Time Magazine has hosted 22 thinkers doing short pieces on the Great Reset. The thinkers include the head of the IMF (who wants to apply green stress tests to her loans), Harry and Meghan (calling out misinformation) and disgraced ex-PM Tony Blair (calling for global cooperation). Sadly, it's no joke.
1. Robert F Kennedy Jr. wraps up everything in 18 minutes--the best speech I have ever heard
https://www.instagram.com/p/CGtCdRJn-IN/
2. Vandana Shiva tells Joe Mercola the background to the current state of things, how Indian farmers successfully fought back, gives us perspective and hope
3. James Corbett explains the Great Reset, which is the rebranding of technocracy and central control, for the sake of central control
https://www.corbettreport.com/greatreset/
4. Shoshana Zuboff explains how social media companies'surveillance of our online behaviors have taught them to read our emotions and fears to sell us products, candidates, and more. Does this help explain why there is such a great divide in the US?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIXhnWUmMvw&ab_channel=vprodocumentary
5. Nazism, COVID-19 and the destruction of modern medicine: An interview with Vera Sharav, Part One
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_EDV_7s7Dc&feature=emb_title&ab_channel=StandforHealthFreedom
Here's the one hour video:
https://www.facebook.com/13341879933/videos/1054051221691661/
Ronnie Cummins and Alexis Baden-Mayer of the Organic Consumers Association were wonderful to speak with about Covid-19, its murky origins, and the murky response. Both the Organic Consumers Association and I are trying to get out critical information to the public on all aspects of coronavirus and the pandemic.
I encourage readers to consider signing one of two petitions calling for a ban on biological warfare (a.k.a. gain of function) research:
1. For doctors, lawyers, scientists and policy experts to sign
2. For everyone else to sign
----------------
With respect to a comment about me being the only person saying this is a lab-derived organism, that is hardly the case.
I would say, instead, that Andersen K et al. in Nature Med last March is the only scientific paper claiming it isn't. And that paper has been widely criticized, not only by me but many others. It makes no sense, among other things.
A recent 48 page summary of much of the evidence, citing the work of many scientists, is here:
https://changingtimes.media/2020/10/12/sars-cov-2-lab-origin-hypothesis-gains-traction/
There is plenty of evidence for a lab origin on my blog, going back to late March. I have since moved on to analyze other aspects of the pandemic.
In my state of Maine, 61% of deaths occurred in long-term care facilities. In our next-door neighbor New Hampshire, 81% of deaths occurred in these facilities.
On April 21, 2020 the United States reached the maximum number of patients hospitalized with Covid-19:
Only a tiny number of hospitals were overwhelmed, and by the time temporary staff arrived in several weeks to help out, the peak was over and they were not needed.
On October 19, nearly 6 months later, we have
37,744 hospitalized with Covid-19. This is 63%, or 5/8ths of what we had at peak. Yet the dire warnings are back. STAT News, a Boston Globe spin-off, is also an outlet that gets paid to plant articles.
STAT's latest headline reads, ‘At a breaking point’ : New surge of Covid-19 cases has states, hospitals scrambling, yet again.
The truth? The US has over 746,000 staffed hospital beds. Covid cases are filling 5% of them. So, while there may be a hospital here or there that has more than its share of cases, all that is required is to transfer some patients, and/or redirect ambulances, and close the hospital briefly to admissions. This is done all the time. It started decades before anyone ever heard of SARS-1 or SARS-2.
STAT is at it again, ginning up the fear whenever it can. We now know how to take care of these patients, unlike during the peak in April. (See earlier posts on Dr. McCullough, Dr. Zelenko's and Dr. Marik's protocols.). Check the statistics for yourself.
Deaths are not skyrocketing either. For the past week, the US has averaged 708 deaths/day, just 39% the average 1823 deaths/day, which occurred during the first week of May.
Some places never had a "first wave" and are having it now. There will probably be many bumps as first waves occur in areas that were not significantly hit earlier. Expect them. Treat them correctly, and there should be very few deaths and very few chronic problems.
