Thursday, October 21, 2021

I and many others suggested in the first half of 2020 that it was likely SARS-CoV-2 was created as a chimera of bat viruses and passaged in humanized mice. Seems like we were right


The unusual timing of a bat coronavirus grant report suggests that an earlier version may have been revised.

The annual report described the group’s work from June 2017 to May 2018, which involved creating new viruses using different parts of existing bat coronaviruses and inserting them into humanized mice in a lab in Wuhan, China. The work was overseen by the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is headed by Anthony Fauci.

Neither the NIH nor the EcoHealth Alliance offered an explanation for the date of the report or responded to questions from The Intercept about whether another version of the report had been submitted on time and, if so, in what ways that version may have been altered.

The Intercept is seeking any missing progress reports, among other documents, through ongoing litigation against the NIH.

The agency has been criticized for withholding information that might relate to the origins of the coronavirus pandemic, which is now responsible for more than 4.5 million deaths around the world... 


Anonymous said...

NIH Admits Funding Gain-Of-Function COVID Experiments; Gives EcoHealth Five Days To Report Data.

Dr. Fauci, and Dr. Collins lied again!

A top NIH official admitted in a Wednesday letter that the US-funded so-called "gain-of-function" research in Wuhan, China - and that the US nonprofit which conducted it, EcoHealth Alliance - led by the controversial Peter Daszak, "failed to report" that they had created a chimeric bat coronavirus which could infect humans.

Anonymous said...

Why Graphene Oxide Attacks the Heart

Graphene oxide, already found in the vaccines, generates electricity. From a scientific paper it is known that the amount of electricity graphene produces can be controlled by external energy stimulation, such as light. ‘Graphene oxide has an affinity for the electrical currents of the heart, and acts on external electromagnetic fields remotely’ (Sevillano). Thus cardiac cells, with graphene in them, can be altered or stimulated remotely through pulsed electromagnetic fields from outside the person.

Sevillano uses a house metaphor to explain the 3 parts of the heart: walls/masonry/structure; electrical wiring; plumbing. Readers with medical knowledge will appreciate his explanation.

‘The walls are damaged because graphene looks for everything that has bio-electric activity’. All cells in the body have this bio-electric activity, but the heart cells are constantly depolarizing and polarizing. So the heart is subject to a heightened level of activity. Graphene oxide blindly looks for that level of activity and stays there once it finds it. It invades the heart and is found everywhere inside. It stays inside the walls. It gets in through the arteries and damages them, too. The damage is done on 3 levels:

Sudden deaths caused by ‘conduction tissue‘

Muscle tissue is compromised; it spontaneously generates a current. (Sevillano gives a technical explanation here regarding the types of electrical current given off within the heart.) Myocarditis is damage to the heart muscle. Graphene enters each cell and begins to damage the muscle fibres immediately. Some cells die; others become inflamed.

Coronary arteries, which are generally compromised in older people with a thicker density and an inclination to thrombogenicity in the blood. This gets enhanced immediately by the graphene.

Anonymous said...

"Thinking' and Pres. Bribem is Mandating these Vaccines?

Doctor Hoffe says mRNA vaccines “will kill most people” through heart failure.

Chinese Virus mRNA shots are programmed to turn a person’s body into a spike protein “factory,” and Dr. Hoffe says that over time these mass-produced spike proteins cause progressive blood clotting.
No fewer than 70 percent of people who take an mRNA injection will suffer from these blood clots – and in the end, an overwhelming majority will end up six feet under due to the damage caused.

Though the claim has long been that these spike proteins act as a deterrent to viral infection after being injected into a person’s body, the reality is that they actually become part of the cell wall of a person’s vascular endothelium.
Dr. Hoffe says it is an inevitability that the injected will develop blood clots because as the vaccine-inserted spike proteins embed themselves within blood vessels and capillaries, blood platelets circulate around trying to fix the problem by creating increasingly more clots.

