I will be speaking on the anthrax letters and the biodefense/pandemic industry, and on how to turn the Great Reset around. The event will be broadcast by UKColumn.org and by Children's Health Defense TV.
Watch it live,
June 11th, 15:30 - 22:30 (BST), 16:30 - 23:30 (CEST), 10:30 - 17:30 (EDT)
UKC: https://www.ukcolumn.org/ and CHD TV: https://live.
34 cases reported in the US. No deaths to be found. Is this condition even serious? No matter--it's a great excuse for contact tracing! From the Defender:
"Monkeypox “offers a new cause for contact tracing,” Axios reported Tuesday, pointing out that proponents of contact tracing who were disappointed by the tool’s relative lack of effectiveness in mitigating the spread of airborne COVID-19 are now excited about the possibility of putting the technology to use for monkeypox — because the disease is spread through physical contact...
Meanwhile, the efficacy of a monkeypox vaccine is still in question, according to Ira Longini, a biostatistician at the University of Florida who is advising the WHO.
“The truth is, we don’t know the efficacy of any of these monkeypox vaccines,” Longini told Science...
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Tuesday scrubbed a recommendation from its website that U.S. travelers wear masks to protect against monkeypox, stating health officials wanted to avoid “confusion” after experts emphasized the disease is not airborne.
The move came just one day after the CDC raised its monkeypox alert to level 2 (the highest is level 3), advising Americans to take precautions while traveling but suggesting Americans don’t need to cancel travel plans.
Infectious disease specialist Monica Gandhi on Monday told “NewsNation Prime” scientists believe prolonged intimate physical contact is required for the disease to spread...
“It’s definitely not airborne, and it takes a lot of contact to get it,” Gandhi said, “which is why we don’t think it’s a major risk to the general population.”
But go get your experimental vaccine, cause you never know, right?
It's free, right?
Here is the stat article (which is not at all interesting) which confirms the lack of deaths. Boy, had there been even a single death, you would have heard about it by now, over and over.
Andrew Rambaut (pronounced Rambo—and like Rambo, he is still in the ring, fighting for the globalists, when he should have taken his toys and slunk away long ago—after being beaten up as one of the stooges who produced the fake Nature Medicine paper on COVID’s origins) has long been associated with a group of virology spooks in Tony Fauci and Jeremy Farrar’s network. The field of evolutionary biology is supposed to tell you where new viruses have come from. But of course, it has been kidnapped to provide specious explanations when the biowarriors need to try and explain their concoctions as having natural origins.
Rambaut was also used to dispute the origins of HIV (as described in my friend Ed Hooper’s book The River) while teamed up with Eddie Holmes, another Fauci flunkie, more than 20 years ago.
Republican members of Congress want to know what Fauci and his henchmen were up to when they concocted a fake natural origin for COVID, as revealed in the Fauci emails:
https://roy.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-roy-demands-answers-fauci-emails
Rambaut was one of the 5 authors of that paper, and the paper was highly effective for a bit over one year at keeping a lid on COVID’s lab origin. As the members of Congress wrote:
Andersen and three other doctors on this teleconference [including Rambaut] later published a paper titled "the proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 in Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020. This paper was highly influential in shaping our nation's response to the pandemic. In the paper, the doctors concluded that "…we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible."[11]
… The Andersen paper led the narrative away from COVID-19's potential lab origins. As Americans, we are deeply concerned by the appearance of discrepancies that largely influenced our understanding and approach to this virus. As Representatives of the American people, we owe it to them to seek and expose the truth about this virus' origins wherever those efforts may lead.
Now Rambaut has popped up again, like a jack-in-the-box, to explain how the unexplainable 50 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP mutations) could have happened naturally. He has another bold theory! There was an evolutionary jump!
And Rambaut proffered yet another theory: the virus has been spreading in humans for years; we just didn’t notice it.
Below is a paper published by Portuguese researchers discusing the newly discovered mutations in money pox. They mention Rambaut’s theory, and Rambaut himself provides the first comment below the paper.
Spooks like Dr. Rambaut don’t do this dirty work for nothing. Just last month, he was made a fellow of the Royal Society.
