I wrote this 3 months ago to stop the FDA/CDC from vaccinating babies and preschoolers. At the VRBPAC meeting the last two days, the members and briefers confirmed that I was spot on in my arguments.

 Below is the original article.  I will append comments regarding the VRBPAC where appropriate--Meryl

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/how-cdc-massages-its-data-in-order

How CDC massages its data in order to terrify parents into vaccinating their babies and preschoolers

IF YOU TORTURE THE DATA LONG ENOUGH, IT WILL CONFESS TO ANYTHING--Ronald Coase

Meryl Nass

Mar 19

This story is about a particularly vile piece of disinformation CDC issued today to push vaccines on the most vulnerable, those humans who are too tiny to say no.

As I have noted periodically for twenty years, and it was roundly confirmed 4 weeks ago in the NY Times, CDC spins and cherry-picks the data it presents to the public, hiding most of what it has. Then it blames its 'outdated' IT systems for the problems, if it gets caught. As the NYT noted, 

The C.D.C. has received more than $1 billion to modernize its systems, which may help pick up the pace, Ms. Nordlund [CDC's spokesperson] said. “We’re working on that,” she said. 

Dr. Vinay Prasad discussed several ways CDC generated bogus conclusions in an article titled, “How the CDC Abandoned Science” in the magazine Tablet last month.

CDC is not a public health agency.  It is a public propaganda agency that collects a massive amount of data. CDC marshals its huge data library to create presentations that support the current administration's public health policies.  CDC also has state of the art PR staff, as well as TV studios, and produces videos, radio spots and an enormous number of press releases that are distributed to the media.  CDC hosts many journalists at its Atlantia headquarters. Free junkets successfully cultivate US health reporters.

A 2007 Senate oversight report on the CDC noted the agency spent $106 million on the Thomas R. Harkin Global Communications (and Visitor) Center, and summarized its 115 page report with the following: “A review of how an agency tasked with fighting and preventing disease has spent hundreds of millions of tax dollars for failed prevention efforts, international junkets, and lavish facilities, but cannot demonstrate it is controlling disease.”

If reporters want to speak directly to a CDC scientist, they must go through the public affairs office. CDC controls the flow of information out with an iron hand.

CDC may pay for getting its messages out.  As we learned last year, it paid Facebook for messaging, while Facebook donated $millions in advertising back to CDC. (Google is not letting me find the link, unfortunately.)  Last March, Mark Zuckerberg stated,

We’ve already connected over 2 billion people to authoritative COVID-19 information, and today as access to COVID-19 vaccines expands, we’re going even further and aiming to help bring 50 million people one step closer to getting vaccinated.

While CDC collects data from a much larger sample size, it often, as in the case I am about to discuss, only presents part of its dataset, and/or (as in this case) CDC chooses a specific, limited timeframe from which to select its data.  

The story that CDC is crafting today is that tiny children, under the age of 5, have been recently hospitalized at extremely high rates due to COVID, and therefore need to be vaccinated as soon as the vaccine is authorized for them. 

• Whereas, the true story is that most children have now been exposed to COVID and are therefore already immunized.  The huge Omicron wave conveyed a huge amount of immunity, which negates the need for vaccinations for the vast majority of us who now have immunity. Admitted by VRBPAC

• Multiple studies have revealed that you are at higher risk of a vaccine-induced adverse reaction if you are already immune--but CDC cleverly never mentions this potential harm, or any other, to parents. Admitted by VRBPAC members and briefing documents

• Many other studies show the immunity derived from exposure is much stronger and long-lasting than from vaccination.  Was not discussed but studies support this

• A theory gaining ground is that vaccination after infection may actually narrow and weaken the protection derived from infection-induced immunity, which may be an important reason to avoid vaccinations in the recovered. Acknowledged as fact by VRBPAC today.  [Igor Chudov explains it here.]

Pediatric hospitalizations are now CDC's golden metric, because, since it has been shown the vaccines do not prevent infection or viral transmission, CDC had to stop saying getting vaccinated protects granny, because it doesn't.  But CDC didn't let that slow them down.  They immediately pivoted to creating stories about preschooler hospitalizations, even though they are rare.  Let's see how this is done.  

The current issue of the CDC's in-house journal, the MMWR, not only discusses hospitalization rates, but provides a downloadable poster that it hopes will be placed in pediatric clinics throughout the country.  Here it is:

Hospitalizations five times as high!  That's terrible!  Omicron must be much more severe for preschoolers than we were led to believe!

But wait a sec.  Let's compare the pediatric Delta wave with the Omicron wave using the data CDC provides.

The Delta wave lasted longer than Omicron but had fewer cases at any one time. Delta's wave looked like those old graphs of 'flattening the curve,' while Omicron, being much more contagious, had a much taller peak while its wave ended much more quickly (what you would supposedly see if you didn't flatten the curve).  Actually, Omicron proved that all the gibberish about vaccines and masks and distancing couldn't flatten Omicron's curve at all.  But I digress.  Despite causing fewer total cases, the Delta wave led to about a third more pediatric hospitalizations overall than Omicron in CDC's dataset (790 vs 572), but they occurred over a longer time frame.   

