Thursday, July 22, 2021

Here is how you do the Big Lie/ CNBC and the 99.5% of deaths in the unvaccinated

First CNBC set up the story.  It provided facts that actually don't mean very much. but sound frightening.  It said the virus is 1,000 times more transmissible than the original. In fact, precisely this strategy was used in the early days of Covid.  

The variant is highly contagious, largely because people infected with the delta strain can carry up to 1,000 times more virus in their nasal passages than those infected with the original strain, according to new data.

At the onset of the pandemic, in March 2020, SARS-2 was alleged to be 1,000 times more transmissible than SARS-1.  And today, the hot story is that the Delta variant is 1,000 times more transmissible than the original strain of SARS-2.  Which would make it 1 million times more transmissible than SARS-1.

But what does that really mean?  In the real world, more transmissibility is generally associated with lowered virulence.  And that is precisely the case when you compare SARS-1 and SARS-2, and the Delta versus the original Covid strain.  Each has considerably less virulence than the earlier coronavirus.

It means the Delta variant might be as transmissible as the flu. And it happens to be the least virulent of the seven variants being evaluated in the UK. 

Now that you have gotten everyone's attention, you throw in some quotes from the CDC Director, who happily obliges with more meaningless drivel.

“The delta variant is more aggressive and much more transmissible than previously circulating strains,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky told reporters at a briefing Thursday. “It is one of the most infectious respiratory viruses we know of, and that I have seen in my 20-year career.”

Aggressive sounds pretty bad, but what does it mean?  In fact, it has no medical meaning. The claim of high transmissibility is repeated, while nothing else is being said.

How transmissible is flu?  CDC states that between 3% and 20% of Americans get the flu each winter, within a brief 3 months. Delta is presumably in the same ballpark.

The stage has been prepared. The CDC Director has opined on the latest horribleness. The audience is nervous and paying full attention. 

What comes next appears to be from a reliable source.  But in fact, it came out of left field.  There is no source.  No attribution whatsoever.  

CNBC stated:

"In hospitals around the country, 97% of people admitted with Covid symptoms are unvaccinated, and 99.5% of all Covid deaths are also among the unvaccinated."

The numbers cannot be verified by the press, or by me, or by anyone who does not have an official list of the vaccinated.  Most people were vaccinated in mass clinics.  The vaccinations are not in their medical records.  There are no insurance claims for the vaccine, which was free.  While the states and CDC do have those lists, somewhere, CDC has previously claimed it could not match the list of the vaccinated to reported post-vaccination deaths to corroborate and evaluate them. 

In the UK, with similar vaccination rates as the US, it was reported that the majority of hospitalizations are occurring in the VACCINATED. This according to Sir Patrick Vallance, the UK's chief science advisor, who is also known as a member of the Fauci Covid origin cover-up cabal.

According to Reuters, Vallance now says he misspoke.

Vallance earlier said at a news conference with Prime Minister Boris Johnson that 60% of people being admitted to hospital with COVID-19 have had two doses of vaccine.

"Correcting a statistic I gave at the press conference," Vallance said on Twitter. "About 60% of hospitalisations from COVID are not from double vaccinated people, rather 60% of hospitalisations from COVID are currently from unvaccinated people." 

When the public has no means of verification, the media (as well as government officials) can say anything they please.  How does 99.5% sound?  There's nothing stopping you. So why not go for broke? And if there is pushback, just change the numbers tomorrow.


Anonymous said...

I would imagine the true vaccine believers feel they are doing the world a favor by ginning up the numbers. The idea of the "Noble Lie" has been bantered about recently by Dr. Robert Malone, as he posted this excerpt of an FDA publication printed (ironically) in 1984 regarding the oral polio vaccine:

". . . any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives." p. 23007

Anonymous said...

1.) The truth about vaccines that the CDC doesn’t want you to know!


Anonymous said...

They are pushing too hard and seem offended when you ask certain reasonable and educated questions such as, “Why jab those who have had Covid?” or “Why jab children when no study shows they are carriers or in danger of becoming ill?” Or, why not make available all the tests to see if a person is already carrying the antibodies or T-cells before taking the jab? Also, “If the Delta Variance is so benign, isn’t a blessing to let it rip to reach a natural immunity (aka herd immunity)? If you dare to ask they label you an extremist or anti-vaxxer…and probably a racist, just to throw that one in as well.

