Saturday, February 12, 2022

Children's Health Defense Informed the FDA that the Facts Certainly Fail to Support Vaccinations in the 6 month-60 month age group. Here is our letter



February 9, 2022





Dear Dr. Janet Woodcock:


We write to you on behalf of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), a non-profit organization devoted to the health of people and the planet. We have actively followed your work to evaluate, authorize and approve vaccines for the American public, and particularly children. 


We are aware that you are likely to grant Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of Pfizer’s BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for children aged six months up to five years old following your upcoming meeting on February 15, 2022. We are writing to put you on notice that should you recommend this pediatric EUA vaccine to children under five years old, CHD is poised to take legal action against you. CHD will seek to hold you accountable for recklessly endangering this population with a product that has little, no, or even negative net efficacy but which may put them, without warning, at risk of many adverse health consequences, including heart damage, stroke and other thrombotic events and reproductive harms.


We briefly outline why such a recommendation would be reckless for nearly 20 million children in the United States, and millions more around the world.


  1. There is no COVID emergency for children under five years old. Children have a 99.995% recovery rate and a body of medical literature indicates that almost zero healthy children under five years old have died from COVID. 


  • A large study conducted in Germany showed zero deaths for children under 5 and a case fatality rate of three out of a million in children without comorbidities. 

  • A Johns Hopkins study monitoring 48,000 children diagnosed with COVID showed a zero mortality rate in children under 18 without comorbidities., 

  • A study in Nature demonstrated that children under 18 with no comorbidities have virtually no risk of death.

  • Data from England and Wales, published by the UK Office of National Statistics on January 17, 2022 revealed that throughout 2020 and 2021, only one (1) child under the age of 5, without comorbidities, had died from COVID in the two countries, whose total population is 60 million.

  • Another study in Nature from April, suggests children’s bodies clear the virus more easily than adults. 

  • This study published in December in Nature demonstrated how children efficiently mount effective, robust and sustained immune responses.

  1. Over one third of all children are estimated to have natural immunity to COVID, according to CDC’s own data. There is no ethical justification for superfluous vaccination that will put children at elevated risk of vaccine harm. 

  1. The risks demonstrably outweigh the benefits of COVID vaccination in young children. A study out of Hong Kong, showed one out of every 2,700 12-17 year old boys being diagnosed with myocarditis following the 2nd dose of Comirnaty vaccine, or 37 per 100,000 vaccinated. A study from Kaiser found the same rate of myocarditis in 12-17 year old American boys, 1/2700. 

  1. While the CDC is saying that myocarditis is a mild disease, cardiologists know otherwise. CDC’s own preliminary data, reported at the February 4 ACIP meeting, revealed that nearly half of the young people diagnosed with myocarditis still had symptoms 3 months later, and 39% had their activity restricted by their physician. We know this serious adverse event occurs frequently in teenagers. But no one knows how often it occurs in younger children. This is of major concern for babies and younger children.

5.   The clinical trials for children 2 through 4 years old failed., You’re proposing to use a product and schedule that failed in its clinical trials, and you may potentially add a third dose later in the spring. This is an unprecedented proposal not backed by science. It does not meet the risk-benefit standard of 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 the known and potential benefits of the product, when used to diagnose, prevent, or treat such disease or condition, outweigh the known and potential risks of the product.”

6.   Some children likely will die and others will be permanently injured from these vaccines based on reporting to the current VAERS database. The latest data shows a total of 1,088,560 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 23,149 deaths and 183,311 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Jan. 28, 2022.


7.   The pediatric clinical trials for the COVID vaccines were too small to detect safety signals–especially for a population in the tens of millions.


8.   There are a) no long-term safety data for COVID vaccination of young children, and b) the proposal is to vaccinate children under the Emergency Use Authorization. Both a) and b) establish that vaccinating small children for COVID will be an experiment, not a standard medical procedure. 


9.   Unethical coercive pressure will be applied to children and their parents, as has occurred with older children and adults. To grant authorization is to abet this unethical coercion that violates the Nuremberg Code’s first principle. 