CDC selected the age group that they hope to immunize soon for a report on pediatric hospitalizations from COVID. CDC has an ongoing data collection system called COVID-Net, from which it receives detailed information on COVID cases from 99 counties in 14 states. CDC’s report states,

“Complete clinical data were available for 97% (2,562 of 2,637) of hospitalized infants and children aged 0–4 years”

But CDC also says that while all hospitalizations were reviewed up until December 2021, for the months of December and January 2022 (the Omicron peak) CDC only reviewed some of the hospitalizations:

"some sites examined clinical data on a representative sample of hospitalized infants and children." 

In other words, CDC compared complete data for Delta with partial data for Omicron. CDC tried to explain away the discrepancy by claiming the partial data was a representative sample. But how did anyone know it was representative if the entire sample was not obtained? No self-respecting journal editor would let CDC get away with this, which is why CDC publishes its own journal, so it can.

In fact, the CDC had already planned its baby-toddler vaccine rollout campaign for February, but had to postpone it when FDA delayed the authorization process on February 10.  It turned out the Pfizer trial supported neither a reduction in cases nor sufficiently high antibody titers in the 2 through 4 year olds to meet the pre-specified level that was thought to be a surrogate for immunity. 

FDA was probably hoping to issue an EUA despite the lack of supporting evidence.  It had an advisory committee meeting scheduled for February 15 to vote on the proposal--until data from vaccinated 5-11 year olds in New York state collected by the NY Department of Health (from 365,000 5-11 year olds) showed the vaccine didn't work, after only a few weeks post immunization.  Somehow, some way, the lid was kept on this critical information after it had been presented to FDA and CDC in early February.  But the story finally got out in a preprint and in the NY Times on February 28, which informed us:

The coronavirus vaccine made by Pfizer-BioNTech is much less effective in preventing infection in children ages 5 to 11 years than in older adolescents or adults, according to a large new set of data collected by health officials in New York State — a finding that has deep ramifications for these children and their parents.  

After about 6 weeks, protection against hospitalization dropped from a purported 100% to 48% in the 5-11 year olds, and protection against infection had dropped to a miserable 12%.

I don't think FDA could then cope with pushing vaccine on preschoolers when it wasn't working in the elementary school kids, whose dose was over 3 times higher.  FDA decided to wait until Pfizer waved its magic wand and produced better data. Brook Jackson, a former manager at a Pfizer COVID vaccine trial site, can explain how that happens.

I'm guessing that in response to the abominable and furthermore official New York state data, which made it very hard to challenge, CDC spun up its spin doctors, resulting in this March 18, 2022 publication and poster.

Below is Table 1 from CDC's March 18 paper, published in its very own, non-peer-reviewed journal, the MMWR. Publishing in its own journal lets CDC get its messages out quickly, and protects CDC's so-called "science" from external reviewers' and editors’ criticisms and comments.  

Since the beginning of the pandemic, there were a total of 2,562 children aged under 5 years who were hospitalized with COVID in CDC's COVID-Net catchment areas in 14 states.  They comprised CDC's data collection.  Nearly half (44%) of the hospitalized children were under 6 months of age, who would be too young to be vaccinated under the proposed EUA.

The average length of their hospitalizations was 2 days during the Delta wave and 1.5 days during the Omicron wave.  Sounds like most kids were not that sick.  The deaths were the same for both Delta and Omicron:  0.5% of the children who required hospitalization died during each wave, although CDC carefully fails to tell us about comorbidities in the children who died or required ICU care.  While it is true that there were more hospitalizations per week during the omicron peak than during the delta peak, this happened because cases were compressed into a smaller time period for Omicron, since the virus whizzed rapidly through the population.  It took longer for Delta to reach its peak and trough, though there were, in total, more pediatric hospitalizations due to Delta than to Omicron. 

CDC managed to spin these data into an appearance of terrible danger for little kids:  5 times as many hospitalizations for Omicron than Delta--but only if you parse the data by week rather than by wave.  And if you parse the data by total number of cases (the area under the curve for each wave) there were many fewer hospitalizations per number of cases for Omicron than for Delta.  (I have posted a NY Times graph, which uses CDC data for cases, at the bottom of this article. The Omicron wave is the mountain at the far right, and the Delta wave is the hillock that preceded it.)

Now that the Omicron wave is over, hospitalizations are way way down. CDC isn't making that part of its message, even though its article came out today and the data have been available for several weeks.  Telling us the current risk for kids is close to zero would ruin the narrative.

I have to vent about one more thing. I am really angry about a lie that CDC placed in its blue poster above.  It says, "Get vaccinated to help protect yourself and those too young to be vaccinated."  Except, since the vaccine does not prevent you catching the disease nor spreading it, how could vaccination protect you or those too young to be vaccinated?  It doesn't, and we have known that since at least August 2021, when Boris Johnson and Rochelle Walensky started to admit it. 

Grasping for talking points, despite being able to spin the data however it pleased, I guess CDC just could not shake itself loose from all its lies...

