Monday, May 31, 2021

Illegitimate rules remove parental consent for Covid vaccines.The Rule of Law is being dismantled and our children are the prey

Continuing from the last post:  the US had very high rates of Covid compared to many countries, and right now that seems to have been a good thing... since places like Australia and New Zealand seem to want to be able to impose lockdowns for the forseeable future as they pursue the impossible goal of zero Covid.  Impossible because you are not going to get everyone on the planet to accept a shot, and then vaccinate the wild animals and pets who are also susceptible.  We have basically reached herd immunity with a combination of vaccine and natural immunity.  Since only 40% of the US population is fully vaccinated, according to the NYT, there has undoubtedly been a considerable amount of natural immunity that has accrued.

Why aren't the media celebrating?  Apparently the powers that be who have made so many disastrous decisions regarding pandemic management don't want us to know this, yet.  Thus their huge hurry to vaccinate despite the law, despite the still experimental nature of the vaccine products:

* The colleges demanding vaccinations

* The employers firing the unvaccinated

* The authorization for 12-15 year olds

* The million dollar lotteries for vaccinees, and other excesses to coerce vaccinations

But now the ante has been upped even higher.  While many laws have been disregarded during the pandemic emergency, under the rubric of an emergency, two things I learned today are the worst.

Children aged 12-15 are being invited to vaccine clinics without parental permission, in the cities of San Francisco, Seattle and Philadelphia, based on emergency edicts in local jurisdictions, coupled with a Declaration by Alex Azar in March 2020 broadening the liability waiver umbrella for "covered countermeasures" during a pandemic to virtually anyone who has anything to do with a vaccine program.  This could be interpreted as covering anyone who chooses to mandate the vaccine, even while experimental.  In other words, even though you are not permitted to mandate an experimental product, Alex Azar said he would not allow you to be punished if you did so.

There do exist real laws, which preceded the pandemic, that protect children as a special class from both being used as experimental subjects (which legally under EUA this is) and protect them by requiring parental consent for procedures, unless they are emancipated minors.

Unless these laws were revoked while I blinked, they still exist and, as federal laws supercede those imposed by a lesser jurisdiction, they have primacy.

Let's see what happens.  This is "hot" news and I don't have time to put in the links, but this is true.

Finally, the FDA has announced its vaccine advisory committee will meet on June 10 to advise (aka bless) FDA on data needed for authorization and/or licensure for pediatric Covid vaccines.  Not to put too fine a point on it, it is possible the FDA will authorize Covid vaccines for younger children, or even license them, starting June 11. 

Meanwhile, Israeli media have claimed that one in 3 to 6 thousand vaccinees (I think in the 15-30 age group) develops myocarditis.  The doctor who performed the Israeli study said the rate of myocarditis is "5 to 25 times higher" than the baseline rate. 

It is likely the FDA is trying to forestall any more bad news, which is why it is moving so rapidly.  Furthermore, the FDA has warned us that it may not be able to provide any background documents prior to the June 10 meeting. That means the public and the advisors may be entirely in the dark as the advisors vote to provide their approval for whatever the FDA has up its sleeve.

Meanwhile, the Indian Bar Association has served legal notice for suppression of ivermectin against the WHO Chief Scientist, Soumya Souvinathan, who headed up the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) before transferring to the WHO. She was warned by the ICMR that the HCQ doses were too high in the WHO's Solidarity trial, which was ignored. The Solidarity trial continued until I warned Tedros and Ana Maria Restrepo at WHO that they could be personally liabile for not informating patients of the nontherapeutic dose being administered in the consents they obtained from subjects.  It then turned out WHO did not even require a consent!! and left consent up to the local centers. Three days after my warning WHO ceased the HCQ arm.

The potential legal liability of those persons who carry out illegal acts, such as overdosing patients or vaccinating unconsented children (because they really cannot legally give informed consent even if the local health officer says so after getting a CDC memo) is an important weak link in the house of cards called "pandemic response."  The apparatchiks need to be reminded that following illegal orders was not an acceptable excuse at Nuremberg, and it isn't acceptable today.   


yvette said...

All over Canada, provincial rules allow for kids of any age to get vaccinated without parental consent, even for Covid, when the medical professional attending deems them capable of understanding what they are consenting to (lol, since SCIENCE ITSELF does not understand what these vaccines will do long term). It seems that in most places this was always the case for youth vaccination. In some places this may mean that the kid could also refuse (theoretically only, since that's almost impossible for a kid to do).

It's a shocking discovery - I didn't know this was the law in most of Canada.


New Brunswick


And a very sad story from Saskatchewan about a kid with good instincts:

Anonymous said...

Canadian here. In Toronto the Medical Dictatorship set up clinics offering free ice cream for the kiddies. Vaxxing them with Pfizer as young as 12 without parental consent. (Kids can't go on school field trips without parental consent).

Anonymous said...

Dr. Nass, thanks for the alert. I have two questions:

1) Can the FDA take any actions at all before "officially" addressing the Citizens Petition?

2) Under Trump, the White House website allowed citizens to post a Petition of sorts, that
others could sign in support. Do you know if that still exist?

If something was available on the White House site, up to 200 million people would sign in support
of forcing the FDA to pull the EUA permanently.

Meryl Nass, M.D. said...

As is probably apparent, this seems to me to be a crime against humanity.

The Citizen Petition is different that other petitions. It is a legal process, enshrined in FDA law, which FDA must respond to with a substantive answer to each issue. If unsatisfied with the response, litigation can proceed.

People can (and definitely should) comment on the petition, which strengthens it in the eyes of the FDA. We would love to see a million comments. This would make it almost impossible for FDA to ignore.

We don't obtain signatures; rather, we need comments regarding the Petition submitted to the Citizen Petition Docket at this URL, where the petition can be downloaded and comments can be made at the blue comment button:

Meryl Nass, M.D. said...

The FDA can act as it chooses at any time. There is a time limit to respond to the petition.

WaffleStaffel said...

Thank you Dr. Nass. I've commented on the petition.