10. There is no available care for children injured by COVID shots. There is no way to remove the spike protein and other toxic byproducts of vaccination, which may be produced for a considerable period of time following inoculation of messenger RNA. The science and medicine have not yet developed, and most families will be unable to cover the costs of potential catastrophic injuries.


11. First, do no harm. You are a physician who owes a duty to patients and medical ethics. If you recommend these shots to this age group, given all you know, will you be upholding your oath? If not, is it possible that your acts could later be seen as reason to remove your medical licenses?


12. The liability-free nature of your deliberations may not stand the test of time. In the fullness of time, your decisions may not have the liability protection that they currently enjoy. Under the PREP Act of 2005, all actors advancing an EUA agenda for medical countermeasures enjoy liability protection, absent willful misconduct., Nonetheless, if at a later point these shots are deemed non-therapeutic gene products that you knowingly and recklessly recommended, and which were then distributed to children as a direct result of your decision, it is possible that liability could later attach.


13. There are safer drugs that could be used prophylactically and therapeutically for COVID in children. There is extensive and compelling medical evidence for this assertion; and the choice to eschew use of these drugs in favor of a demonstrably dangerous vaccine is arbitrary and capricious.


14. The vaccines do not prevent transmission. They do not prevent infection. There is no statistically valid evidence that they prevent severe disease or deaths in children. Which begs the question: what are you actually trying to accomplish by vaccinating small children? What is your goal?


15. On August 23, 2021, FDA’s letter to BioNTech explained that neither the VAERS nor the VSD surveillance systems were adequate for FDA to determine the risk of myocarditis resulting from the Pfizer vaccine. Therefore, Pfizer and BioNTech were instructed by FDA to carry out a series of studies of myocarditis to ascertain the risk in different groups, including children. These studies were scheduled to produce final reports to FDA over the next five years.  If  the FDA is willing to wait until 2027 to learn the actual risks of myocarditis from the vaccine for children, shouldn’t it be required to wait until 2027 before inoculating millions of small children with a vaccine anticipated to provide them no benefit and possibly substantial risks?


16. An important Cell article in press, written by scientists from Stanford, has shown that, based on lymph node sampling after mRNA vaccination, spike protein and its mRNA remain present in the germinal centers of draining lymph nodes for up to 60 days, which is when sampling ceased. This was not supposed to happen.  The demonstration of vastly prolonged spike protein production has revealed that the dose of spike protein produced in vivo by mRNA vaccines is unpredictable.  FDA, however, requires uniformity of dosing. This fact alone should disqualify all authorizations and approvals of mRNA COVID vaccines.


We ask that you carefully consider all the information above before making any recommendation for Pfizer's vaccine in the 6 months to under 5 year age group at your meeting on February 15, 2022.


__________________ ___________________

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.             Meryl Nass, M.D.

Unfortunately, the footnotes are missing from this version. They can be found at:


Anonymous said...

Does everyone know about the red letter campaign? It was a job and cost a bit but I sent letters and a color flyer to everyone on the website with a complete address on Friday.

Anonymous said...



Months of work have been validated.
Over the past year we have lined up labs and spent months trying to get a sample vial of the vaccine - but failed.
Meanwhile, someone in the UK has just succeeded!

The results are in.

'Graphene is confirmed!'

A UK lab has analysed a sample using RAMAN Spectroscopy and found Graphene.

(RAMAN Spectroscopy is the same technique used by Dr Campra in Spain to confirm GO in Spanish samples)

The sample was obtained by a UK doctor who kept the vital chain of evidence intact meaning the analysis will stand up in the UK courts.

The case briefing can be downloaded below.

Anonymous said...

'Vaccine Injunction'

We are calling for an injunction to pause to the vaccine rollout to due to multiple questions we have.

1. - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations?

2. - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination?

3. - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public

4. - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated?

5. - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing.

Anonymous said...


Bump and Share!
Tricia Lindsay gives a very powerful speech to the public about how the US government and governments around the world are violating human rights by imposing mandates and discriminate against the unvaccinated.

Anonymous said...



Kindergarten Young Hearts Versions Premiere Next?