The bottom line is that the vaccine, designed for the original Wuhan virus, doesn’t do the job—and does it even less well in children. Although the safety data in children are very limited due to the small numbers enrolled in Pfizer’s trials, we know from older children and adults, using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, managed by CDC and FDA, that COVID vaccines are the most dangerous vaccines ever used on a mass scale.

By giving manufacturers a vast liability shield the federal government has incentivized them to rush out their products and provide only the most minimal safety testing—because the way the Emergency Use Authorization law (the PREP Act) is writtten, they can’t be charged with willful misconduct if they did not know in advance about their products’ flaws. They are incentivized to NOT find out nor disclose the safety problems, because under the PREP Act, ignorance is bliss for the makers of EUA products.

Parents whose children are injured by experimental COVID vaccines will never forgive themselves. Please don’t be one of them.

My live blog of the disheartening FDA VRBPAC meeting today. I will be doing this again tomorrow, when the baby vaccines for Pfizer and Moderna are reviewed

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/admin/fda-advisory-committee/fullscreen-chat

Here is the location for the FDA livestream of the meeting

My liveblog can be found on the Children's Health Defense website.  SORRY for providing a broken link earlier:

  https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/admin/fda-advisory-committee/fullscreen-chat

WHO to rename money pox. I kid you not/ Stat

 From today's Stat News:

"... Tedros also confirmed that the WHO is working with partners to devise new names for the monkeypox virus, the disease it causes, and the clades of the virus, which currently are named after the parts of Africa where the corresponding viruses are found in nature.

Over the weekend a group of experts, led by a contingent of African scientists, called for the action, saying that the current names are stigmatizing and do not follow naming rules that the WHO has established."

Do you think the term MONEY POX might have had something to do with this?

Get vaccinated, set an example, then you keep getting COVID. Follow the science. It's cause the vaccine has negative efficacy, dummy.

 AP: HHS Secretary Becerra Tests Positive For COVID-19 Again 

President Joe Biden’s top health official has again tested positive for COVID-19, less than a month after he came down with virus symptoms while on a trip to Germany. U.S. Health Secretary Xavier Becerra woke up with symptoms again Monday morning and tested positive afterward, spokeswoman Sarah Lovenheim said. ... Becerra had joined Biden at the Summit of the Americas last week in Los Angeles. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced Monday that he had tested positive after attending the event, which gathered dignitaries, diplomats and business leaders from across the hemisphere. (Murphy, 6/13)

The Washington Post: Trudeau Again Tests Positive For Coronavirus After Meeting Biden At Summit Of The AmericasPrime Minister Justin Trudeau said Monday that he had tested positive for the coronavirus for a second time, days after meeting with President Biden and several other world leaders at the Summit of the Americas in Los Angeles. ... Trudeau met with several other U.S. officials during the trip, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), as well as the leaders of Argentina, Jamaica, Barbados and the Dominican Republic. Chilean President Gabriel Boric met with Trudeau in Ottawa on June 6. Trudeau also met with Sundar Pichai, the chief executive of Google, and General Motors President Shilpan Amin. Trudeau also tested positive in January. He said he was fully vaccinated and received a third dose of a vaccine that month. (Coletta, 6/13)

AP: US Sen. Wicker Of Mississippi Again Tests Positive For COVIDRepublican U.S. Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi has again tested positive for COVID-19, his office said Monday. ... Wicker, 70, attended the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in late May. Wicker was also diagnosed with COVID-19 in August last year and in February this year. He said in February that he is fully vaccinated against the virus. (6/14)

AP: Ducey Gets COVID-19, Won't Visit Arizona Border With PenceArizona Gov. Doug Ducey has tested positive for COVID-19 and won’t attend a planned political event Monday with former Vice President Mike Pence, his spokesman said. Ducey is asymptomatic and feels well, spokesman C.J. Karamargin said. (6/13)

The American Rescue Plan and the Tyranny it Demands

A friend wrote this interesting piece, which helps to reveal another aspect of how the federal government managed to obtain the compliance of essentially every US jurisdiction.  It further reveals how very large federal grants enforced policies that under normal circumstances would have required a legislative process, public comment period, etc.  But by making new policies conditions of grants, normal procedures for making rules and laws were simply bypassed.

Another thing that happened was that some of the large federal grants came in stages, in which entities receiving the grants had to agree to comply with policies that would only be specified in the future, when later stages of the grant were rolled out. 

 https://www.virginiafreedomkeepers.org/post/the-american-rescue-plan-and-the-tyranny-it-demands

The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) is a multifaceted funding plan that serves as a Trojan horse for tyrannical measures. The ARPA funds have been allocated for every state. Acceptance of these funds requires each locality to blindly follow and implement all CDC guidance. CDC guidance has thus far been just that - recommendations to be used as general guidelines, not law. States, cities, and counties have not previously had to implement CDC guidance without legislative process. However, acceptance of the ARPA funds requires adherence to the CDC guidelines as mandatory without due legislative process. If the terms of compliance are not met, the funding is terminated. The ARPA funds are contingent on implementation of various programs and policies that typically would not be accepted by elected officials.

