lawrence Tabak, now the acting NIH Director, is on some of these coverup emails as well as earlier ones.

[I don't see any Medical Boards going after these guys for lying to Congress, suppressing effective COVID treatments, ghostwriting medical journal articles with intent to deceive, and putting a hit on the three esteemed authors of the Great Barrington Declaration.]

The second item is a report from a Marine Fellow at DARPA to an Inspector General, leaked by Project Veritas.  It is a non-scientist's report of documents in government files that speak to the possible origin of COVID, the coverup of the origin, and the suppression of treatments, among other things.

The provenance of the document is unclear.  The author is not a specialist and may not get the details right.  It might be a forgery, though it looks like a government document.  But, if real, it does provide additional possible details of the origin story.  Clearly the DRASTIC team, and probably Charles Rixey, a former Marine, had significant input into this analysis.

I have been very hesitant to accept that SARS-2 came from a vaccine project, when it seems to have been, if anything, engineered for virulence.  In fact, claiming that SARS-2 arose from a vaccine project designed for bats may just be another origin coverup story.  But as Malone says, read it and decide for yourself.

Here is the EcoHealth Alliance proposal that DARPA allegedly rejected due to "gain of function" concerns, leaked by DRASTIC several months ago.  Note that researchers in the US, China and Singapore are included.


Anonymous said...

Pfizer CEO: “Two doses of the vaccine offers very limited protection, if anyPosted on 1/11/22 at 8:20 am to stout
14 boosters might kill you but you won't get Covid which most likely won't kill you

Why won't you just listen to the science?!?!?

quarterly boosters huh? sign me up.

Its all crumbling down for many posters on this site

Epescially the Drs who are really CPAs on this board

Year 2034

227 doses offers little protection against COVID. However, 228 doses greatly reduces your chances of hospitalization.

Remember when we were told it would keep the disease from spreading?


What's the difference between the first two doses and the booster?

Blood clots and myocarditis?

CEO of billion dollar pharmaceutical company says you should have more of his pharmaceuticals to be extra safe.


The booster has the microchip in it

Damage control defcon

Yep, and a couple of months later, we get the news that it doesn't really prevent infection.


They said if we took the vaccines it would all be done. The vaccine's been out for well over a year and Covid is worse than ever.

So their solution? More vaccines and boosters that work so well to stop Covid.


Fast forward a year and we are talking about putting healthy people in camps.

This whole argument means nothing now that the DARPA papers are declassified, and your death classified as omicron?

Of course the politicians are going along. They get bigpharma pay 2,3 4...

Perfect business model.

Two is good, three is better!

Three is fine, four is needed!

Four is doing your duty, but five guarantees a future!

Man I wish I had this guy’s balls for essentially selling a defective product to federal govts around the world for billions of dollars

Duuurrrr - the antibody infusion doesnt work against Omicron.

But 6 doses of a rna will fix you right up.

We were told it was perfectly fine to go out In public maskless if you're vaccinated.

But four jabs will do the trick, right? At least until you say we need a fifth with fifth of favorite liquor if jabbed this week free too

This is why the "80% of hospitalizations" narrative should be taken at face value.

Anonymous said...


ATLANTA (KMOX) -- CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said that Covid-19 vaccines are no longer effective at preventing transmission of the virus.

So then your argument is the vaccine protects you that much from going to the hospital for anything and everything?

That makes it even more impressive

What do you do for a living?

Pfizer CEO: “Two doses of the vaccine offers very limited protection, if any”

Think about it, the elderly and unhealthy are the most vaccinated, and yet hospitals hover at 75-90% unvaxxed. And like you said most of the covid cases are just incidental. So the vaccine must be preventing all illness extremely well

How did we decide that certain vaccines need a 5-dose series? Again, you are beholden to that initial advertising, and not any notion of how a primary program is developed.

Probably not by lying.

Hold on while I look up some study that was paid for by the govt and pharmaceutical company to sell more vaccines.

All the unvaccinated know it's complete bunk because the reality is that early treatment means much more than a 'vaccine'. They should have been giving everyone who tests positive 4 HCQ pills and whatever their dose of Ivermectin instead of sending them home with NOTHING except the advice that if they can't breathe then go to the hospital.

Now we're learning the truth that we've always seen. All this was done to enrich a certain group of people and create a permanent change in our culture and economy. But keep on believing those govt studies that pay researchers for the 'correct' outcome. Basically what they did with global warming.

You're missing the point entirely. It was billed as something to prevent the virus, which never was the case.

"Keep you and me safe instead with a slogan”, and it was wrong.

I blame politicians, not scientists. Now, they're trying to scare parents with small children.

It's crazy how many people who don't see this as a money making scheme.

I'm not even saying that the vaccine is 100% worthless, it's just that the way it's being pushed (to kids, and other populations that aren't really at risk, boosters, etc...) is obviously driven by money.

I got my two doses, I'm good.

Don't you love it when "Corporate overlords" become the partner of government? We now love our corporate partners.

They were just awarded a $400 million contract to produce therapeutics. Every member of congress is also heavily invested in Pfizer. frick them all.

Well, if international studies showing that the vaccinated are MORE at risk, are true.... all of the "aw shucks!'"

Pfizer CEO March 2021 “Two doses of the vaccine offers 95% lasting protection and is robust against variants!"
Pfizer CEO August 2021 “Two doses will keep you out of the hospital or from dying!"
Pfizer CEO in December 2021 "Two doses of the vaccine will give protection similar to a seasonal flu shot!"
Pfizer CEO in January 2022 “Two doses of the vaccine offers very limited protection, if any"


Pfizer CEO: “Two doses of the vaccine offers very limited protection, if any

Translation….drug dealer attempts to sell more drugs.