Don't just treat those at "high risk"--treat everybody with symptoms, to protect them from a potential chronic condition. That is the job of doctors, to treat patients using the best methods, not to march in lockstep (goosestep) with government advice. The government's terrible advice, the NIH Covid treatment guidelines, made remdesivir the standard of care, despite all evidence to the contrary; and said that HCQ should not be used, again defying the evidence. The NIH Guidelines were shepherded through by Fauci's capo (enforcer), cochair Clifford Lane, by including 16 members who had financial conflicts of interest with remdesivir's manufacturer, Gilead. (Nine of the 16 had such conflicts but ended them before the past year, allowing them to avoid being listed on the current NIH disclosure form.)
These "guidelines" defy reason, and have killed off lots of Americans. Are we Nazi doctors or are we real doctors?
From ABC News:
As of Thursday's latest data, there have been 3,400 deaths from COVID-19 in South Carolina.
Officials said that many of those had one or more other conditions:
Has Fauci ever said he was sorry? Admitted he was wrong? Apologized for wasting many of our billions on his illusory HIV vaccines? Said maybe it wasn't such a good idea to fund the Wuhan Institute of Virology? Just a reminder, below, of how he faked a remdesivir trial. I won't even start on how he faked the NIH treatment guidelines for Covid, killing thousands of Americans.
Somebody, please replace this fraud.
| Vaccine coverage * | Vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09† | Vaccine effectiveness against influenza B/Victoria† | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Group | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI |
6 months-4 years | 75.5 | 74.5–76.5 | 28 | -6–52 | 57 | 34–72 |
5-17 yrs | 60.2 | 59.5–60.9 | 22 | -4–41 | 35 | 18–48 |
18-49 yrs | 38.4 | 37.6–39.2 | 26 | 9–39 | 45 | 30–56 |
50-64 yrs | 50.6 | 49.2–52.0 | 40 | 20–56 | 44 | 0–68 |
≥65 years | 69.8 | 68.6–71.0 | 42 | 9–64 | 34 | -40–69 |
*Estimates from FluVaxView. (12)
†Estimates from US Flu VE Network. (13)
Scientist’s Working Group on Chemical and Biologic Weapons
Center for Arms Control and Nonproliferation
February 17, 2014
Introduction: The danger to world or regional public health from the escape from microbiology laboratories of pathogens capable of causing pandemics, or Potentially Pandemic Pathogens (PPPs) has been the subject of considerable discussion1,2,3,4 including mathematical modeling of the probability and impact of such escapes5 . The risk of such releases has generally been determined from estimates of laboratory infections that are often incomplete, except for the recent 2013 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) report6 , which is a significant source of recent data on escapes from undetected and unreported laboratory-acquired infections (LAIs).
This paper presents an historical review of outbreaks of PPPs or similarly transmissible pathogens that occurred from presumably well-funded and supervised nationally supported laboratories. It should be emphasized that these examples are only the “tip of the iceberg” because they represent laboratory accidents that have actually caused illness outside of the laboratory in the general public environment. The list of laboratory workers who have contracted potentially contagious infections in microbiology labs but did not start community outbreaks is much, much longer. The examples here are not “near misses;” these escapes caused real-world outbreaks.
Methods of pathogen identification
Modern genetic analysis allows pathogens to be identified, and given a sufficient catalog of isolates of the same pathogen, it is possible to determine if two specimens are identical or very closely related. Because all pathogens that are circulating in the environment show genetic changes over time, one can date the time the pathogen circulated. For instance, for 20th century human and swine influenza viruses beginning in the 1930s, one can generally place a virus to a particular year. With modern rapid genomic analysis outbreaks can be traced with considerable accuracy: for instance the 2009 pandemic pH1N1 influenza outbreak has been analyzed with confidence limits of branchpoints in its first wave defined within days or weeks, and individual transmission chains can be identified7 .