In this post we will review some of the funding granted to Fairfax and Loudoun counties. In all of the grants provisions measures are in place to ensure the schools are integrated into to requirements. There are set expectations that include implementation of 5G in classrooms, social emotional learning (CRT) and all recommendations for masking/vaccination mandates from the CDC.

The most pertinent concerns with schools

On April 30th, 2021, the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) sent superintendents a letter informing them about the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) & Elementary & Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER 111), whereby the Federal Government plans to give to Virginia $22 million in funds. The deadline for schools to submit their Health and Safety plans was July 30th, 2021.

1. Requirements to get this money to pay for after school programs, enrichment programs, etc. is to open Public schools following CDC "guidelines" to create "unity" across the USA. States and Public School Districts are to update their "policies" every 6 months or when the CDC changes policies. (Private Schools don't need the money so they may or may not be included)

2. School Superintendents accepting the grants were told by the CDC to "seek public comments" but as long as they have accepted funds, they are required to follow CDC guidance no matter the input from parents.

3. These policies currently include: universal masking, physical distancing, contact tracing, isolation & quarantines, diagnostic testing before return, and WILL INCLUDE providing Vaccines to school communities and incorporating a public safety nurse for administration in each school.

4. Schools also have a reporting system which requires reporting that includes sharing "data" on the children.

5. Policy, programs and mandatory guidance will evolve with the continued funding.

Concerns for State, County and Local Governments

Each county that accepts funds will also be required to adhere to the provisions of the grant and accompanying agency standards. HHS and CDC recommendations for state/county/governmental agencies will be mandatory for receipt of funds. These funds must be spent, accounted for and reported back to the issuing authority. Failure to comply with the outlined provisions results in termination of funds and possible refunds to the issuer. In summary, acceptance and retention of the American Rescue Plan Funds is conditional on full compliance with any and all CDC recommendations. This includes implementation of recommended medical mandates...

Go here for the full article.

And below you can see how the federal government tries to enforce its will on unruly states.  Oklahoma also refused to enforce the federal healthcare worker mandate, and was also threatened with withdrawal of funds.

Feds Withhold $1.2M as Florida Refuses to Enforce COVID Vaccine Rule for Healthcare Workers

SunSentinel reported:

As Gov. Ron DeSantis fights COVID-19 vaccination passports and mandates — most recently by threatening the Special Olympics with a $27.5 million fine — there’s one mandate he can’t stop.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is enforcing a federal vaccine requirement for healthcare staff that offers only medical or religious exemptions. The rule, which the U.S. Supreme Court validated in January, contradicts a state law that requires employers to offer broad exemptions that are not allowed by CMS.

Though the Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration has vowed not to monitor or report whether Florida healthcare facilities are following the requirement, that isn’t stopping the federal government from checking. CMS required 100% of eligible Florida healthcare workers to be fully vaccinated or receive an exemption by Feb. 28.

CMS has reduced Florida’s federal allocation of survey and certification funding by $1.2 million and will pay contractors to check if healthcare facilities are following the law, which would typically be the state’s responsibility, a CMS spokesperson said. The agency plans to cut funds to non-compliant states in future years until they start overseeing the vaccine requirement, a Feb. 9 memorandum said.

Brock Juarez, communications director for the Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration, in a Thursday email said the CMS moves do not change the agency’s policy. “1.2 million dollars is a small price to pay to protect the freedom of healthcare workers,” he wrote.

A history of the world since 2019--DEFINITELY don't miss this article/

 https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/a-self-fulfilling-prophecy-systemic-collapse-and-pandemic-simulation/ 

A Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: Systemic Collapse and Pandemic Simulation

Fabio Vighi

How to watch the 4th Doctors for Covid Ethics Symposium

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-iv-freedom-is-the-cure

My first talk on anthrax, Emergent BioSolutions and the biodefense industry starts at 2 hrs 46 minutes 30 seconds. I am also on the panel after the talk.

My second talk starts at 5 hours 35 seconds.  It is about how to win against the Great Reset.  I emphasize the need to call out the many deceitful narratives that have been used to justify the Reset agenda, starting with Global Warming.  I hope you find it interesting.  I am on a panel after this talk also. 

 

Children's Health Defense Tells FDA, CDC, HHS: Dozens of reasons why you cannot authorize COVID vaccines for babies and toddlers

 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/CHD-Letter-to-FDA-VRBPAC-2022-06-10.pdf

The FDA will host 2 days of its vaccine advisory committee meeting June 14 and 15 in order to justify authorizing Pfizer and Moderna vaccine for children as young as six months old.

The CHD letter explains in tremendous detail how the science fails to support the vaccine for children, when looked at from every angle possible.  Vaccinating them makes no sense.  And it introduces significant danger to babies and preschool children.

Please read the letter and share it as widely as possible.  Please hound the FDA, CDC and politicians regarding this proposed crime against humanity.  Here is CHD's website regarding the FDA plan and how to fight it.

