Wednesday, May 25, 2022

School shootings. I am sorry but this needs to be said.

1.  Normal people have no interest in killing children, especailly ones they do not know, especially in large numbers.

2.  In my view, only people subject to mind control (please investigate Sirhan Sirhan or read about US intelligence agency attempts to create mind controlled assassins beginning in the 1950s) or people taking certain drugs, or special trained assassins are even capable of carrying out such an act.  [In the case of Sirhan Sirhan, who did fire wildly on a crowd, but did not kill Kennedy, the actual assassin was an intelligence asset.  From the WaPo in 2018:

Though Sirhan admitted at his trial in 1969 that he shot Kennedy, he claimed from the start that he had no memory of doing so. And midway through Sirhan’s trial, prosecutors provided his lawyers with an autopsy report that launched five decades of controversy: Kennedy was shot at point-blank range from behind, including a fatal shot behind his ear. But Sirhan, a 24-year-old Palestinian immigrant, was standing in front of him.

3.  School shootings are the most provocative and effective way to initiate a change in gun laws, which means taking away the guns from some or all of the people who privately own them.

4.  The large number of American gun owners pose a daunting challenge to the globalists who wish to control them.  Police and military will not be willing to enter the homes of gun owners to remove their guns or for other purposes.

5.  Few Europeans, Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders own guns, and it is believed by many that the imposition of much harsher lockdowns on the citizens of these nations, compared to the US, was enabled by this fact.

6.  There have been shortages of guns and ammunition in the US since the onset of the pandemic.  Whether this is due to supply-demand, including increased purchases by the federal government, or to other market forces, is not clear. 

7.  There has been very little exploration into the past history of those who committed mass murders in the US in recent years, especially in schools.  I want to know if any or all of these mass murderers may have been enrolled in black mind control projects.

8.  I want a full accounting of the mind control programs paid for with taxpayer dollars in the US and elsewhere.

9.  I want an investigation into the many thousands of self-reported "targeted individuals" (TIs) who complain of voices beamed into their heads and other forms of what can only be termed torture.

10.  I want an investigation into the implants some of these people claim were introduced into their bodies.

11.  A reader sent me this piece by David Swanson, revealing that at least a third of mass US shooters have been trained in the US military.  Were they put through mind control programs while serving their country?

12.  Why have so many assassins and mass shooters appeared to be in an altered state of consciousness immediately after the event, and/or at other times?  Think Sirhan Sirhan, Mark David Chapman, Reagan's attempted assassin whose father was having dinner with GHW Bush the week of the attempt?  Has anyone analyzed their behaviors systematically? Their histories and connections to the powerful?

13.  We are being attacked in many perverse ways, and we must open our eyes, take our power back, or the attacks will continue and will destroy us.


Anonymous said...

It's Big Pharma, as usual.

WaffleStaffel said...

It's important to note that mass shootings were being *reported* fast and furious and accelerating rate during the Obama years, then died down to almost nothing during the Trump admin, and are now starting to pick up again. I mention this not because I believe it actually has anything to do with the political climate.
While I do believe there's plenty of evidence of mind control and electronic harassment and gang stalking programs, it is actually much easier for TPTB to fake a mass casualty than to perpetrate or instigate one.
If one goes back to the Port Arthur shooting, which was used as the pretext to totally disarm Australians, on the surface you might conclude a hidden hand/special forces involvement, what with Martin Bryant's diminished intellectual capacity and his remarkable supposed shot-to-kill ratio. Digging further, though, reveals not just a blatant mischaracterization of Bryant's abilities and tendencies, but the fact that, far from being an easily manipulated, low-IQ individual, he was actually well educated and from a well-connected elite family. In much the same way, Adam Lanza and James Holmes are not just random, troubled youths, but have very interesting family connections.
There is no better evidence of this than Sandy Hook. If you're unfamiliar with the details, it's best to start with Robbie Parker's press conference, and the condition of the school at the time (which had weeds proliferating the parking lot and had no Christmas decorations)
Miles Mathis covers these events and others very thoroughly, not in a hyperbolic or sensational way, but in a way that makes you wonder how you missed so many obviousl clues in the first place.
People often try to argue that such a large conspiracy could not be kept silent with so many people involved. First of all, people out the details of these conspiracies all the time, but because they are ignored by the media and dismissed by everyone else doesn't negate their existence. Staging an event from whole cloth reduces that number by avoiding victims families altogether. People are particularly willing to lie when it reaffirms their own political dogma- "I'm doing this because gun control is important, and no one is actually getting hurt anyway", and large sums of money can soothe the conscience.
Delving deep into these events is highly recommended and educational.