Uh, sorry I was naive enough to believe politicians initially because I understood how primary programs are developed. Obviously, that 2-dose reference was deeply meaningful to you.

Anonymous said...

1.) Can they Un-Equivocally state they are not picking up the Common Cold or the Seasonal Flu?
Tests are so Flawed Medicare will not even cover Home Tests, what does Medicare know?

2.) "It Turns Out If You Doubted COVID Headlines, You Were Correct"!

3.) How many lives could have been saved with IVERMECTIN!
Who in the FDA Downplayed Ivermectin?
Ivermectin 'Works Throughout All Phases' Of COVID According To Leaked Military Documents!

Anonymous said...

The CDC just announced that the RT-PCR Test being used for the past 2 years to "diagnose" SARS-CoV-2 is COMPLETELY INVALID - as 'it cannot distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza', and further it cannot distinguish between Original / Delta / Omicro strains.

Here is the link:

So it appears that using an INVALID lab test, millions of people around the world have been frightened into taking an Experimental Use Only "gene-editing procedure", that has damaged their immune system and has resulted in millions of deaths around the world. And now, these people are effectively being told its "boosters forever" to keep them alive. The reality is boosters are not the real answer.

Pogo said...

Maybe EcoHealth Alliance et al have ended up running running a bigger experiment than they could ever have originally hoped for.

Dr. Mike Yeadon is struggling (both mentally and emotionally) with the realization that he has discovered evidence of an experiment-within-an-experiment thrust upon the world population. With evidence from lot numbers that most of the severe adverse reactions come from just 10% of the vaccine lots or batches and to the tune of 300% over base line, he concludes that this looks like they(?) are calibrating a bioweapon. [Makes sense therefore, to ban HCQ & Ivermectin as those would attenuate the signal.] Mike’s is a long presentation so by all means skip though to 49 minutes in, where he gets into nitty gritty (what comes before is mostly laying down the foundations of what he is about to present so you needn’t view that).

Also, one must consider that as the global financial system finally collapsed in September of 2019, leaving warehouses in China filling up to over flowing with goods that the rest of the world had no good credit left to buy them with, then a reason to stop the world economy would still have to have been found.

One aim of war time propaganda is to inject so much noise into the arena that critical reasoning becomes overwhelmed. Therefore, I’ve placed all my cognitive dissonances into a box and hidden it in the cellar so that I can still think.

Anonymous said...

Below link. This is well worth reading [and is must reading for the corrupt Maine med. lic. board among others; though I suspect, them suffering Stockholm Syndrome, they and others of their ilk will just have anther temper tantrum as it interferes with their faith-based pre-enlightenment "thought". Yes, when it comes to these characters, we are Dealing With Dynamite.]

This essay, short, sweet, comprehensive indictment of Israel response in particular, the west/USA in general.

Includes this nugget: [You have not set up an effective system for reporting side effects from the vaccines, and reports on side effects have even been deleted from your Facebook page. Doctors avoid linking side effects to the vaccine, lest you persecute them as you did with some of their colleagues. You have ignored many reports of changes in menstrual intensity and menstrual cycle times.]

In the USA, we had New England Journal of Medicine publish the CDC's Dr. Tom Shimabukuro lying to public about the V-SAFE data:

"Among 827 participants who had a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a live birth in 712 (86.1%), in a spontaneous abortion in 104 (12.6%). . . "

And Shimabukuro and NEJM Lying to the public:


Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines." NEJM, April 2021.

The 12.6% miscarriage rate through 20 weeks of gestation, based on Shimabukuro's own data, -- this conclusion was wrong; and NEJM let this happen.

In fact, of first trimester women, the rate was 82%, according to their data.

Shimabukuro used the wrong denominator to get 12% miscarriage rate.

Of 827 completed pregnancies, at least 700 were from third semester covid 19 vax shots.

Thus, at most, 127 otherwise, either trimester 1 or 2/

Thus at least 104 spontaneous abortions, divided by at most 127, equals a miscarriage rate of at least 81.88976%

104/127 = 82%

Following this April 2021 NEJM article, they published correction in October 2021, stating in part:

[[the “V-safe Pregnancy Registry” cell should have read “104,” rather than “104/827 (12.6)‡.”]]

and says: [[the following content should have been appended to the double dagger footnote: “No denominator was available to calculate a risk estimate for spontaneous abortions, because at the time of this report, follow-up through 20 weeks was not yet available for 905 of the 1224 participants vaccinated within 30 days before the first day of the last menstrual period or in the first trimester. Furthermore, any risk estimate would need to account for gestational week–specific risk of spontaneous abortion.”]]


The 82% should have been reported; and the Shimaburo/NEJM should have also stated that: 905 of the 1224 participants are still being followed.

What are those results? Help us out Tom/NEJM. By Oct. seven months later results would have been known!

Anonymous said...

The Major Murphy document is very interesting -- and logically compelling. The idea that the virus was intentionally developed as a synthetic *vaccine* to inoculate the *bats* (yes, wild and crazy -- though remember that itself could be a cover story -- they may have been plotting an excuse for testing the technology of an aerosolized weapon) has a lot of explanatory power. There are a number of facets to these revelations. Including the fact that both chloroquine and ivermectin were known as effective treatments at the outset. The project veritas report itself is rather superficial, aiming mostly to discredit Fauci. I would encourage all readers to review the original documents as Dr. Nass has linked. Better than a Le Carre novel!

WaffleStaffel said...

"The Project Veritas document dump does not add new text to the DEFUSE story. It merely surrounds it with a more tenuously solid imprint of authenticity"
I Could Have DARPED All Night -
I want to feel good about Malone himself, but time will tell.