Example #1: British smallpox escapes, 1966, 1972, 1978
The WHO’s successful effort to eradicate natural transmission of smallpox in the 1970s highlighted the risk that virology laboratories posed as a source of epidemics. This Escaped Viruses-final 2-17-14 2 was clearly demonstrated in the United Kingdom, where from 1963-1978 only 4 cases of smallpox (with no deaths) were reported from smallpox endemic areas, while during the same period at least 80 cases and 3 deaths were the result of three separate escapes of the smallpox virus from two different accredited smallpox laboratories.8 Much of the current policy and practice in biosafety and biocontainment of dangerous pathogens can be traced to the political and professional reaction to these outbreaks.
The UK became a sensitive test system for smallpox laboratory escapes because it ended compulsory smallpox vaccination in 1946. Public sentiment in the UK had always included significant resistance to and apathy towards vaccination, and so by the mid 1960s and through the 1970s a large proportion of children and young adults had never been vaccinated, and many older persons were never re-vaccinated after initial childhood or military vaccinations. Thus the protective herd immunity in the general public, which earlier rendered impotent any laboratory escapes, disappeared. At the same time, the considerable volume of travel and immigration from smallpox endemic areas of Africa and the Indian subcontinent meant that surveillance for imported smallpox cases was required. UK maintained several smallpox laboratories at medical schools for both research and to support clinical diagnosis.
The first laboratory outbreak to be recognized began in March 1972, in a 23 year old laboratory assistant at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who had observed harvesting of live smallpox virus from eggs. This had been done on an open bench, as was routine, the laboratory having no isolation cabinets at that time. Before she was placed in isolation, she infected two visitors to a patient in an adjacent bed, both of whom died. They in turn infected a nurse, who survived9.
The recognition of this laboratory escape resulted in several investigations, which led to the establishment of guidelines for laboratories handling smallpox and other dangerous pathogens. These recommendations included handling dangerous pathogens in biological safety cabinets only in certain dedicated rooms by specifically trained and designated personnel. Also guidelines were issued for isolation with dedicated gowns and gloves, and the establishment of proper ventilation facilities to maintain negative pressure in these rooms and cabinets. These recommendations are the direct precursors to the current Biosafety Laboratory (BSL) level protocols.
By 1977 the natural chain of smallpox transmission had been interrupted, and the WHO was in the process of reducing the number of laboratories holding smallpox virus. In August of 1978 a 40 year old medical photographer at Birmingham Medical School developed smallpox, and died. She infected her mother, who survived. She worked in a studio and darkroom that was immediately above the smallpox laboratory at Birmingham Medical School. Investigation revealed that although the long established laboratory had been inspected and approved to handle smallpox virus, it did not have sufficient facilities to meet the new biocontainment requirements, and was scheduled to be decommissioned at the end of 1978. Moreover, work on smallpox had accelerated substantially in order to complete existing projects before the closing, and work with smallpox was performed by laboratory personnel who did not receive appropriate training and supervision, and Escaped Viruses-final 2-17-14 3 appropriate isolation practices were frequently violated. The most likely route of exposure of the Medical Photographer was by transport of infectious aerosols generated by a centrifuge through building ventilation ducts that were improperly sealed and allowed aerosols to be delivered to one of the Photographer’s working spaces. Laboratory notebooks and the photographer’s work logs indicated that the strain infecting the photographer was handled in the laboratory on the same days that the photographer worked in the potentially contaminated workspace, on dates consistent with the photographer’s calculated exposure date. Dr Henry Bedson, a world renowned smallpox investigator who was responsible for the Birmingham laboratory, committed suicide as a result of the outbreak (Shooter 1980).
