Friday, July 30, 2021

Official UK data (July 23) and Delta has significantly lower mortality than alpha, beta and eta variants

Alpha and Delta are split about 50:50 causing the vast majority of UK cases.  Here is the updated report:

Mortality in the over 50 age group (pages 14 and 15) was 4.8% for alpha, 4.3% for beta, 5.3% for eta, and only 1.8% for Delta.

Here's the thing:  the USG spin doctors created a lie about Delta so they could keep the panic going.  Perhaps Delta looked fearful at one time.  But now the Delta story is all bullshit.  While Delta may be the first variant to break through vaccine-induced (limited and waning) protection, I can guarantee it will not be the last.  Breaking through vaccine protection is a completely different issue than how virulent or deadly a variant or strain is, overall.

Just to confirm this for yourself, go look up The NY Times daily cases and deaths.  The US cases are said to be over 80% Delta.  You will find that case numbers began shooting up 4 weeks ago.

Deaths have normally followed case upticks with a two week delay.  But this time, deaths have barely budged over the last two weeks, failing to follow the trajectory of cases.

It just shows we are living in scamdemic times. But are any of these numbers reliable?  For whatever reason, it appears the UK government is significantly less brazen about making up statistics than the Walensky's and Fauci's are on this side of the pond.

The unvaccinated among us can be pleased we did not waiver from our convictions.  Looks like for Delta, vaccinees got all the risk, and none of the benefit.  And now they want to sell you a booster...


Anonymous said...

Dr. Nass, just finished watching the latest video update from the FLCCC. Dr. Marik said the Delta variant is more infectious and more virulent, and it is affecting younger people more than the previous variants. I am so confused.

Video link:

Dr. Marik is advocating early treatment as the way out of this pandemic, which has always been reasonable to me on several levels: keeping sick people from spreading the disease, keeping the sick from dying, and keeping our country from economic ruin which will kill more people. The FLCCC is also recommending increasing the dose of Ivermectin and staying on it x 5 days, as they say the Delta variant replicates to a much higher concentration in the nasopharynx.



Meryl Nass, M.D. said...

Because the US data on deaths and cases has been demonstrably corrupted, I tend to rely on data from other countries. And the UK info seems best on variants.

For Delta in the UK since Feb 1, 205,549 cases were recorded in those UNDER 50. There were between 1500 and 4000 hospitalizations in this under 50 age group. There were 45 deaths, or 0.01--0.02% of cases.

So yes, it predominantly affects the young, but it hospitalizes and kills them at lower rates than alpha (66deaths in 32K cases under 50), beta (7 deaths in 161 cases) and eta strains (no deaths in 273 cases, but higher hospitalization rate than Delta has

This is the strain I would want to get as it seems less virulent. I'd try to bring Delta to a chicken pox party and get all the kids infected, then begin treatment if any got sick..

The Dough Boy said...

Who determines that there is a new 'variant' strain and how is it done? We hear about variant alpha, beta, etc., and that the next one is always 'more deadly and contagious' but I've never seen any substantiating proof. Do they take cultures from every sick patient and then compare them? If so, how? Are there any electron microscope images of these so we can see the difference between alpha, beta, delta etc.? Or are we just being TOLD this is the case? How do they say delta is 1000x more infectious without showing how they determine this? Just wondering...

Anonymous said...

1. How Graphene Oxide in Anti-flu Vaccines Created the ‘First Wave’?

2. Graphene oxide – the real reason for COVID19??

3. All the coronavirus jabs and their variants, including Pfizer, Moderna, Sinovac, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Sputnik, etc., also have a specific dose of 'graphene oxide nanoparticles'. What we are telling you is part of the results of the analysis of the researches by electron microscopy and spectroscopy, techniques used by numerous universities in the U.S.
Graphene Oxide Causes COVID-19? It Enters The Body In Multiple Ways?

4.) DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID 'Vaccine'
'Graphene Oxide'

Anonymous said...

Graphene Oxide Poisoning is Covid Disease?
Which is why COVID-19 degrades a master antioxidant, called glutathione, in living human cells.
Which is why children don’t get COVID because they have high levels of 'glutathione'.
Which is why the FDA recently ordered N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) to be removed from vitamin store shelves, because it dramatically restores glutathione levels.

