5 papers discussing homologies between the spike protein and human tissue that could induce autoimmune adverse effects.
1. https://www.cell.com/cell-reports-medicine/fulltext/S2666-3791(21)00116-6
2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7499017/
3. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41420-020-00321-y
4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246018/
5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021777/
6. Here is an interesting paper that investigated the mechanisms by which the Astra-Zeneca vaccine causes blood clots and low platelet counts. My limited understanding is that even though the vaccine used a chimpanzee adenovirus to avoid autoimmunity, the altered virus was grown in human kidney cells. And the vaccine (rolled out in haste and not very pure) contains over 1000 proteins, some of which do cross react with human tissues.
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-440461/v1
7. This study suggests a mechanism for the effects on the brain of Spike protein subunits.
"Blood-brain barrier function is negatively affected by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunits. Brain endothelial cells show a distinct pro-inflammatory response when exposed to various SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunits."
7 comments:
The Salk team said, . . . "a major new study shows that the virus spike proteins (which behave very differently than those safely encoded by vaccines) also play a key role in the disease itself."
So are they saying the vaccine spike protein is safe, but the spike protein from the disease is not? In other words, get the vaccine? If the vaccine generated spike protein is so different from the original, how can the antibodies generated by exposure to the vaccine actually block the virus?
🙂 Good for you, Meryl. You're on the job every day. 😉
I had the same thought.
Here is a reaction to he Salk report from Europe.
"The fundamental and technological basis - on which all of the vaccines that were distributed in the West - is flawed. We thought that the spike protein would only enter the cells to create antibodies so if you faced the wild virus, it would not latch onto your cells, however, we were wrong. We were wrong because the spike protein in itself, creates disease, and if you inject trillions of them into a human body, there will be manifestations of disease in many cases."
"It is not safe to inject trillions of spike proteins into a muscle, because it bypasses layers of your immune system which could have potentially neutralized the virus... By crossing the threshold of the human body through the injection of these compounds, you are not giving your immune system the chance to mount a strong enough response to the spike protein in order to neutralize it. (The vaccine) will have this disease-creating spike protein in it if you agree (to take) any of these vaccines. ....It is now up to us to try to fix the mistake they have made."
IF THE FDA DOES NOT PULL THE EUA FOR ALL mRNA VACCINES ON THE BASIS OF THIS STUDY, THEN THEY ARE DIRECTLY COMPLICIT IN THE DEATH, INJURY, AND STERILIZATION OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.
What effects do these mRNA vaccines have on the worlds blood supply?
If a person gets an mRNA vaccine, and they give a blood donation, is that blood "safe"?
That is, if I as a person who has never had an mRNA vaccine receives blood from a mRNA vaccinated donor (for an emergency surgery), will I have the mRNA spike protein vaccine in my body and will I possibly have a risk of an autoimmune disease?
If so, what legal recourse do I have as I never consented to the vaccine.
About the Salk article, here is a comment from The Unz Review:
In the original article, the first paragraph reads differently than [there now]. It read like this:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Scientists have known for a while that SARS-CoV-2’s distinctive “spike” proteins help the virus infect its host by latching on to healthy cells. Now, a major new study shows that they play a key role in the disease itself.
--------------------------------------------------------------
[That paragraph] was changed to read like this:
--------------------------------------------------------------
LA JOLLA—Scientists have known for a while that SARS-CoV-2’s distinctive “spike” proteins help the virus infect its host by latching on to healthy cells. Now, a major new study shows that the virus spike proteins (which behave very differently than those safely encoded by vaccines) also play a key role in the disease itself.
--------------------------------------------------------------
There is a significant difference between the two paragraphs.
Do you need proof that the original text was changed??
Then listen to Robin Monotti Graziadei read the first paragraph on YouTube ...
The novel coronavirus spike protein plays additional key role in illness
What this helps to show is that there is a rapid response team that is ... performing “mopping up” exercises when people say something that does not conform to the official narrative.
Thank you Anonymous for your research into the change of wording in the Salk article. The use of parentheses was my first tip-off, as it lacks professionalism. I suspected someone was covering their tail.
How sad medicine is becoming a pseudoscience.
MR
Post a Comment