From Wikipedia:
Science reported on 11 January 2020 that Rambaut was the first to publish the genome of the COVID-19 coronavirus after it was sent to him by Edward C. Holmes.[11][12] Holmes has said that it "took 52 minutes from receiving the code [from his Chinese colleague Professor Yong-Zhen Zhang] to publishing" on Virological.[13][14] The BBC Horizon episode The Vaccine stated: "When Chinese scientists published the genetic sequence of a mystery new virus on January 10th 2020, vaccine scientists around the world immediately sprang into action".[15]
Rambaut was one of the authors of the scientific paper The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2,[16] which concluded that "SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus".
Rambaut is an attendee of the UK's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE).[17]
Perhaps someone else can look up his recent research grants. Were they from NIH or Wellcome? Being rewarded royally with other peoples’ money is another characteristic of the virology spook group.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005769107. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
Anne W Rimoin 1 , Prime M Mulembakani, Sara C Johnston, James O Lloyd Smith, Neville K Kisalu, Timothee L Kinkela, Seth Blumberg, Henri A Thomassen, Brian L Pike, Joseph N Fair, Nathan D Wolfe, Robert L Shongo, Barney S Graham, Pierre Formenty, Emile Okitolonda, Lisa E Hensley, Hermann Meyer, Linda L Wright, Jean-Jacques Muyembe
Who are these authors, who warned us about a potential resurgence of money pox in 2010?
We have Barney Graham, from Fauci's NIAID Vaccine Research Center, and scientists from USAMRIID (Fort Detrick), W.H.O. and Nathan Wolfe's organization, which evolved from a nonprofit to a highly profitable company.
Nathan Wolfe is now best known as an associate of Peter Daszak (Nathan too is a viral profiteer working at the margins of US intelligence), a squire of Ghislaine Maxwell and a bandit whose company Metabiota interfaced between the Ukraine biolabs and Hunter Biden's Seneca company which financed them.
I bought Wolfe's 2011 book (image below), which is subtitled, "The Dawn of a New Pandemic Age," and was surprised to find the picture on the cover was a surgical mask! And the image of him looked very dark. Which made sense, I guess, since he was on the Board of Ghislaine's fake charity, TerraMar. He was also a WEF Young Global Leader. And NIH prize winner.
The take-home message is that these people were setting the stage for today’s pandemic more than ten years ago. The Laurie Garretts, Nathan Wolfes, Peter Daszaks were softening us up, getting us prepared to be scared to death by viruses...while our autonomy, sovereignty and our possessions too are being ripped from us while we are distracted, fearing existential threats that have been blown way out of proportion.
$5 dollar a gallon gasoline? $10? Embargo Russian gas, create an artificial shortage, prices skyrocket and India pays a premium price to Russia for their petroleum, then refines it and sells it to Europe.
Do you think the puppet masters didn't know that an embargo would steal from you, help Russia (the ruble is up) and further enrich everyone who makes money from oil?
The same sly actors are wailing about global warming, demanding more windmills and solar panels, even though they cannot compete with the cost of oil. This drives up the price of energy even more.
These evil actors have created artificial food and fertilizer shortages, as well as an artificial oil shortage. They are squeezing us and playing us. Until we stop them.
https://brownstone.org/articles/a-helplessness-people-weary-and-traumatized/
BY JUNE 4, 2022
When most people hear the terms “shock and awe” and “full spectrum dominance” they probably think—if they think about them at all—of the early moments of the premeditated US destruction of Iraq and the ever-smug grin of Donald Rumsfeld.
It was Rumsfeld, you will recall, who supposedly spent the first months of his mandate as Secretary of Defense totally rethinking the mechanics of the US way of making war.
At the center of the new defense doctrine were the two approaches mentioned above.
The first refers to the practice of hitting the enemy so hard, so quickly, and from so many angles that he will immediately recognize the futility of mounting a defense and rapidly give up the struggle.
The second tactic, which is subsumed by the first, refers, among other things, to the practice of inundating the informational environments of the enemy, the domestic US audience and potential US allies with pro-American narratives that leave absolutely no space or time for formulating skeptical questions or coherent discourses of dissent.
In short, the overarching goal of Rumsfeld’s new defense doctrine was—to use a term near and dear to the hearts of James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen who earned millions from the US Defense department after September 11th for designing the torture programs used at Guantanamo Bay and other US black sites around the world—to induce “learned helplessness” in as many segments of the world population as was technically possible.
