Thursday, November 18, 2021

My interview with Kevin Barrett and an amazing video from Glen Beck. This is where the 2 ends of the spectrum come together.

I used the word "simple" in a peculiar way.  What I was getting at was the simplicity (in my mind) with which one could predict whether someone would want a COVID vaccine based on which party they belonged to or who they voted for to be President.  Was it really that simple for pollsters and political pundits to predict important health decisions based on party?

Kevin reminded me that now everything is being spun through the lens of partisan politics, so maybe I am responding to media spin, rather than reality.

On further reflection, I think that 24/7 propaganda, even when you are not overtly paying attention, has a subliminal effect on people, causing listeners to believe what is being told, after they have heard the same thing many times, even if they aren't consciously aware of it.  So the choice of vaccination would not be one driven by your party affiliation but rather which media you listen to.

Speaking of media, I was strongly urged to listen to Glen Beck last night (which I did for the first time) and it was very gratifying. Please do this, even if he is very difficult to tolerate, because the material is very important.

His team has pulled the story together from the funding of virus discovery and enhancement in Wuhan to the end of western liberal democracy.  Most of the pieces have been scattered through this blog over the past 20 months, but he put it together in one video.


Anonymous said...

This is my first post in my live response ‘blog’.

I’m only about 7 mins into this interview and would like to say that Yes I voted for President Trump but Dr. Nass is the one that convinced me not to take a warp speed ‘vaccine’. Except for flu shots I am fully vaxxed otherwise.

I don’t know how you meant “simple” IE: innocent or stupid but either way I get my information from you regarding the clot shot. President Trump was booed at his own rally in Alabama when he recommended the warp speed ‘vaccine’.

I share your posts on public forums often. You have a lot of Trump supporters following you Dr. Nass. Keep us educated and innocent please.

Anonymous said...

Comirnaty Package Insert Reveals All
Direct from the Comirnaty package insert...


5.2 Myocarditis and Pericarditis
Postmarketing data demonstrate increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly within 7 days
following the second dose. The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age than among females
and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Although some cases
required intensive care support, available data from short-term follow-up suggest that most individuals have had
resolution of symptoms with conservative management. Information is not yet available about potential longterm
sequelae. The CDC has published considerations related to myocarditis and pericarditis after vaccination,
including for vaccination of individuals with a history of myocarditis or pericarditis
( []

5.5 Limitation of Effectiveness
COMIRNATY may not protect all vaccine recipients.

13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
COMIRNATY has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or impairment of
male fertility. In a developmental toxicity study in rats with COMIRNATY there were no vaccine-related
effects on female fertility [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].

Obviously they are well aware of myocarditis, pericarditis, otherwise they wouldn't have included it in the insert. They also admit that vaccine "may" not work. It is quite obvious that there have not been sufficient studies to rule out carcinogenicity, genotoxicity etc. They admit that they have no idea what it does to fertility in males. They admit that female fertility has only been briefly and incompletely studied in rats (no long term).

And all this is for the one that has actually been "approved". Of course there is much more in the insert that reveals the absolute lack of proper safety evaluation. But you can research the Pfizer EUA insert as well...

Bottom line. There is absolutely no justification for this being mandated. There really isn't any justification for administration at all, as there is nothing here that demonstrates that the risks outweigh the benefit, especially for a supposed illness, with an IFR of .15 or less for the majority of individuals. Never has the groundwork been better laid for a health disaster of unimaginable proportions. Every day this continues only demonstrates that there is truly no rule of law. But I guess most of you already knew that

Anonymous said...

Following the science? COVID research undermines mandates, cancel campaigns against doctors.

Large health system suspends, trashes doctor for opposing COVID vaccine mandates as 'evidence for natural immunity grows stronger'.

Anonymous said...

Declaration of Independence: A Transcription | National Archives

Anonymous said...

Second post in my live response ‘blog’

Approximately 26 mins - the Wuhan flights are discussed but we all seem to forget that during 2020 there was a massive illegal immigration push globally. Every ‘western’ country was affected by this and mysteriously by fall 2020 / winter 2021 Covid is a global problem. You mentioned the quick coordinated global response well think back to the global migrant rush on every border. In fact think about the migrant rush right now on US southern border and dead of night flights to cities near you. How many hundreds / thousands have been flown into Portland, Maine? This is a problem because they are in contact with social workers and those social workers are in contact with the rest of us through second jobs, and / or their children who are in contact with teachers who have families and the path from some origin to general population is able to continue.

Public Health Scotland COVID-19 Statistical Report
As at 25 October 2021
Publication date: 27 October 2021
Pg 41

Approximately 32 mins - you mention the EUA and need to report side effects. Well at least by Oct 2020 a lot of those side effects have been reported by FDA. It’s like the public notice in the back of the newspaper on a foreclosure though, you have to be paying attention.

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory
Committee October 22, 2020 Meeting Presentation
Slide 16

Thank you for everything you do! WE love you Dr. Nass!

Anonymous said...

'If the Covid Vaccine Protects, How Are the Unvaccinated a Threat?'

Anonymous said...

'Big Pharma Is Developing an Ivermectin Clone—Pfizermectin—as a Substitute for the Failed Covid Vaccine'.

Anonymous said...