UPDATED How Many People Are the Vaccines Killing? | Dr Vernon Coleman
Myocarditis Cover-up Exposed excerpts

Dr Vernon Coleman GP MB ChB DSc

Back in December 2020 I warned that the mRNA covid jabs could cause a huge number of serious adverse events – including myocarditis, heart attacks and strokes.

The warning, the first in the world I believe, was largely ignored. Doctors sneered and ignored it and fact checkers denied it – even though the warning was based on evidence from the American Government.

And then a few months ago I revealed evidence proving the link between the covid jabs and myocarditis.

Now at last the mainstream media can no longer ignore what is happening.

Sports professionals, as fit as you can get, have been dropping down with heart trouble. There are so many heart problems among school children that there is a call to put defibrillators in all schools.

But the mainstream media is not, as you might expect, warning that the covid jabs are causing myocarditis and heart attacks.

The Evening Standard in London says that up to 300,000 people are facing heart related illnesses due to something called Post Pandemic Stress Disorder. It’s even got an acronym PPSD so you know it’s real.

Tahir Hussain, a surgeon, is quoted as saying he has recently seen a big increase in thrombotic related vascular conditions.

I bet he has.

Thrombotic related vascular conditions are a known problem with the covid jabs.

ABC7 in Los Angeles reports that doctors have warned that Super Bowl games may trigger heart attacks – though doesn’t explain the heart attacks which happen between Super Bowl games and to be honest with you I’m doubtful that all those people collapsing with myocarditis are sick because of a Super Bowl game disappointment. But you have to give them points for trying.

The Mayo Clinic in the US says that stress and chaos can cause heart disease. Well, wow. I first pointed that out in 1978 in a book called Stress Control. I was widely vilified for saying that. But now it seems stress is running amok.

And there is word that vitamin D shortages can cause problems. Interestingly, I made a video about that very early on. YouTube took it down of course, presumably because it might have saved lives.

Scientific American says that covid-19 can lead to heart damage among people with no symptoms at all. Nothing. Secretly. And the big problem is myocarditis. Gosh.

We mustn’t call Long Covid malingering of course. Even if it largely is.

Governments don’t care. It’s all part of the Great Reset plan to destroy the global economy. The bottom line is that alleged Long Covid sufferers are helping the conspirators.

The amazing thing is that despite all these sometimes bizarre theories, as far as I know not one major newspaper, TV station or radio station anywhere in the world has admitted that all these heart troubles, strokes and other illnesses are caused by the damned jabs.

Anonymous said...

I wonder what all the Mayors/Governors, Biden, USA that Mandated the alleged Vaccines may have to say about this? Presence of several forms of 'Graphene Oxide' and derivatives in Pfizer, Moderna and Astra Zeneca Covid jabs 'confirmed by UK lab.'

A request for criminal investigation submitted to the Police by a civil organization in the UK, organization that is compounded by Medical Doctors, Health Care practitioners, a legal team and an independent media channel (Not on the Beeb) includes an independent laboratory report, which contains a full chain of chastity for the analyzed vials, and concludes that the vials contain: (less than 50%)

The analysis of all four vial contents identified objects that are similar. For ease of nomenclature and related descriptions per vaccine, these inclusions are illustrated and defined individually below-
The identified inclusions were-

Graphene nano ribbons coated with Polyethylene Glycol
Graphene Composite Form 1
Graphene Composite Form 2
Microcrystalline Calcite with Carbonaceous inclusions
Graphene Nano Forms with and without fluorescence
Graphene nano objects
Graphene nano scrolls

So, all the naysayers?, 'we have conclusive proof that redeems all who have been criticized by even suggesting the possibility'. What are the pro vaxxers going to claim now? 'That 'Graphene' is good for one's health'?

Link to Not on the Beeb channel article, which contains both the briefing presented to the 'UK police and the Independent Laboratory Analysis'.

Anonymous said...

Blood Slides Vaccine. Graphene Oxide? Graphene Hydroxide?
For so many months I had pondered how this infection could be so severe, that the vaccine has to be given to every human on the planet several times—even if one has recovered from Covid. This is unprecedented in vaccine history.