Anonymous said...

A.) Is 'Graphene Oxide' Causing What Is Falsely Being Referred to as ‘Covid-19?’

B.) 'Graphene oxide' accumulated in the lungs generates bilateral pneumonias by uniform dissemination in the pulmonary alveolar tract. Graphene oxide causes a 'metallic taste'. Perhaps this is starting to make sense to you now. Inhaled graphene oxide causes inflammation of the mucous membranes and thus 'loss of taste and partial or total loss of smell'.

Anonymous said...

The data from the Delta variant cases/deaths across vax status was interesting, and followed the pattern from previous reports:

Delta variant cases:

28,773 - Fully Vaccinated (not incl 54,092 partially vac'd)
121,402 - Unvaccinated

Delta variant deaths:

224 of 28,773 - Fully Vaccinated cases = 0.778% died
165 of 121,402 - Unvaccinated cases = 0.136% died

Case rate comparison: 28773/121402 = 0.24x for vaccinated
Death rate comparison: 0.778/0.136 = 5.7x for vaccinated (!)

Thus, there were a larger absolute number of deaths in the fully vaccinated despite the lower fraction of 'cases'. This was because the rate of death per Delta infection was almost 6x the rate of death in the unvaccinated. This looks like antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). I could not determine if the UK was doing the CDC fraud of avoiding testing covid-like cases, only if vaccinated.


Anonymous said...

Study Cited by CDC to Push New Mask Guidance was Rejected by Peer Review and Based on Vaccine Not Used in US!

Deadly Blood Clots Develop In 62% of People Receiving COVID Vaccine.
'Graphene Oxide?'

Anonymous said...

Meta-analyses based on '18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19' have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Nass,

The graphene oxide story is burning up the internet and an ex-Pfizer employees have stated it is true. While you have previously cast doubt on the original story out of Spain, can you update us on your current thinking?

And even if you disagree with the story, can you please explain what would happen to a person who did have 40 Trillion particles of graphene oxide coursing throughout their bloodstream. What would that look like in your medical opinion?

And very specifically, can it also explain the "magnetism" (That has been 100% confirmed) being reported by many people after taking the mRNA vaccines, in your opinion?

Anonymous said...

David E. Martin PhD., In my opinion, the evidence presented below along with additional evidence presented in the video proves that all of these pathogenic variants of the coronavirus were laboratory developed, man-made bioweapons. And they’ve all been funded by the NIAID under the direction of a self-proclaimed Jesuit, Dr. Anthony Fauci.

The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier- investigation into possible illegal patent claims resulting in millions of $ in commercial benefits?

Anonymous said...

German Study: Laboratory Accident Most Likely Cause Of Coronavirus Pandemic
“Professor Dr. Roland Wiesendanger, a leading German expert in the field of nanotechnology and three-time winner of the prestigious European Research Council Advanced Grant, has completed a one-year, hundred-page study on the origin of the novel coronavirus. Professor Wiesendanger concludes that “both the number and quality of the circumstantial evidence point to a laboratory accident at the virological institute in the city of Wuhan as the cause of the current pandemic.”

Swiss Policy Research (SPR)
“SPR would like to add the following information: The two most recent global pandemics were the 1977 ‘Russian flu’ and the 2009 ‘swine flu’. In both of these cases, modern genetic research indicates 'that a lab escape was the most likely origin of the pandemic virus' (see here – and here –

Nina said...

Dr Nass--regarding DELTA variant:'"Ninety-five percent of the patients we have in the hospital have NOT been vaccinated," said Dr. Varon. "Five percent have been vaccinated."

I would tend to trust Dr Varon's stats...what are your thoughts? (AND --again--why is there NO mention of FLCCC's MASK protocol? OR Dr Varon's success rate---ONLY the deaths and failures are mentioned...Fear porn AGAIN.)

Secondly--I too am interested on your thoughts regarding the graphene oxide story....will you be posting on this?
THANKS again for all your hard work!