“So, when the platelet comes through the capillary it suddenly hits all these COVID spikes and it becomes absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form to block that vessel,” he writes.
“Therefore, these spike proteins can predictably cause blood clots. They are in your blood vessels (if mRNA ‘vaccinated’) so it is guaranteed.”

It turns out that these blood clots are different than the “rare” ones spoken about on the media that show up on CT scans and MRIs. These are microscopic and do not show up on tests, as they can only be detected using a blood test known as D-dimer.

Most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot [regenerate],” he says. “When those tissues are damaged by blood clots, they are permanently damaged.”

Anonymous said...

What kind of “Law” is being upheld in the United States of Amerika? Yes Komrade, Amerika with a K. Mandated jabs for teachers using shots that are still under an emergency use authorization? The Comirality jab that is allegedly “approved” is not available to anyone and may never be. Where is the Constitution / Bill of Rights? Where is the Nuremberg Code? Where are the natural God given rights that all of humanity are born with? What exactly is the reference being used that an employer can mandate jabs against the will of an employee? What precedents are being used? Has Law been completely abandoned if it goes against the narrative?

This is madness! This is another step, in lockstep with total destruction of personal sovereignty and liberty. Common sense, statistics, medical evidence of harm and jab injury do not seem to even be addressed in any of these cases.

What will come next? Will the so called government next decide and decree that the entire population is required to be jabbed or be imprisoned? Is that what it will take to finally stir people to political and legal action?

It’s just like that old saying: First they came for the medical personnel, but it did not effect me, so I said and did nothing. Then they came for the teachers, but I was not a teacher so I said and did nothing. Then they came for the Police, Paramedics, Fire Fighters and Military but that still did not effect me, so I said and did nothing. Then they came for all the government employees and any other employees that were employed by a company that had 100 or more employees, but that did not effect me so I said and did nothing. Then they came for EVERYONE and there was not enough left to effectively say or do anything.

Anonymous said...

Study by Harvard Researcher Finds Countries with Lowest COVID-19 Vaccination Rates Have Fewer Cases of COVID than Fully Vaccinated Countries.

Anonymous said...

Biden vaccine mandate isn't in effect, isn't enforceable, Republican AGs argue.

States vow immediate legal challenge to block implementation, once regulatory rule is officially announced.

Paul Zarembka said...

Thanks for the link to the Harvard study. I understand it to say that transmission rates are rather equal across U.S. countries (I prefer the U.S. data to the international ones where reporting differs so much). This result, however, does not address whether medical consequences differ, across the unvaccinated and the three vaccines. Some say vaccines help, others say they hurt. Such a follow-up would be useful.

Anonymous said...

'Fortunately, a few frontier research groups have recently opened the possibility of utilizing a graphene-based RFID system for wireless biomedical application'

Graphene Nanomaterials-Based Radio-Frequency/Microwave Biosensors for Biomaterials Detection.

Now it makes sense to me. They're not trying to kill people... They're trying to tag us so they can control us.

Anonymous said...

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 outlaw’s discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Specifically, Sections 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3) (“Title VII”), and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a.

The Free Exercise Clause protects not only the right to believe or the right to worship; it protects the right to perform or abstain from certain physical acts in accordance with one’s belief. Federal statutes, including the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (“RFRA”), support that protection, broadly defining the exercise of religion to encompass all aspects of observance and practice whether central to, or required by, a religious faith.

Anonymous said...

What’s this mean? Several things, all bad. We know the vaccines do not stop infection or transmission of the virus (in fact, the report shows elsewhere that 'vaccinated adults are now being infected at much HIGHER rates than the unvaccinated').

What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.

This means vaccinated people will be far more vulnerable to mutations in the spike protein EVEN AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN INFECTED AND RECOVERED ONCE (or more than once, probably).

It also means the virus is likely to select for mutations that go in exactly that direction, because those will essentially give it an enormous vulnerable population to infect. And it probably is still more evidence the vaccines may interfere with the development of robust long-term immunity post-infection.