The centrality to US domestic and international policy of this idea of creating new propagandistic realities that cause most people to lose their ability, and even their desire, to resist was made crystal clear in a 2004 New York Times article on the inner workings of US government led by George W Bush and directed day-to-day in many ways by Karl Rove. According to the author of the piece, Ron Suskind, a Bush aide, almost universally believed to be Rove himself, declaimed that:
“Guys like me were “in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. “That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued. “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”
If we analyze these words in the broader context of the administration’s embrace of shock and awe and full spectrum dominance in the realm of “defense” policy we might translate them in the following way:
“The days when journalists, or for that matter, any element of the body politic set, or heavily conditioned, the agenda for this government are over. We have achieved, and will assiduously use, the information warfare weapons at our disposal to effectively knock you silly, and render you, your colleagues, and by extension, the vast majority of Americans into a state of learned helplessness. We have decided that working with you and the public you claim to be fighting for is inimical to our own caste’s desires and goals and we thus will inflict as much trauma upon you as we deem necessary to bring you to heel and achieve our ends”.
For many, I think, the idea that governments might have the capacity and the desire to assault their own populations with well-organized and persistent campaigns, information warfare seems rather far-fetched. And for others, I suspect, speaking of the widespread infliction of “trauma” in this context might evoke comparisons to some of the worst forms of whiny and exaggerated campus wokery.
But after all we have seen over the last several decades of world history, is the idea that governments might often be strategically motivated, serial abusers of their own populations really so hard to acknowledge?
We know, for example, that when the US-backed Italian government was faced with the growing possibility of having to share power with that country’s Communist Party in the 70s and 80s, elements of the government greenlighted a number of false flag attacks on the Italian police and the general population, the most notable of these being the Pentano bombing of 1972 and the Bologna train station massacre of 1980.
The aim of the bombings, as was subsequently explained by one of the government-protected authors of the attacks, Vicenzo Vinciguerra, was to generate a social panic that would drive those disaffected with the country’s social and economic reality back into the arms of the increasingly discredited, but US-approved Christian-Democrat party.
It was his witness of these events as an anti-establishment activist that impelled the philosopher Giorgio Agamben to write his influential studies on the architectures of social control used by contemporary Western governments, studies that suggest among many other things, that generating “states of exception” wherein the normal deliberative processes of the society are suspended or gravely curtailed, has become standard operating procedure in many Western “democracies.”
I think few would now dispute that, whatever the origins of the attacks of September 11th, the widespread sense of trauma generated within the US population by the repetitive broadcasting of that day’s horrific images greatly facilitated the government’s drive to radically redefine longstanding notions of civil liberty, and achieved citizen buy-in for its multiple wars of aggression in the Middle East.
All of which bring us to Covid.
Can anyone who has read Laura Doddsworth’s essential A State of Fear, or read the German government’s so-called “Panic Paper” (embedded below) really doubt the conscious and cynical desire by governments, who supposedly serve at the pleasure of the people, to inflict trauma on the general populations of those countries?
Is there any other way to understand US government (and its tightly allied media)’s obsessive focus on providing “case counts” bereft of any contextual information (e.g. their relationship to hospitalizations and deaths) that might allow citizens to rationally calculate the true danger they might have faced with the virus?
Does a German government that is not interested in heightening tensions and leveraging them to achieve greater compliance to official edicts among the population propose in a planning document that its officials a) concentrate only on worst case Covid scenarios, b) explicitly eschew the need to model the economic effects of proposed mitigation strategies c) downplay the fact that the disease kills mostly very old people, d) endeavor to produce “the desired shock effect” and induce guilt in children about possibly being the catalyst in the death of their older relatives?
Yes, people all across the Western world and beyond were purposely traumatized by the very people who never ceased telling them that their only true concern was to “keep them safe”™.
While I am not a psychologist, this much I know. The enormously disorienting and cognitively debilitating effects of trauma are fed, more than anything else, by the maintenance of a fundamentally reactive posture in relation to the world around us. The trauma is greatly diminished when we stop, breathe and, to the best of our ability, fearlessly catalog the injuries we have suffered, ask who authored them, and, if relevant, what made so many of us acquiescent to these assaults upon our dignity and well-being.
People like Karl Rove and his many spiritual clones in Government, Hi-tech, Big Capital and Big Pharma are keenly aware of what I just said, and thus will do all in their power to keep us decentered and highly attentive to the ever-changing and mostly trivial info-bites they constantly send our way.