Why aren’t more people looking at the vaccine under a microscope? Why hasn’t the public been informed of the full ingredients of the only FDA approved vaccine for Covid?

The pictures speak for themselves. I am making no claims as to what we are looking at. I have noticed on line that some people who read the original publications, have made claims on my behalf.

All I have done is look at different aspects of the vaccine and the blood under microscopy.

This research should be continued by other laboratories with high powered microscopes.

Anonymous said...

'Graphene' Oxide!

“Several typical mechanisms underlying graphene (oxide) nanomaterial's toxicity have been revealed, for instance, physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. In these mechanisms, toll-like receptors (TLR), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) dependent-pathways are involved in the signalling pathway network, and oxidative stress plays a crucial role in these pathways.

Many experiments have shown that graphene (oxide) nanomaterials have toxic side effects in many biological applications, but more in-depth study of toxicity mechanisms is needed.[80] According to the USA FDA, graphene, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide elicit toxic effects both in vitro and in vivo”

Graphene oxide/hydroxide forms the lattice/foundation for hydrogel.

Those never before seen foot long clots that the embalmers are now pulling out of the veins of dead vaxxed people are off-white/translucent and rubbery due to the self assembling-expanding hydrogel that the jabs initiate in those who's immune system can't nip the process in the bud.

Some of the "hot shots" probably contain so much of the stuff that even people with strong immune systems will succumb.

There could be other factors at play, such as activation/suppression of genes and bodily processes using certain frequencies that interact with the microprocessing units formed by some of the jabs.

Diabolical. Truth is stranger than fiction.



Pogo said...

Would have liked to have seen these two papers added to the footnotes. Although neither come out and declare that these vaccines are killing and harming more people than the SARS Cov-2 would have done in a normal pandemic, the inference is clear. Deaths rise up and slowly decline with each vaccine roll out in all countries studied. The authorities explanations of their own figures lack credibility.
And before anyone mutters ‘correlation is not proof of causation.’ The totality of data we now have, including that by insurance companies, looks to me as meeting the Bradford Hill Criteria for Causation. I’d like to see in writing Dr. Janet Woodcock efforts at trying to deny this.

Neil, Martin. Fenton, Norman. et. al., (2022/01/12); Latest statistics on England mortality data suggest systematic mis-categorisation of vaccine status and uncertain effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccination. Queen Mary London University. United Kingdom.
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28055.09124

Beattie, Kyle A. (2021/11/15) Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries. Department of Political Science University of Alberta Alberta, Canada
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34214.65605

lynnbrad said...

bravo and many thanks!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

1.) Follow the Money to Discover who is behind the ‘Pandemic’ and also Restructuring Global Money.

2.) Dr. David Martin: Who “They” Are, “The Names and Faces”!

Anonymous said...


'State AG rules doctors 'can prescribe' ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine'.

Anonymous said...

'U.S. Trucker Convoy announces accelerated launch date of Feb 23 from Barstow…CA.'

#6: MIN MARK: SADDLE UP? Heading East?

Pogo said...

Cut & pasted this:

Attorney General O'Connor Assures Oklahoma Physicians Are Not Prohibited From Prescribing Off-Label Medicines to Fight COVID-19
OKLAHOMA CITY -Today, Attorney General John O’Connor responded to inquiries about whether an Oklahoma licensed physician is prohibited from prescribing a drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the “off-label” purpose of treating or preventing COVID-19.

The Attorney General’s office finds no legal basis for a state medical licensure board to discipline a licensed physician for exercising sound judgement and safely prescribing an FDA-approved drug – like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine – for the off-label purpose of treating a patient with COVID-19.

“I stand behind doctors who believe it is in their patients’ best interests to receive ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine,” said Attorney General O’Connor. “Our healthcare professionals should have every tool available to combat COVID-19. Public safety demands this. Physicians who prescribe medications and follow the law should not fear disciplinary action for prescribing such drugs.”

The Attorney General’s office neither condones nor condemns a specific course of treatment for COVID-19. Our office maintains that proper healthcare decisions are to be made between a patient and his or her physician, and the government should not interfere with their relationship.