Meryl

The Mass Betrayal of Trust / Brownstone Institute

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-mass-betrayal-of-trust/

By Jeffrey A. Tucker   June 9, 2022   

 

In the genre of film known as Film Noir – made in Hollywood during the late 30s and 40s – the defining mark is the loss of trust. Everyone has a racket. Someone who seems good is mostly just pretending. Information about the real story comes at a high cost. No one talks without coercion or payment. Bribes, blackmail, betrayal, and murder are all treated with shocking nonchalance. Seeming innocence is a mask for scam. There are layers upon layers of corruption. To be a cheat is the norm. To exploit another is a way of life. 

The job of the one decent person is to outsmart the evil but he or she only maintains decency by never trusting anyone or anything, and presuming as a rule that all people and things are far worse than they seem. Cynicism is not a pose; it is a principle of survival. 

This genre – very different from the Americana of popular culture before and after – reveals what economic depression and war can do to a people. They not only shatter innocence; they elevate the loss of trust as a cultural habit. Corruption is normalized and institutionalized. It pervades everything and everyone, and therefore affects everything that people think and do. 

The name Film Noir is fitting. It’s dark. And the darkness comes from the mass loss of trust in everything and everyone. No one but criminal elements thrive in such a world. Decent people survive as they are able. And they only do so by recognizing the reality around them, namely that everything and everyone is compromised by the times. 

So it was back then, at least in major parts of the urban landscape of those hard times. 

What distinguishes our own times is something very similar. Corruption and lies: they surround us everywhere. It’s shocking to think how naive we have been. Consider all the things that were generally believed that turn out not to be true. 

For example, we believed that:

• We had a Bill of Rights that protected our freedom of action, speech, religion, and movement, until it was all take away; 

• We had courts that checked overweening powers of government at all levels; 

• We would never have schools shut by arbitrary edict for a virus we knew for sure posed little to no risk to the kids; 

• We had legislatures that would be responsive to the people and not lock their own voters in homes but less allow half the population to be demonized as disease spreaders; 

• We had drug regulators that would thoroughly vet any medication that would be marketed to us by top public health officials; 

• We would never be required to take a medicine we did not want and did not need on the condition of keeping our jobs; 

• The main drivers of the scientific process is evidence and integrity, and this is due to respected editors and guardians of truth;
  
• Major media organs would not set out deliberately to lie to people day after day, month after month, in service of large corporate and government interests; 

• Small businesses, parks, arts venues, and civic associations would never be shut down because they are the heart of American commercial and civic life; 

• We had a Treasury and Federal Reserve that would not deliberately devalue the dollar and drive down the incomes of the middle class; 

• That respected people in top positions coming out of the best universities would not lie through their teeth merely to please financial benefactors. 

• That the First Amendment would prevent the government from colluding with the media to suppress information and muzzle individuals with valuable opinions. 

• The people we trusted the most to call upon in times of need – police, doctors, community leaders, social workers, medical institutions – would not and could not become our most feared oppressors and enemies;
  
• Above all, there were limits to what governments in collusion with private interests could do to us, our rights, and liberties.

We could expand this list without limit. The point is clear. We’ve been betrayed in ways that we never thought possible. 

We didn’t even know the extent to which we once trusted; trust in some measure has long been baked into the experience of American life. Americans generally see themselves as earnest and sincere members of a glorious commercial republic who, despite failings here and there, inhabit a society that is always striving for the good. And yet we now look at our institutions and we are aghast to find that something very different has grown up among us, and in very short order.

And so it’s not just that innocence is gone; it’s that trust has evaporated too. How often now do we respond to the latest news or the latest speech or the latest pronouncement from a once-trusted big shot with a well-earned and cynical dismissal? This seems to be the way it goes today in most aspects of life. 

The darkness featured in Film Noir was never supposed to return. The post-war world and culture were reconstructed to prevent it. People then needed something to believe in again. And so in the 1950s, the church was there. A movement for good government and honesty in politics began in earnest. The “best and brightest” came to power, sporting high credentials and touting their public spiritedness. 

Film, architecture, art, music, and public life generally began to affect a new optimism in an attempt to restore a mythical version of some idyllic prewar past. And that was because no social order can thrive in the darkness of despair. 

This can perhaps be the next stage of our social and political evolution. Maybe. But until those days arrive, we all must live in a world very different from that which we thought existed in 2019. The world that the lockdowns and mandates, and all that is associated with them, unleashed is dark, corrupt, duplicitous, dishonest, dangerous, tribal, and pervaded with nihilism and a loss of moral clarity and a resulting criminality both public and private. 

How easy it turns out to be to shatter trust, to disable a functioning social order, to spread corruption from person to person, institution to institution, to the point that the center no longer holds! I’m quite sure that very few among us knew that. We know now. 

What do we do with that information? We face it bravely, and we vow not to let it last. We can pledge to rebuild.

Riffing on the Schrodinger's Bat problem

COVID vaccine mandates are necessary because the protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn't protect the protected.

But this only works for a few months... then the vaccines pass zero on the efficacy scale and enter negative efficacy territory.  The vaccinated then have an increased risk of infection, compared to the unvaccinated.

Then the only thing that can prevent the vaccinated from being more at risk of COVID infections is getting boosters every few months.