The 1978 investigation re-examined a 1966 smallpox outbreak, which in retrospect was strikingly similar to the 1978 outbreak. The earliest case identified in 1966 was in a medical photographer who worked at Birmingham Medical School in the same facility as the 1978 case. This outbreak was caused by a low-virulence strain of smallpox (variola minor), and it caused at least 72 cases of smallpox from February to August 1966, spread through the midlands of Britain, and Wales. The vast majority of cases were in unvaccinated children or young adults. There were no deaths. Retrospective review again revealed variola minor had been manipulated in the smallpox laboratory at a time appropriate to cause the infection in the photographer working a floor above.
Example #2: The “re-emergence” of H1N1 human influenza in 1977...
To finish this very important article, go to: https://armscontrolcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Escaped-Viruses-final-2-17-14-copy.pdf
https://www.evms.edu/media/evms_public/departments/internal_medicine/Marik-Covid-Protocol-Summary.pdf
Critical Care Covid Management Protocol, updated Sept. 28 by Marik et al.
HCQ was omitted, I am told, to avoid controversy. These are effective treatments also.
UPDATE: According to Eric Schneider, MD in the July 25 NEJM, page 300, "The most recent congressional rescue package features $25 billion for testing." So, in the absence of regulation, if you wanted to make a quick killing, all that was needed was to develop a Covid test and offer it in the US between March and October. Read on.
On January 5 the Chinese scientist who sequenced the first known SARS-2 genome uploaded it to a US database and to the WHO. Within the first 10 days of January a sequence for the Chinese SARS-CoV-2 virus was widely circulated by Edward Holmes of Australia. (He coauthored the March Nature Medicine commentary I criticized here and here.) Holmes works closely with Chinese scientists who passed the sequence to him, possibly without CCP authorization. Here the GISAID international database explains the origin of its reference SARS-CoV-2 strain.
China, Denmark, France, Hong Kong and Singapore recommend social distancing of 1 meter, and many people also choose to, or are required to, wear face masks in public spaces.
Australia, Belgium, Greece, Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal advise people to keep 1.5m apart. Switzerland this week also reduced the required distance to 1.5m from 2m.
"The wide range of clinical manifestations of the disease ... makes conveying the dangerousness of Covid-19 incredibly challenging," Fauci said in an October 13 interview with STAT.
Daszac told Slate, "I’ve found that things like land use, change, deforestation, road building, mining, and agricultural intensification are the reasons we push ourselves into wildlife habitat and get infected."
"in a human-dominated world, in which our human activities represent aggressive, damaging, and unbalanced interactions with nature, we will increasingly provoke new disease emergences. We remain at risk for the foreseeable future. COVID-19 is among the most vivid wake-up calls in over a century. It should force us to begin to think in earnest and collectively about living in more thoughtful and creative harmony with nature..."
March 3 (daily average February 29-March 7)
April. 1376 (daily average March 31-April 7)
May 1823 (daily average April 30-May 7)
June 788 (daily average May 3-June 7)
July 525 (daily average June 30-July 7)
August 1056 (daily average July 31-August 7)
September 817 (daily average August 31-September 7)
October 666 (daily average September 30-October 7)
*CURRENT 810 (daily death avg Oct 21-28)
Data obtained from https://covidtracking.com/data/national
What is not being reported:
We hear about the outliers, like the first US person proven to get Covid twice, but we don't know about the averages. We don't know about how the numbers of deaths from suicides, alcoholism and drug abuse compare to previous years. Are we seeing more deaths from cancer, heart attacks or 'sudden deaths'? These are the data that would allow us to understand the pandemic in perspective. These are the data that are hidden.
The one person who got Covid twice and died was an 89 y/o woman from Holland being treated for a blood cancer.
Have staff working in congregate living settings been fully trained in infection control? Been issued adequate equipment? These important issues are no longer being reported. Why?
How many medical staff are taking prophylactic medications? We know that half a million Americans (not previously on the drug) purchased HCQ in March and April. How many Americans are using it now? Is it affecting outpatient morbidity and mortality? The doctors using it, and willing to come forward, say an unequivocal YES.
Covid data, inadequately reported by CDC, was to be rerouted to HHS. So far, we have heard no improvement in disease reporting. Will we?