WaffleStaffel said...

-and the "big pharma" angle is already heavily pushed by the MSM, and much of the "alternative" media, so I think it's safe to discount. All it serves to do is reinforce the idea that these events are real, and that people with alternative political beliefs- anti-vax/anti-gun control/anti-illegal immigration -are potentially dangerous and violent lunatics, and that we should always live in fear of each other rather than come together as a community.

Anonymous said...

dr. Nass,
Do you remember all the hype years ago about the Course in Miracles? Oprah, Maryanne Williamson, and others? There is a big question about the involvement of Project Bluebird, which later became the CIA's MK-Ultra, in the mental/mind manipulation of Dr. Helen Schucman who is supposed to have been the source of The Course In Miracles.

Here is a quote from the beginning of the article. The link to the entire article is below.
"A Course in Miracles has an interesting history and it all started when Dr. Helen Schucman, a non-religious Jew began working with Dr. William Thetford in 1958.

It seems Dr. Thetford had ties with the CIA and was working on Project Bluebird, which was later rolled over into the MK-Ultra Project. MK-Ultra was a program focused on mind control created in the 1950s by the CIA with the goal to learn ways to manipulate people’s mental states, alter brain function and create Manchurian Candidates often through the use of drugs and hypnosis."

Here is the link reference as a start for looking into exactly the questions you are raising in your blog post. All this goes back decades ... just like the plandemic.

Best wishes for your recovery. Falls can happen so fast.........

Anonymous said...

ALEX BERENSON: 'Did Cannabis Psychosis Cause The Mass Shootings In Texas And Elsewhere?'

'Cannabis causes psychosis. Psychosis causes violence.'

Yep, there it is, the first reference to cannabis use by Salvador Ramos, the Texas elementary school killer. In the New York Times.

Took 24 hours, give or take.

And Ms. Rodriguez recalled he would often talk about how much he despised his mother and grandmother, whom he told her 'did not let him smoke weed or do what he wanted'.

This is only one case. Except it’s not.

Nikolas Cruz, the Florida high school shooter, was a heavy user and told the police detective who interviewed him that he heard voices. Devin Patrick Kelley - who shot up a Texas church and killed 26 people in 2017 before blowing his head off - had THC in his system when he died. (Kelley had anti-anxiety drugs too; a lot of heavy cannabis users wind up using Xanax or Klonopin to try to tamp down their paranoia.) Darrell Brooks Jr., last seen allegedly racing through the Waukesha Christmas Parade, is a self-described stoner.


OldLeonB said...

Thank you for saying this, Dr. Nass. A horrifying prong of the multipronged globalist agenda. Knock some people off here, knock some other poor souls off over there... but never so many killings that more than a few people will snap out of it and question the true motives of their own governments.

WaffleStaffel said...

Jesus, "Cannabis Psychosis"? Good old Alex.
"5/22 Republicans to Kill Domestic Terrorism Bill 5/24 Mass Casualty Event in Texas"
"Robb Shooting: Suspect Bullied for Being Poor Bought $3,000 Military Grade AR-15?"
To sum it up, despite all the surveillance footage we'd expect to be available, we have 1 blurry video from someone perched on a roof nearby, for some reason, as though they're expecting something to happen. A domestic terrorism bill was about to be tanked, then poof, a mass shooting and a presidential assassination scheme. The boy, (who, as usual, was by all accounts the last person anyone would suspect) was so poor he was alleged to have been teased for his raggedy clothes, somehow finds $3k for just one of his *military grade* weapons. There are fake photos of him supposedly cross dressing. There's a horrendous wreck involving his truck at some point (again, a surprisingly nice truck for a poor teenager with a part-time job at Wendy's).
An armed border patrol tactical agent makes it to the scene and "neutralizes" the suspect before any police officers arrive.
The suspect, as par for the course, has absolutely no motive. But maybe it was big pharma and their antidepressants. Or maybe it was Cannabis Psychosis. Whatever explanation we can come up with to affirm this event was indeed real and happened the way we are told. Let's not think about the probability this boy was goaded into this by deep-state groomers, or that he was a patsy who was kept on ice while special forces-types carried out the actual shooting, or that none of this actually happened, and it's all the product of script writers and actors, or what agenda this type of thing drives.

WaffleStaffel said...

"When you say SSRIs caused it or societal pressures made him do it 1. you are agreeing he actually did it (when evidence may or may not support that) and 2. you are just BEGGING for Bloomberg's mental hygiene laws"

Anonymous said...

Brenda Spencer said she didn’t like Monday’s. She didn’t mention mind control.