But the boosters can damage your immunity, as noted by Marco Cavaleri, one of the top officials at the European Medicines Agency who, according to Bloomberg,

"warned that frequent Covid-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible. Repeat booster doses every four months could eventually weaken the immune response..."

Scientists are probably working on a treatment for the "too many boosters" problem, but have not succeeded yet. 

Meanwhile, "trust the science," and "trust the experts."  I am sure they will come up with something.

The X Files Presaged the takeover of the world by international elites using weather, electromagnetic, food, surveillance and other tools. 1 minute 40 seconds

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SsnL_K1cd0

The most important study of vaccine efficacy in children, from CDC and NY state, published in JAMA, in 1.3 million 5-11 year olds--got censored by Twitter because it showed efficacy dropped to 12% after 8 weeks and then became negative.

This study covered 365,000 vaccinated NY state children and over 900,000 unvaccinated children, aged 5-11, and it revealed in exquisite detail that the vaccine doesn't work.  No wonder CDC's partner Twitter tried to stop people reading it.  No one who understands what this study reveals would ever vaccinate their child.  The fact that FDA decided to wait 4 months after being briefed on the study -- postponing their review of the vaccines for under 5 year old kids TWICE should tell you something:  they wanted the heat generated by this study to die down, hoping everyone would forget about it by now.  

FDA will hold advisory meetings on June 14 and 15 and then hopes to authorize these worthless vaccines in babies starting at 6 months, for a disease that is generally no worse than a cold and requires dangerous boosters every 4-5 months (according to Pfizer and Moderna) to even give a whiff of renewed efficacy.

Twitter Quietly Removes Warning Added to a CDC Study

https://www.theepochtimes.com/twitter-quietly-removes-warning-added-to-a-cdc-study_4524205.html

 

By Meiling Lee

June 9, 2022 Updated: June 9, 2022

Twitter has removed a warning that it had added to a study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as part of its campaign to limit what it claims to be “potentially harmful and misleading content.”

Twitter and other social networking giants are known to have worked closely with the CDC in controlling the narrative during the pandemic, including suppression of alleged misinformation, in emails obtained by Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in July 2021.

In one of the emails, Twitter offered the CDC free advertising on its Promoted Trend and Promoted Spotlight Trend, with an estimated value of $75,000 and $150,000 respectively.

While in a different email dated March 26, 2020, a CDC representative asked the social media network for assistance in getting its partner organization verified status so that “the COVID-19 messaging they are posted gets the same resonance as other verified accounts.”

Phil Kerpen, president of American Commitment, posted about the recent blunder on Twitter, saying that the network had “slapped a warning on the **Journal of the American Medical Association** for the wrongthink crime of publishing data showing rapid waning of COVID vaccines in children.” Kerpen had posted the study back in May to his account.

The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) is a peer-reviewed medical journal that published the CDC study on May 13, 2022.

When clicking on the link provided on Kerpen’s post on June 8, a message appeared, stating “Warning: this link may be unsafe.”

A screenshot of the Twitter warning for the CDC study on vaccine effectiveness in children and adolescents. (The Epoch Times)

Twitter, JAMA, and the study’s main author did not respond to The Epoch Times’ email for comment.

The CDC study examined the effectiveness of the two-dose Pfizer COVID-19 injection in children (ages 5 to 11) and adolescents (ages 12 to 15) between December 2021 and February 2022 during the Omicron variant predominance.

The authors found that the estimated effectiveness of the Pfizer shot declined significantly in the two groups by the second month after dose two: 29 percent in children and 17 percent in adolescents. When the mRNA shots were issued emergency use authorization prior to any predominant variant, the effectiveness of two doses was 100 percent in children and 91 percent in adolescents.

“Among children and adolescents, estimated VE [vaccine effectiveness] for 2 doses of BNT162b2 against symptomatic infection was modest and decreased rapidly,” the authors wrote.

In the graph provided in the study, near the fifth month after dose two, the vaccine’s effectiveness was negative in the adolescent group, meaning the vaccinated were more likely to have symptomatic COVID-19 than the unvaccinated.

A screenshot of a graph showing the effectiveness of the Pfizer COVID-19 shot in children and adolescents after dose two. (jamanetwork.com/Screenshot by The Epoch Times)

Data beyond two months was not available for children as the vaccine’s effectiveness was only assessed for that short period of time.

Doctors for Covid Ethics Symposium today: Freedom is the Cure: Unpacking & Defeating the Medical Tactics of a World Takeover

Today is the day of the 4th interdisciplinary Symposium

Freedom is the Cure:  Unpacking & Defeating the Medical Tactics of a World Takeover 

In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.  

 

On June 11th 2022, Doctors for Covid Ethics will hold their fourth symposium, hosted by UK Column. The previous symposia were a huge success, not only attracting millions of viewers despite mainstream media censorship but offering content and rigor that has been taken up and built upon by truth seekers across disciplines. 

Watch the livestream: Today, June 11^th : 16.30 CET – 23.30 CET / 15.30 – 22.30 LST / 10.30 – 17.30 ET (Detailed program attached)

With global actors moving to consolidate power in the wake of Covid-19, the focus of the upcoming symposium will be ‘Unpacking and Defeating the Medical Tactics of a World Takeover’.  

