Sunday, April 3, 2022

UK data: vaccine prevents deaths for a few short months, and then it doesn't/ ONS

The following graphs straight from the UK Office of National Statistics seem self-explanatory to me.  Perhaps if you keep on getting boosters you may not die as readily.  But those earlier shots are sure wearing off quickly, and after a few months have passed, they do not, as claimed by the CDC, prevent deaths.

It turned out that people who get flu shots are a much healthier cohort than those who do not.  So we must be careful comparing the vaxed and unvaxed.

In any event, I showed earlier today in the NY and CA data that the vax does not prevent hospitalizations.  Here I show using UK data that deaths are not prevented either.

So what does this vaccine do?  And why do so many newly totalitarian nations demand obeisance to the vaccine?

UPDATE:  Note that the graphs below disappeared from this blog after a week, around the time the UK announced it would no longer publish these figures.  Luckily I had a pdf of the graphs.

Figure 1: Monthly age-standardised mortality rates (ASMRs) for deaths involving COVID-19 are consistently lower for people who had a third dose or booster at least 21 days ago than unvaccinated people

ASMRs calculated for each month, by vaccine status, total and by age group, for deaths involving COVID-19, England, deaths occurring between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022


Anonymous said...

"Dr. David Haskell: 'Vaccine Mandates are the Rehearsal', the Future will be Worse"!

Anonymous said...

It's a very alienating time. At a dinner last week everyone at my table was planning on the fourth shot, and looked forward to an annual mRNA update along with the flu vaccine.

I was the only one without mRNA.

Their vaccine-bliss was almost trance-like. They were so grateful for the shots and it gave them strength and certainty that they were protected from severe symptoms.

In their trance, they repeatedly reassured each other that this was the right thing to do. I've been around enough doctors to spot how they present a medication to patients and talk it up, trying to establish confidence and a subsequent "placebo effect". They had adopted the same speaking tone and manipulation techniques and used them on each other.

These people see no limits, and it doesn't seem possible to get through to them. California is considering fixing the homeless problem with forced monthly injections of anti-psychotics. Will they stop at just the homeless? What else is on the table, other than Covid mRNA and anti-psychotics?

The people at my table saw no limiting principle at all.

Unknown said...

The vaccine story is worse when comprehending the 14 day window in which shots/boosters count towards the previous level of treatment. It's a terribly flawed analysis, probably intentionally, which will always demonstrate a statistical bias. If you get jabbed, for a period of time you are immuno compromised. People in this window of time are not considered "vaccinated". This little data manipulation is the only reason vaccines showed efficacy to begin with. Imagine all the people who at the height of pandemic infections, got vaccinated and were thus immunocompromised ie much more susceptable to a serious outcome. How many serious hospitalizations and deaths did this cause? Will we ever know?

JDKelley said...

Is it just me, or are the only people who are worried about CATCHING COVID the people who are VACCINATED against COVID? Riddle me that...