While for us calm and catharsis are the first steps to regaining our integrity, for them they are kryptonite.
So far, it seems, these large centers of power are winning the struggle. Here in the US, as well as the countries in Europe I have recently visited, most citizens seem to have contented themselves, as the serially abused often do, with the temporary cessation of assaults against their dignity and inherent social rights. Few, it seems, are ready to look into the recent past with any sustained passion or vigor.
I wish I knew what might help some of these people recognize the state of learned helplessness into which they have fallen, and how to spur in them the process of spiritual and civic reconstruction in themselves and others. However, I don’t.
And perhaps it’s hubristic of me to think that I should have this capability in the first place.
When in doubt or seemingly stuck in place, I was once told, the first step is seeking out those whose inner lights seem to be burning most brightly, and offering to walk beside them in hope.
Right now, perhaps that’s the best we can all do.
Mr. Harrington concludes his piece with a translation of the German "Panic Papers", which you can find at the end of his Brownstone piece here.
Research Letter
...We used the TriNetX Analytics Platform to access aggregated and deidentified electronic health records of 90 million patients from 66 health care organizations. TriNetX built-in analytic functions permit patient-level analyses while only reporting population-level data. Patients represented 28% of the US population from 50 states covering diverse geographic, age, race, income, and insurance groups.3 Self-identified race and ethnicity were included owing to their association with SARS-CoV-2 infection risk and outcomes.
The study population contained 3 cohorts of children younger than 5 years with no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection: (1) Omicron cohort, who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection between December 26, 2021, and January 25, 20224; (2) Delta (B.1.617.2) cohort, who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection between September 1, 2021, and November 15, 20214; and (3) Delta2 cohort, who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection between November 16 and November 30, 2021.4 Delta2 cohort was developed to control for later time periods and shorter infection window.
Here are the results:
Omicron variants provide even less reason reason to vaccinate young children than earlier variants.
Furthermore, in the 5-11 age group, according to data from the NY Department of Health, based on an extraordinarily comprehensive dataset of 365,000 vaccinated 5-11 year olds, and about 750,000 unvaccinated children the same age, the vaccine only prevented cases for a few days. By 7 weeks after the second shot, efficacy at preventing infections had fallen to 12%--only 1 in 8 children benefited.
After seven weeks, efficacy dropped into negative territory: vaccinated 5-11 year olds were MORE likely to get COVID than the unvaccinated children.
So, if you vaccinated your children, you got some protective benefit for a few weeks, and then your children developed increasing susceptibility to infection. We don't know how long the increased susceptibility lasts.
Please do not subject your precious small children to the world's largest vaccine experiment--for which vaccine harms exceed benefits for most recipients, especially when they are children.
I. The June FDA meetings
This week the Washington Post copied and pasted from a Pfizer press release to announce yet another scientific miracle(TM) that will completely fail in practice. In the process WaPo also got some quotes from the FDA who have now nailed down the schedule for the 4 meetings in June in which they intend to assemble the final pieces for Pharma’s permanent dominance over the American people.
The new schedule is as follows:
June 7, Novavax
June 14, Moderna in kids 6 to 17 years old
June 15, Moderna in kids 6 months to 5 years AND Pfizer in kids 6 months to 4 years
June 28, “Future Framework” (the plan to skip clinical trials in perpetuity)
There is a lot to parse in the WaPo’s brief article.
Contrary to the breathless headline, they still don’t have any data.
Pfizer and BioNTech said the 80 percent efficacy finding was preliminary and based on 10 cases of Covid-19 in the study population as of the end of April. Once 21 cases have occurred, the companies will conduct a more formal analysis of efficacy... Pfizer and BioNTech said they plan to finish filing data with the FDA this week — and warned that the efficacy number was fluid because results are still arriving.
Let’s recap how we got here:
🚩 The Pfizer clinical trial in kids under 5 failed in December 2021.
🚩 So Pfizer added a third dose and that trial also apparently failed in February (which is why Pfizer was forced to withdraw its application on February 10).