The Glenn Beck video was very informative and really did connect a lot of important dots, but missed some key points. The justification per Dr. Fauci for his funding the research of animal viruses, is to develop vaccines to protect the public IF a virus jumps from animals to humans. What was not mentioned is the fact that other scientists have examined the SARS-CoV2 virus, and have concluded that it would have taken at least 1,000 years for evolution to result in the gain-of-function seen in SARS-CoV2. Thus, the motive from Dr. Fauci is a flat out lie. The purpose of the NIAID / NIH funding SARS-CoV2 was clearly to create a pathogen/bioweapon - there can be no doubt given the hyper-acceleration of evolution evident in SARS CoV2.

With the above understanding, and the fact that more than a decade of research went into SARS CoV2, it is also very clear that the “leak” just shortly after Bill Gate’s “final” Event 201 walk-thru at Johns Hopkins is simply too coincidental to be credible. Thus, one must conclude the SARS-CoV2 virus was released, in accordance with all the years of planning by Gates,Fauci, and others.

Anonymous said...

I believe there is a segment of people that just do what they are told by whomever is in charge. I believe there is also a segment of people who do what their perceived "group" does, so they can "fit in". I also believe there is a segment of people who can be bullied into doing something because it is difficult and sometimes impossible to stand alone if you have others depending on you. And then there are the critical thinkers. In that group, some have had the shot and some have not, but ALL believe in the right to choose for themselves, based on whatever sources they use to make an informed decision.

The gatekeepers at my Doctor's office sent me a "You need to get a Hepatitis C shot" scare gram. I've never been exposed to Hepatitis C, or around anyone exposed to it. It isn't likely it will ever happen if it hasn't already, unless I can expect to contract it in a hospital if I have to go. Why would I get a shot I do not need? My doctor agreed, and explained scare gram tactics. (I'll miss him when he retires)

Anti mandate is not anti vax or anti shot. Not wanting to get a shot that has no benefit for personal you (if you already have better antibodies and t-Cells, etc than the shot can give you), or benefit for anyone around you (since everyone can get and spread Covid, with or without a shot) and yet can cause personal harm is just intelligent thinking.

It has zero to do with party, unless there are certain parties that only have sheep and no critical thinkers. Grouping people by "if they are x, then they must be y" is prejudicial and discriminatory right there.

Anonymous said...

If you recall the Options the (Vaccine Cabal?) were giving Trump was either shut down America for three to four years or develop a Vaccine? He also supported Therapeutics, and he did bring in Dr. Atlas, which the Fauci crew fought him every inch.

Plus the Vaccine Cabal also suppressed Hydroxy, and Ivermectin, we need big Lawsuits on that. Hydroxy okay for Malaria, Lupus, but not okay for Covid? Why No Covid in Africa, wide scale use of Hydroxy, and Ivermectin?

Anonymous said...

Fauci is still in power. He is evil. We are all still at risk.

Anonymous said...

'Shocking UK Study Stuns Medical Community: Vaccinated People 60 and Younger Are Twice As Likely to Die as Unvaccinated People'.

Anonymous said...

HUGE: CDC and Big Pharma Data Confirm that More Children will Die from COVID Vaccine than from the COVID Virus.

Anonymous said...

The Chinese Sent the Code to Make the Vaxx You Took.
That's why the CCP said they Won the Biological War with USA..
Don't bother to verify code sent by Chinese who started the whole pandemic.

Article 6 Section 3 - Nuremberg Code for dummies.

Anonymous said...

So, according to the Glen Beck timeline, all this began on Dubya's watch (i.e., George W Bush, 2000-2008) and ramped up to "Warp Speed" on Trump's watch (2016-2020). This is not a partisan issue.

Anonymous said...

Eh. Glen is a bit sketchy on the science. I don't fault someone who has no training in the biological sciences for not understanding key parts of it. However, if you're presenting an exposé in which the science is critical, you'd best make sure you get the science right.

Here's just one example (selected simply because it's the point at which I decided to stop watching): if this were a wild virus that jumped from bats to humans, then it doesn't surprise me in the least that researchers could not cause COVID-19 to manifest in bats by exposing bats to the virus (the claim Glen makes) -- because natural reservoirs seldom, if ever, show signs of disease from that pathogen. The natural host (in this example, a bat) tolerates the presence of the pathogen, hence its status and function as a natural reservoir of that pathogen.

But what if the research Glen was citing (without substantiation) actually showed that SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID) does not infect bats very easily under experimental conditions? That puts a whole different complexion on things. It says that the virus is very unlikely to have come from bats, when what he actually said indicates that the virus could very well have come from bats, who, as natural reservoirs, are resistant to disease caused by this virus.

The details matter here, because the science matters here. SARS-CoV-2 and COVID are not interchangeable terms. They are two different things.

He loses credibility with me when he is imprecise on the science and ends up getting something wrong (in fact, conveying the opposite of what I think he thinks he's saying...) by oversimplifying it. Our arguments hold less power when their foundations are weak.

A second problem I have with his presentation is that he emphasises the public-private partnership between the US government and Moderna (which is indeed disturbing, given Moderna's dismal track record and the amount of money involved) -- but it's Pfizer that is leading the pack, in FDA authorisation for various age groups, licensure, distribution, use, and profits.

Worldwide, AstraZeneca and Pfizer are the leaders in COVID vaccines; Moderna is currently a distant fourth, in terms of the number of countries using the vaccine (181 countries for Oxford-AZ, 149 countries for Pfizer-BioNTech, 85 countries for Sinopharm-Beijing, and 81 countries for Moderna;

I could go on. He's certainly upped his game since he was on Fox News (way back when it was still watchable -- Shep, I miss your pre-dyspeptic days!). Glen Beck is worth watching in this video for his now-masterful delivery, but not for its content.