Topics to be covered include: 

How and why mRNA vaccines are a serious threat to mankind: Beyond Covid-19, speakers will explain the science and evidence of mRNA technology’s inherent harmfulness, including damage through toxicity and inflammation to the cardiovascular system and effects on fertility, and give an overview of legal actions underway against fraudulently obtained mRNA vaccine approvals.  

                   

Speakers include Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD, Michael Palmer MD, Dr.Thomas Binder MD, Alexandra Latypova, and Renate Holzeisen, Mary Holland, Brian Hooker PhD. with Polly Tommey 

 

The long history of crime and abuse in medicine: What is the real story behind HIV and AIDS? Who was responsible for the Anthrax bioterrorism campaign in 2001? We name names and take a look at the role of psychopathy and a ‘Global Predator’ profile, with a discussion of economic and regulatory considerations.                               

 

• Speakers include Dr.Mike Yeadon BSc, Peter R. Breggin MD, Dave Rasnick PhD, Dr.Meryl Nass MD. and Whitney Webb with Catherine Austin Fitts
  
  The centralisation of power and threats to democracy and sovereignty: Experts examine the extraordinary global powers set to be seized by unelected officials with the imminent WHO “reform”, and the made-to-order pandemics that provide the pretext for potential activation of pandemic creation cycles. Here, we ask in particular: What is really going on with monkeypox?                               

 

• Speakers include Dr. Silvia Behrendt, John Titus, Professor Christian Perronne with Mike Robinson
  
  Beyond medical tactics: What is the solution: Observing the wide variety of excuses for central control further to faked health concerns, solutions and actions must continue to gain ground by fostering Faith in the failure of totalitarianism.                                
• Speakers include Prof. Richard Werner DPhil, Dr Meryl Nass MD and Dr. Peter Breggin MD. with Catherine Austin Fitts  

 
Infertility: A Diabolic Agenda - LIVESTREAM  

 

A documentary film by award-winning filmmaker Andy Wakefield, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Children’s Health Defense. We will learn about a brave Kenyan doctor — Dr. Stephen Karanja — who warned the world that once they’re done with Africa, they’re coming for children and adults everywhere. With perspectives from leading experts expressing their concerns over other vaccines that could cause infertility in women around the world, including the COVID shot. 

 

At every turn, the tactics of world takeover under Covid-19 have been founded upon deception disguised as science. In a remarkably candid admission, Yuval Noah Harari, pundit to the World Economic Forum, The New York Times, the BBC, Harvard, Stanford, Mark Zuckerberg and Barack Obama has said: 

“Science is not really about truth. It’s about power. The real aim of science as a project — as an establishment — is not truth, it’s power.”  

At Doctors for Covid Ethics, we are committed to the pursuit of truth and of ethics in science, medicine, and politics. This is what our fourth symposium is all about.  

 

Watch it live,  

June 11th, 15:30 - 22:30 (BST), 16:30 - 23:30 (CEST), 10:30 - 17:30 (ET)  

UKC: https://www.ukcolumn.org/    and  CHD TV: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/.

FDA Twice Delayed Holding an Advisory Committee Meeting for Kids under age 6 months-60 months (Pfizer) and 6months-72 months (Moderna) June 14 and 15

I will live blog both meetings at Childrens Health Defense website (and will provide the link here when I get it).

Children's Health Defense (CHD) has a campaign about this.  Start here to see what you can use in your own education campaign with others.

Yesterday, CHD premiered a 30 minute movie about induced infertility in young African women due to vaccines deliberately spiked with human chorionic gonadotropin that you probably don't want to miss.

Is the US/NATO muscle going to be sidelined by a multipolar world? Will debtor nations refuse to pay up in the current climate of inflation and privation?/ Dr. John's blog

 https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/imperial-summer-vacation?s=r

Another goodie from Dr. John Day:

Eric Zuesse has this analysis:  THE AMERICAN EMPIRE IS BEING DEFEATED; ASIA WILL LEAD THE FUTURE.

I agree with the first part, but the second part remains to be seen. Maybe "Asia" is not such an entity. Maybe the future really will be distributed and "multipolar".

 Zuesse points out the assassination attempt against Turkey's President Erdogan in 2016, carried out by US-aligned Turkish military officers. Russia saved him at the last minute. The NATO-member veto on new members being approved prevents further NATO expansion while Erdogan lives and cooperates with Russia. It largely incapacitates NATO, since Turkey is in a critical position, controlling black Sea and Mediterranean access, and pipeline transit routes to Europe.

  Zuesse does not bring up that Turkey stands to have a much elevated position in a new Eurasian world-economic-order, firstly since it will be able to repudiate it's vast $US denominated debts, but also because Turkey is likely to be less frequently insulted, and given better consideration than the US does. In a new regime, Erdogan clearly sees growth potential for Turkish power and influence.