🚩 Now Pfizer is describing a jerry-rigged trial of a third dose in 1,678 kids ages 6 months to four years old. Pfizer did not disclose how the kids were divided between the treatment and control group so it is impossible to run our own calculations on efficacy. Out of that sample, 10 developed Covid — although it is not clear how the 10 were distributed between the treatment and control group. (I suppose some quant on Twitter will figure out how to work backwards from Pfizer’s claims to calculate the numbers in each of these categories but needless to say, this is not the proper way to do science.) Of course Pfizer also failed to describe the contents of the “placebo.”
As always with “publication by press release” the announcement raised more questions than answers:
• “the efficacy finding was preliminary”; just 10 cases; “the companies will conduct a more formal analysis” next month; “the efficacy number was fluid because results are still arriving” — so you’re saying that these numbers are NOT statistically significant and in fact you have no valid “results” at all? Got it.
• How exactly will Pfizer double the number of Covid-19 cases in the clinical trial in the next month given that 74.2% of kids already had natural immunity in February which means that nearly 100% of children likely have natural immunity by now?
• Also, is the FDA seriously considering basing national policy, that impacts 18 million children, by relying on a study with only 10 cases? It appears that the FDA is not even pretending to care about science anymore.
What’s perhaps most troubling about this so-called clinical trial is that Pfizer is NOT looking at health outcomes in the real world (because there are none). Instead, all of their claims are based on antibodies in the blood. That’s strange because the members of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee unanimously acknowledged on April 6 that there are “no correlates of protection” in connection with Covid-19 shots (this means that there are no valid proxy measures, such as antibody counts, that can determine whether someone who has received this shot is immune to the virus or not.)
WaPo dutifully copied Pfizer’s disingenuous description:
While the adult trials recruited tens of thousands of volunteers and waited to see if vaccinated people were better protected, the children’s vaccine trials were primarily designed to measure immune responses using blood tests.
No they were not “primarily designed to measure immune responses using blood tests.” The studies were intentionally undersized to hide harms from the shots in addition to other tricks that they use to skew the results (such as kicking you out of the trial if you call 911 or go to the emergency room). But when one shrinks the sample size, surprise! it becomes impossible to detect actual health benefits from the shots (the signal would have been tiny if at all, but when one uses a sample that small then any positive signal can also disappear into statistical insignificance.)
The only reason Pfizer and the FDA are focused on antibodies in the blood is because the trial produced NO clinically significant health outcomes (so they have to invent imagined future benefits by using a proxy measure that they acknowledge it not valid). In this age group the shot is all risk, zero benefit (because 100% of kids have natural immunity already and because the clinical trial showed no real world health benefit).
II. The bigger picture
Tony Fauci and the NIAID funded the creation of a chimera virus that escaped a bioweapons lab and killed 6.3 million people worldwide.
Public health authorities have blocked access to safe and effective prophylaxis and early treatment throughout the pandemic in order to create the market for Covid-19 vaccines.
Covid-19 shots skipped essential safety steps (e.g. challenge trials in animals) and were rushed to market with no long term data.
In practice the mRNA shots suppress immune function for six weeks after the first shot, provide about two months of protection against coronavirus, then efficacy wanes quickly and becomes negative after six months. The data that pharmaceutical companies submit, and the entire review process at FDA and CDC, is based on months two to four (what Alex Berenson calls, “the happy valley”). Meanwhile, these shots cause more side effects than any vaccine ever invented.
Popular support for the current regime has collapsed. More people have died of Covid under Mr. I Believe the Science(TM) than under Orange Man Bad. Only hypochondriacs in blue states seek out additional doses. Meanwhile Sudden Adult Death Syndrome stalks the true believers. In the past 48 hours alone actor Ray Liotta, Andy Fletcher of Depeche Mode, British drummer Alan White (from the band YES), and comedian Phil Butler were all likely killed by Covid-19 shots. It’s impossible to hide all of the bodies at this point.
The FDA seems to know that their window is closing to implement the Final Solution. So they are rushing to put the finishing touches on their plans to inject this toxic junk into the littlest kids in America. The FDA knows that these shots cannot pass proper regulatory review so they’ve developed a plan to rig the process in favor of Pharma in perpetuity. On June 28, the FDA’s “expert advisory committee” will vote on a “Future Framework” whereby all future (reformulated) Covid-19 shots will automatically be deemed “safe and effective(TM)” without any additional clinical trials, on the theory that they are “biologically similar” to existing Covid-19 shots.
What this means is that by fall, the Covid-19 shots that they will be injecting into Americans of all ages will have a new formula that skipped clinical trials altogether.
