Monday, June 14, 2021

The Vaccine Passport being rolled out in a large state near you: California and NY vs Florida and Texas

Late last week, California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced that the state would soon be rolling out a new "vaccine verification system" for private businesses that may be akin to a vaccine passport.

During an event in San Francisco on Monday, Newsom clarified that the "system" will essentially just be electronic vaccine cards that individuals can keep on their phones as opposed to carrying around the paper card.

"It’s not a passport, it's not a requirement, it's just the ability now to have an electronic version of that paper version, so you'll hear more about that in the next couple of days," he said.

Once the state fully reopens without capacity limits Tuesday, businesses can require individuals to show their vaccine cards to prove they do not need to wear a mask. California is adopting the current CDC guidance that vaccinated individuals do not need to wear a mask in most settings.

Some states have banned the use of vaccine passports, while most others neither ban nor require them.

New York is offering an "Excelsior Pass" — an electronic proof of vaccination developed by IBM — that some businesses in the state are requiring for entry. The New York Times reported that the state plans to expand the program going forward, with the state possibly using the system to verify a resident's age, driver’s license status and other health records.

Newsom will announce California's version of this electronic system later this week.


Anonymous said...

Dr. Nass,

Could you please comment on the Bio-distribution data for the Pfizer vaccine.

The only place that I have seen this graph is in the body of the article written by Steven Kirsh which was published on Trial site news website - the link is below.

Apparently, this was known by Pfizer, during the EUA process and Pfizer was not forthcoming with this data. This data was obtained through a Freedom Of Information Act request.

My understanding is that the vaccine was not supposed to move about the body. Yet it accumulates in the bone marrow and ovaries. Can you comment on the meaning of this for pregnant woman and the possibility to cause birth defects, and if this may cause sterility in females etc.


Meryl Nass, M.D. said...

My understanding of the biodistribution data is that the graph was not part of the Pfizer information package.

The information I think came from what Pfizer supplied to the Japanese government. The FDA almost certainly had it, but it was not made available by FDA.

The biodistribution data were not gathered from injecting the vaccine into rodents. Instead, 2 components of the lipid nanoparticle ONLY were injected, and this is where they ended up. We are presuming that the same happens with the actual vaccine.

What happens in a roduent is not necessarily what happens in a person. And the 2 LNP ingredients are not the same as injecting the vaccine.

These data are possibly irrelevant. But they are worrying. Why wasn't better data demanded by FDA? Very limited autopsy data suggests the mRNA goes everywhere, based on PCR tests from a few human organs.

So what harm might the vaccine do to humans? Those data are being hidden from us by FDA and CDC, which are lying about their access to data, based on claims made on December 10. They appear to have reduced the data they collect and/or analyze, which is effective at hiding the real facts.

For example, last Thursday Shimabukuru of CDC presented data on myocarditis that was very convincing re vaccine causality. Then FDA's Anderson claimed he didn't know if the vaccine caused myocarditis based on the data he was analyzing.

They are running a shell game. We don't know what damage the vaccines may cause but I would guess the answers are so devastating that these agencies are doing somersaults to hide it.

Unknown said...

Good afternoon Dr. Nass,

My name is Mahalia Mehu, I was just accepted into the World History PhD. program at St. John's University; at the Queen's campus for Fall 2021. Today, via email, I received a notice stating that I must have proof of vaccination to attend classes on campus. Having heard from multiple sources, including your show, of the side effects and lack of efficacy of the vaccine, I wished to wait until it was no longer experimental but rather FDA approved. What do you suggest I do? How should I proceed?

Thank you in advance!

Mahalia Mehu

Anonymous said...

This Californian will be actively avoiding businesses that make use of the non “Covid passport” app that Governor Newsom seems to have single handedly imposed on the state. Just another reason to vote for his recall as far as I’m concerned. I also might turn into an activist and show up en mass claiming we left our phones in the car or at home.

Any restaurant that insists on the app will just lose my business. I don’t care about concerts or movie theatres. I think most of the grocery stores have already decided to just use the honor system. If it impacts my life too much I will consider moving to a more free state.

The overreaction by policy makers to this essentially really bad flu virus that mostly effects the elderly, in firmed and obese needs to end. We can’t live in fear forever; eventually we all die.

Meryl Nass, M.D. said...

Mahalia, the first thinkg you should do is spend 3 hours watching the Bret Weinstein, Dr. Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch video on the vaccines.

That should convince you of the considerable vaccine dangers. If it doesn't, get vaccinated.

If it does, tell Queens that they cannot mandate these vaccines while in EUA status, according to the case cited in the WSJ report I posted yesterday, in which I happen to have been involved.

Then spend Friday watching the CDC's ACIP meeting that will discuss giving the vaccines to children. You will learn more about the admitted side effects. I will be live-blogging the meeting.

You might then want to stayrt collecting fellow students and faculty and initiate an action against the university, if they have not soon backed down.

Anonymous said...

Passport Issues Example July 1 Covid Traveling to Iceland Policies

June 15 Covid Traveling to Iceland Policies

Previous Covid Traveling to Iceland Policies

John said...

Wonder why, what reasons Iceland changed distancing from 2 meters 6.56 feet to 1 meter 3.28 feet?

John said...

Masks must be worn wherever the 1-metre social distancing rule cannot be kept between individuals who are not closely linked. The obligation to wear a mask does not apply to children born 2005 or later.

Face masks shall be used where ventilation is poor and where a 1-metre distance is not possible. They shall also be used where it is not possible to ensure a 1-metre distance limit such as in health services, domestic flights and ferries, public transport, taxis and coaches, in practical driving lessons and flight training, hairdressers, beauty salons, massage parlours, tattoo parlours, dog grooming salons, tanning salons and other similar activities. Face masks shall cover the nose and mouth.

Exempted from masks are those individuals who have already been infected with COVID-19 and completed isolation. Furthermore, those who do not have the understanding or maturity to use a face mask correctly or are unable to do so for other reasons, such as health reasons, are exempt from the obligation to wear a mask

Pls ongoing inconsistency of “pandemic rules” such as example here if not understood exempt from requirement for the reported deadly virus? Here out west masks no longer required without much explanation why required for months on end along with many not vaccinated along with many not yet eligible for vaccine with currently changes making unvaccinated for pressure as outsiders while vaccinated insiders
express no concerns back to ordinary no masks required even though defies masks rules defy basic logic if needed or not. Many still where masks with vaccinated less concerned with obvious inconsistencies adding pressure to unvaccinated while ads run urgency to get vaccinated including for healthy young reported at zero serious virus risk while some million reports for vaccine side effects including serious effects?

Overwhelming. Treatments for the acute chronically deliberately overwhelmed will be needed if can find effective resources for some of this will likely be in long lasting need from extended traumatic events and fall out all around.