  In the near term, a hobbled NATO will not act as global enforcer. In the longer term, the $US slipping in global reserve-currency utility will cut funding for the global American military project. This summer, with the shortages of food and oil, and the $US being more expensive for debtor countries, Western finance seemingly plans to extract the wealth producing assets from more countries, and enforce austerity on their starving citizens, replaying the Asian Economic Crisis, though this is an ancient financial grab. Banks make loans for interest, but they really want to take the collateral/property..."

For the rest, go to   https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/imperial-summer-vacation?s=r

 

I have to eat my words, sorta. The vaccines are being brought back to damage our smallest kids and those dumb enough to believe FDA's word that Novavax has produced an "old fashioned" shot

I wrote an extremely popular article in April.  It got over 50,000 views on Substack, and was republished by Dr. Mercola, Technocracy News and the Epoch Times.

In it, I marshalled a great deal of evidence to support the supposition that the COVID vaccines were on their way out, although I anticipated that the cabal would continue its attempt at world domination using other methods.

I believe they are seriously pulling lots of levers now, and that money pox, artificial shortages of oil, fertilizer, railway cars and baby formula are part of their plan to create economic havoc worldwide, and probably famine in the poorer regions of the world. 

However, despite many indications that they would stop pushing the COVID vaccines, including CDC's admission that 95% of Americans have partial or complete immunity--I think that FDA and CDC were subsequently given new marching orders.

Instead of letting the worthless, dangerous and unnecessary vaccines die a natural death, FDA has turned around and gone whole hog in pushing more shots.

Both Moderna and Pfizer will get a day with the VRBPAC vaccine advisory committee next week, on Tuesday and Wednesday, and I will be live-blogging both meetings.  Two days ago, Novavax finally got its day before the VRBPAC and got the usual approbation from the carefully vetted committee, who voted 21-0 with one abstention in favor of an EUA for the new Novavax kid on the block.  The new kid also causes myocarditis, by the way.  It seems that is simply a side effect of spike vaccines, found in all 3 different COVID vaccine platforms in the US.

The Novavax shot contains a novel adjuvant, by the way, so it is not really an old fashioned shot.  This adjuvant (Matrix-M, derived from Quillaja saponaria) is not found in any other vaccines in the US. While touted as a replacement for the PEG (polyethylene glycol) lipid found in the mRNA vaccines, it is less likely to cause anaphylaxis but more likely to cause autoimmune diseases.

The protein is made from a genetically engineered virus that infects moth cells.  Using insect cells is a way to grow proteins rapidly.  There is one flu vaccine made the same way:  Flublok.  The flu shot was used to try out the insect cell platform (using fall army worms), and Voila--it was ready for showtime when COVID appeared.  How many insect and viral proteins or other molecules are being injected into you (a function of how purified the vaccine is) is unknown.

The University of Nebraska (a major site for biodefense work) spun the Novavax vaccine delicately:  moths and tree bark.  How natural.  Genetically engineered virus produces a spike protein mixed with an adjuvant (well known but never used before in an approved or authorized vaccine) that happened to be developed from a South American tree bark.  Not exactly like nature, I'd say.  Some of the most potent poisons come from South American tree frogs, which are natural but deadly.

I believe the globalists reversed course again.  They apparently had another plan; was it moneypox? but now they are back, wanting to push on with these damn COVID vaccines.  Apparently money pox is not going to send everyone out looking for yet another shot... no matter how many masks CDC asks you to wear to protect yourself from money pox, and then tells you to unwear, because according to the experts, money pox is not airborne.  Oops, the cabal is moving so fast they are getting sloppy.

Why did they have that tabletop moneypox exercise last year, and predict it would spread May 15, 2022?  Why did they add so many mutations that it had to have come from a lab?  Why did they spread it to so many countries at once, when that has never happened before?  Why did they make it so mild, so it is just an annoying rash?  Why did they mess up with the moneypox masking?

Is the cabal being undermined by its own apparatchiks now, who see where this is heading?

I forgot to remind you, but it looks like the smallpox shot (ACAM2000 anyway) causes a LOT of myocarditis.  Don't take it, thinking it will protect you from money pox (there is no valid evidence it will) and then wind up with myocarditis.  One in 30 military servicemembers getting the vaccine for the first time, one dose only, wound up with a subclinical case, and one in 220 recipients wound up with a definite case of myocarditis--about ten times more than you get from COVID mRNA shots, according to data from Kaiser (Katie Sharff paper).

So, I was wrong, and the vaccines are returning.  But Americans, unlike most Europeans, do not want the third, fourth or more shots, and they don't want them for their kids.

The more people who refuse, the less able the cabal is to impose mandates or other punishments.  Stay strong.  The shots are poison and they do not work.

I will be posting Children's Health Defense's letter to FDA on the child vaccines shortly, which is chock full of evidence of the lack of efficacy, danger and utter uselessness of these shots for COVID.  I must continue to ask:  since they don't prevent COVID, what is their purpose?  Why does the government want to inject us so badly?

My talks at the Northern Light/Scandinavian Freedom/CHD-Europe Conference in Malmo (and everyone else's) are now online. It was a great event!

 https://scandinavianfreedom.events/video