Injecting people with genetically modified mRNA that skipped clinical trials is genocide. It’s slower than the Nazi Final Solution. But it’s genocide all the same. Indeed the slower pace of the FDA Final Solution (5% to 15% increase in all cause mortality every year) might be even more lethal in the long run. It’s sinister af that they are intentionally building in plausible deniability (‘the FDA said it was safe’) to help the medical establishment feel virtuous while participating in genocide.
I’ll just conclude by saying: be careful what you wish for FDA. The tide has already turned. The American people know exactly what you are doing. We have the receipts. It will be relatively easy to secure a conviction at Nuremberg 2.0 — we literally have you on video committing crimes against humanity. As a reminder, the courts have determined that “I was just following orders” is not a valid defense.
Lab Invest
So much for the scary death rates. Ignore mortality rates of 1%, 10% and all the other numbers plucked from thin air. From Stat:
Pressed yesterday, a WHO official said she didn’t think the outbreak outside Africa would lead to a pandemic, Reuters reported. "We don't know but we don't think so," Rosamund Lewis said. "At the moment, we are not concerned of a global pandemic." The WHO said that 23 countries have reported 257 confirmed cases and roughly 120 suspected cases — a rapid accumulation in an unprecedented outbreak first detected earlier this month. Monkeypox is considered endemic in roughly 12 countries in West and Central Africa.
Nigeria, population 206 million, has experienced a money pox outbreak since 2017. Nigeria reported the first death this year from money pox yesterday, the Associated Press says.
Update June 4
There are 33 diagnosed money pox cases in France. Almost all are mild. There are no reported deaths outside of Africa. Repeat: no reported deaths outside of Africa. That means we have no idea what the mortality rate is except that it is very very low. We don't even know what it is about this disease that might cause a death. SARS-1 had a 10% mortality and was considered extremely serious. SARS-2 has probably about a 0.25% mortality and we all know of people who died after getting it.
With not a single death outside Africa, how can anyone believe the fairytale that money pox is somewhere on the lethality scale between SARS-1 and SARS-2?
With money pox, it seems you only die if you live in the African jungle. And no one seems to know anything about how it might kill you. If even CDC and WHO have not yet provided an explanation about what is so serious about money pox, well, then, it isn't serious.
So far, the illness seems closest to shingles: with headache and systemic symptoms initially, and then blisters which last 1-3 weeks. The blister fluid contains virus particles, and you can spread the infection until all the blisters have dried up.
There may be more scarring due to money pox (190,000 BPs) than due to shingles (which is also due to a large, double-stranded DNA virus of about 125,000 base pairs).
The NY Times runs a very detailed website, updated daily, with COVID cases, hospitalizations, tests, deaths, vaccinations. It is chock full of charts and graphs. Much of the data is granular down to counties. Some of it relates to the whole world. It's a one-stop shop where you can find data on almost everything COVID-related.
The data come from the CDC.
But 2 companion graphs stopped--just came to a dead stop--on different weeks in March and April. The graphs are there, but when you examine them you see that they have not been updated in nearly 2 months. Yet the page states it was updated May 31, 2022.
What happened?
Here are the title and description of the graphs:
CDC has been consistently reporting that cases and deaths in the unvaccinated were many times higher than in the vaccinated. CDC has claimed that the death rate from COVID was at least ten times higher if you were not vaccinated.Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that people who are unvaccinated are at a much greater risk than those who are fully vaccinated to die from Covid-19. These charts compare age-adjusted average daily case and death rates for vaccinated and unvaccinated people inthe states and cities that provide this data
But then the two lines representing the vaccinated and the unvaccinated started closing in on each other on the CDC/NYT graphs. Rates of COVID cases and deaths in the vaccinated seemed to be about the same as in the unvaccinated by late March 2022.
Data from England showed that death rates by then had trended higher in the vaccinated.
Were COVID cases and deaths now higher in the US vaccinated, too?
CDC and the NY Times did something highly unusual. While everything else on this website is up to date, they simply cut off the 2 graphs below (comparing the vaxxed with the unvaxxed), on different weeks in March and April. The graphs remain, but the first graph (Daily COVID cases per 100,000) ended the third week of April. The second graph (Daily COVID deaths per 100,000) stopped abruptly the final week of March.