Anonymous said...

FAUCI IS BUSTED! Great Video On Fauci!

Anonymous said...


‘Urgent’ British report calls for complete 'cessation of COVID vaccines' in humans

Anonymous said...

Yes, your first 2 questions are critical and covid vaccine true believers I've met often find them baffling.

The 24/7 hype of the " varient dangers " , and MSM cheerleading for EUA vaccines has become relentless.

Anyone who questions the J & J. Moderna, etc. shots is dismissed as fool, Luddite, or Trumpster.

Thank you Dr. Nass for your ongoing efforts to keep people informed!!

Anonymous said...

First let me preface this by saying: I'm incredibly grateful for Dr.Nass's commentary. I check her site almost daily. I haven't gotten the covid vaccine, nor will I. In any case, I'm a physician in Arkansas, affiliated with a large hospital system. The delta variant has been growing exponentially here, clearly on a pace to vastly exceed the # of pts hospitalized at the peak in January 2021 [although the last 2-3 days have strangely leveled off]. Every day, the hospital system sends us email updates, with the typical '99% of hospitalized pts are un-vaccinated-please do the right thing, serve your community & get vaccinated ASAP'. So I decided to fact check. I called one of the hospitalists I know, and she said 32 out of the 34 pts in the covid ward are "unvaccinated" [fully vaccinated?]. Several of the local hospitalists from other nearby facilities have given media interviews clearly stating that with this delta wave, there are many more healthy, younger pts [20s, 30s, & 40s] coming in very ill and dying. They also say "vast majority are un-vaccinated". My contact said the same thing-ie, many more younger, healthier pts coming in than previous wave.

Agree actual stats are hard to come by. I saw an infographic from Thomas Dobbs [@TCBPubHealth] on twitter [Mississippi's top health official], saying from June 7th-July5th, 12% of covid hospitalizations were 'fully vaccinated', and 7% of deaths were 'fully vaccinated'. Unfortunately, I'm almost certain the vast majority of those hospitalized pts were not given ivermectin at onset of illness...

There is also an interesting article yesterday in 'The Times of Israel' by Nathan Jeffay "Israeli, UK data offer mixed signals on vaccine's potency against Delta strain'. The article discusses the possibility that vaccine potency wanes over months...

Anonymous said...

Dr. Nass, my understanding is that the PCR test widely used to determine "cases" is not specific for any given variant, is that correct? And that specific genomic testing is required to identify the presence of a particular variant. If this is true, what percentage of all these new delta "cases" being reported now have actually been subjected to the more rigorous testing to determine the variant? My hunch is that all these numbers being thrown around now, about variants and whatnot, are pretty much just made up. Thank you for the light you continue to shine on this topic!

Anonymous said...

Getting To The Truth – Portugal Shows Us the Way…
'The whole Covid-19 thing is coming apart…'
'Portugal’s “Public Health” Has been forced to reduce their Covid-19 death claims from 17,000 to 15'
Some will recall how, in November 2020, the Court of Appeal in Lisbon, Portugal ruled on a writ of Habeas Corpus that results of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) “tests” 'could not be used to diagnose anyone as ill and / or infectious because the Polymerase Chain Reaction test is not capable of doing so'.
The reason why both the inventor, Dr. Kerry Mullis PhD and all manufacturers state that PCR should never be used for diagnostic purposes is because it is simply not capable of making any such distinction.

Anonymous said...

1.) COVID-19 cure already discovered? Ivermectin ‘can end this pandemic’!
2.) New Study Links Ivermectin To "Large Reductions" In COVID-19 Deaths!

Anonymous said...

‘Vast majority’ of Covid-19 cluster in Cape Cod 'were Vaccinated'!
In Cape Cod, a geographic cape extending into the Atlantic Ocean in Massachusetts, 'the vaccinated are falling ill with Covid-19'. The American town with one of the highest vaccination rates in the state, now has the highest rate of new cases.
'Dr. Janet Whelan, a member of the Provincetown Board of Health, confirmed that the vaccinated could be spreading the Coronavirus:'
'The President of the United States has meanwhile been telling Americans that the vaccines offer complete protection against Covid-19.'??????

Anonymous said...

The FDA stated we have a "pandemic of the unvaccinated" because 99.5% of new CASES, using the PCR test are in unvaccinated people.

