Saturday, June 11, 2022

The most important study of vaccine efficacy in children, from CDC and NY state, published in JAMA, in 1.3 million 5-11 year olds--got censored by Twitter because it showed efficacy dropped to 12% after 8 weeks and then became negative.

This study covered 365,000 vaccinated NY state children and over 900,000 unvaccinated children, aged 5-11, and it revealed in exquisite detail that the vaccine doesn't work.  No wonder CDC's partner Twitter tried to stop people reading it.  No one who understands what this study reveals would ever vaccinate their child.  The fact that FDA decided to wait 4 months after being briefed on the study -- postponing their review of the vaccines for under 5 year old kids TWICE should tell you something:  they wanted the heat generated by this study to die down, hoping everyone would forget about it by now.  

FDA will hold advisory meetings on June 14 and 15 and then hopes to authorize these worthless vaccines in babies starting at 6 months, for a disease that is generally no worse than a cold and requires dangerous boosters every 4-5 months (according to Pfizer and Moderna) to even give a whiff of renewed efficacy.

Twitter Quietly Removes Warning Added to a CDC Study

Twitter has removed a warning that it had added to a study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as part of its campaign to limit what it claims to be “potentially harmful and misleading content.”

Twitter and other social networking giants are known to have worked closely with the CDC in controlling the narrative during the pandemic, including suppression of alleged misinformation, in emails obtained by Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in July 2021.

In one of the emails, Twitter offered the CDC free advertising on its Promoted Trend and Promoted Spotlight Trend, with an estimated value of $75,000 and $150,000 respectively.

While in a different email dated March 26, 2020, a CDC representative asked the social media network for assistance in getting its partner organization verified status so that “the COVID-19 messaging they are posted gets the same resonance as other verified accounts.”

Phil Kerpen, president of American Commitment, posted about the recent blunder on Twitter, saying that the network had “slapped a warning on the **Journal of the American Medical Association** for the wrongthink crime of publishing data showing rapid waning of COVID vaccines in children.” Kerpen had posted the study back in May to his account.

The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) is a peer-reviewed medical journal that published the CDC study on May 13, 2022.

When clicking on the link provided on Kerpen’s post on June 8, a message appeared, stating “Warning: this link may be unsafe.”

Epoch Times Photo
A screenshot of the Twitter warning for the CDC study on vaccine effectiveness in children and adolescents. (The Epoch Times)

Twitter, JAMA, and the study’s main author did not respond to The Epoch Times’ email for comment.

The CDC study examined the effectiveness of the two-dose Pfizer COVID-19 injection in children (ages 5 to 11) and adolescents (ages 12 to 15) between December 2021 and February 2022 during the Omicron variant predominance.

The authors found that the estimated effectiveness of the Pfizer shot declined significantly in the two groups by the second month after dose two: 29 percent in children and 17 percent in adolescents. When the mRNA shots were issued emergency use authorization prior to any predominant variant, the effectiveness of two doses was 100 percent in children and 91 percent in adolescents.

“Among children and adolescents, estimated VE [vaccine effectiveness] for 2 doses of BNT162b2 against symptomatic infection was modest and decreased rapidly,” the authors wrote.

In the graph provided in the study, near the fifth month after dose two, the vaccine’s effectiveness was negative in the adolescent group, meaning the vaccinated were more likely to have symptomatic COVID-19 than the unvaccinated.

Epoch Times Photo
A screenshot of a graph showing the effectiveness of the Pfizer COVID-19 shot in children and adolescents after dose two. ( by The Epoch Times)

Data beyond two months was not available for children as the vaccine’s effectiveness was only assessed for that short period of time.


Anonymous said...

If you want to trust vaccines that had 50% of the test mice die within a week, that’s up to you. The other half were destroyed so the pharmaceutical companies didn’t have to report their failing health because they had already received the EUA.

I guess cancer increasing 550% in one year is just an anomaly. How about autoimmune diseases up; heart, lung, and brain issues up, but this is low because doctors were forced NOT to attribute these issues to the vaccines in the beginning.

I hope reading this gives you that one last burst of bright light before it burns out for good.


Anonymous said...


'All I can say: Very Powerful'! ! 'June 9, 2022'

I also would say, it is something of a milestone in the remaining free world, that these people who have been working consistently, and tirelessly trying to bring out the truths behind the whereabouts of the Corona Plandemic hoax together with many, many other people over the course of 2 years ! Because this final day of Closing Arguments in the series of the Grand jury - is in a way a final statement, a review, a summary of everything wicked that has happened at far too many levels. Also the fact that all this work has been done on lawyers level, not just some obscure "alternative" channel, makes it a special bookmark to keep around as a reference for other people to show.

Yes - it is all a hoax

and these people - together - brought out a manifold of evidence and facts to the world's public ears and eyes. I mean... that's just incredible and amazing work, really !

Reiner F├╝llmich starts with his summary - which is really excellent to listen to of course. Then comes the Indian lawyer Dipali Ojha, followed by the the South African lawyer Dexter L-J. Ryneveldt - and I loved how he was pronouncing his words and sentences - it really gave it a special punch of seriousness - what was done to the Citizens of this World - through deeply terrible crimes.

Fourth in line was the French lawyer Virginie de Araujo-Recchia, but her English was so misaligned to my ears, I had really difficulties to listen to her - and did only half of it (so, instead, i'll listen to the german translation instead, of what she had to summarize).

Then it was followed by Candadian lawyer Michael Swinwood.... Oh, my god... I wonder if not this was by far the most fantastic final speech of all ? (Actually they all were good, honestly, but Swinwood's speech was mighty special) Kind of mind boggling, beautiful and almost spoken in a sort of "poetic justice" revealing way ?

He pulled in history; going all the way back to 1200 something, the Jesuits, the Pope, the Queen, the Spanish seducing the Middle and South Americans with deceit and deception, and that four states in the US not really are US states, but Common Wealth states, with their special jesuit lead phrase containing the word "tyranny" in it (huh !) Anyway, he pulled all that off in a great interwoven speech, which blew my mind. Par excellence - so direct. So... beautifully direct in the face !

In the end comes Lawyer Ana Garner, which too makes a great speech, very direct and reminds us of aspects easily overlooked in the vast flow of (mis)information. In the end spoke Leslie Manookian (but I have not gotten there yet).

I believe this video is a great summarization !