However, she failed to mention that CDC has instituted a 2-tiered testing system, whereby medical labs have been ordered to run the PCR cycles to the max for unvaccinated patients, and at a much lower level for vaccinated people. This rigging of the tests procedures gooses up "cases" among the unvaccinated. Cases of course do not mean a person has any illness, or even symptoms - it just cranks the fear factor.

What the FDA really needs to explain is what graphene oxide - a toxic substance that causes EVERY illness being seem in vaccinated people - is doing in these mRNA so called vaccines? Reports for Europe are that they have discovered 98% of the material in the Pfizer injection is graphene oxide - extremely dangerous to human beings. These results have been "Certified" by a highly reputable labs in Spain.

If the FDA wants to dispute these reports, it's time to put up. Otherwise, its time to lawyer up...

Anonymous said...

Here we have an excellent paper by the New York Post
It clearly shows the difference between ''Cases'' and ''Deaths'', that is between fearmongering propaganda and reality

Anonymous said... This is an excellent paper published in the New york Post, telling clearly the difference between ''Cases'' and ''Deaths'', that is between fearmongering propaganda and truth

M.R. said...

Just returned from Barnes & Noble. The latest issue of Foreign Affairs (July/August 2021) contains the article
“The Forever Virus”
which at first I thought would be critical of the panic, but then I read the subtitle:
“A Strategy for the Long Fight Against COVID-19”
I’d brought my trusty pen, primitive but effective. Here is most of the first paragraph:
“It is time to say it out loud: the virus behind the COVID-19 pandemic is not going away. SARS-CoV-2 cannot be eradicated, since it is already growing in more than a dozen different animal species. Among humans, global herd immunity, once promoted as a singular solution, is unreachable. Most countries simply don’t have enough vaccines to go around [me: as if they were effective and or even safe],and even in the lucky few with an ample supply, too many people are refusing to get the shot. As a result, the world will not reach the point where enough people are immune to stop the virus’s spread before the emergence of dangerous variants – ones that are more transmissable, vaccine resistant, and even able to evade current diagnostic tests.”
AUGH!!! We’re all gonna die!
The authors:
Larry Brilliant, Karen Oppenheimer, Augusta Mondel, Rick Bright.
All but the third work for an organization called Pandefense Advisory.


Anonymous said...

Dear Dr. Nass,

I wonder what you think of the math used by CDC described here?

WaffleStaffel said...

"Defining Away Vaccine Safety Signals" by Mathew Crawford

"To a mathematician, everything depends on definitions. Whatever we state mathematically, the definitions of the terms we use should be traceable back to the axioms of the field we're working in.
"Now, consider what would happen if an extremely dangerous vaccine were introduced that resulted in 20 times as many AEs of all types as all the other vaccines to which it gets compared. The PRR remains invariant in the scaling of adverse events! This means that one vaccine that kills and cripples 20 or 50 or 1,000 times as much as a very safe vaccine will show the same PRR, and no safety signal will be identified by the CDC. By design."
"At some point, when the potential for conflicts of interest are high and the point of failure is fundamental to the task of those doing the job, incompetence should no longer be differentiated from criminal intent."

M.R. said...

An Anonymous above (July 24, 2021 at 3:41 PM) recommends a video claiming that the vaccines contain graphene oxide, even mostly graphene oxide. This is mistaken, possibly even a hoax designed to make vaccine critics look ridiculous.


Meryl Nass, M.D. said...

I can't comment on the math in the article about safety signals.

But I can say that after Israel reported myocarditis, and after Oracle notified FDA/CDC of elevated rates of myocarditis, and after something like 1250 myocarditis cases had been reported to VAERS, the head safety epidemiology guy at FDA on this, Steve Anderson, said he didn't have a myocarditis "signal" in his data.

What does that tell you? It told me either his data was no good, or the software/algorithms by which they were analyzing the data were no good, or both.

FDA/CDC are still hiding their data. Walensky talked about their of so assiduous data analysis today (to Brett Baier) but only mentioned the 3V's: VAERS, V-safe and VSD. What about the other 8? What happened to FDA's BEST system? It seems to be the worst.

Everywhere you look we have been scammed. Something terrible is happening to the world. Verify everything. (At this point, I'm not sure I would even take a B12 shot.)