Saturday, June 27, 2020

How a false hydroxychloroquine narrative was created, and more


It is remarkable that a large series of events taking place over the past 5 months produced a unified message about hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and produced similar policies about the drug in the US, Canada, Australia, NZ and western Europe.  The message is that generic, inexpensive hydroxychloroquine (costing only $1.00 to produce a full course) is dangerous and should not be used to treat a potentially fatal disease, Covid-19, for which there are no (other) reliable treatments. 

Hydroxychloroquine has been used safely for 65 years in many millions of patients.  And so the message was crafted that the drug is safe for its other uses, but dangerous when used for Covid-19.  It doesn't make sense, but it seems to have worked.

In the US, "Never Trump" morphed into "Never Hydroxychloroquine," and the result for the pandemic is "Never Over."  But while anti-Trump spin is what characterized suppression strategies in the US, the frauds perpetrated about hydroxychloroquine and the pandemic include most western countries.

Why do I say "Never Over"?  I am expanding on this claim with a), b), c) on August 30. Later in the paper additional evidence is provided.

a) Because if people were treated with HCQ at the onset of their illness, over 99% would quickly resolve the infection, avoiding progression to the late stage disease characterized by cytokine storm, thrombophilia and organ failure. Despite claims to the contrary, this treatment is very safe.  (Yet outpatient treatment is banned in many US states.) 

b) If people were treated prophylactically with this drug (using only 2 tablets weekly) as is done in some areas and some occupational groups in India, there would probably be at least 50% fewer cases after exposure. (Such treatment is currently banned in much of the US, including in my state of Maine.)

c) Protocols for in-hospital treatment (that were unknown during the initial peak of illness in the US and Europe) using HCQ and individually selected blood thinners, steroids, vitamins, zinc and other drugs such as used at NYU, have significantly reduced mortality of the very small number of people who might still progress to a serious illness. (The FDA, however, recommends against the use of HCQ outside of clinical trials, and the CDC and NIH recommend against it.) 

If we followed a), b) and c) the result would be much briefer periods of infectiousness, lower viral loads, less severe illness and considerably less transmission.  The R zero (average number of people each case infects) would drop below one and the pandemic would soon die out.

Were acts to suppress the use of HCQ carefully orchestrated?  You decide.

Might these events have been planned to keep the pandemic going?  To sell expensive drugs and vaccines to a captive population?   Could these acts result in prolonged economic and social hardship, eventually transferring wealth from the middle class to the very rich?  Are these events evidence of a conspiracy?

Here is a list of what happened, in no special order. Please help add to this list if you know of other actions I should include.  This will be a living document, added to as new information becomes available. 

I have penned this as if it is the "To Do" list of items to be accomplished by those who pull the strings.  The items on the list have already been carried out.  One wonders what else might be on their list, yet to be carried out, for this pandemic.
---------------------

1.  You stop doctors from using the drug in ways it is most likely to be effective (in outpatients at onset of illness).  You prohibit use outside of situations you can control.  

Situations that were controlled to show no benefit included 3 large, randomized, multi-center clinical trials (Recovery, Solidarity and REMAP-Covid), the kind of trials that are generally believed to yield the most reliable evidence. However, each of them used excessive hydroxychloroquine doses that were known to be toxic and may have been fatal in some cases; see my previous articles here and here. And a 4th Chinese study that also used excessive doses (3.6 g HCQ in the first three days and 800mg/day thereafter, comparable to the above studies) also found no benefit from HCQ.

2.  You prevent or limit use in outpatients by controlling the supply of the drug, using different methods in different countries and states.  For example, in New York state, by order of the governor, hydroxychloroquine could only be prescribed for hospitalized patients.  In Nevada, the governor outright prohibited both prescribing and dispensing chloroquine drugs for a Covid-19 diagnosis. In New Jersey, the Department of Consumer Affairs required a positive test result before a chloroquine prescription could be dispensed or prescribed. Even back in March, pharmacy boards were coordinating to restrict its use.

France has issued a series of different regulations to limit prescribers from using it.  France's Health Minister also changed the drugs' status from over-the-counter (OTC) to a drug requiring a prescription on January 13.

3.  You play up the danger of the drug, emphasizing side effects that are very rare when the drug is used correctly. You make sure everyone has heard about the man who died after consuming hydroxychloroquine in the form of fish tank cleaner. Yet its toxicity at approved doses is minimal. Chloroquine was added to table salt in some regions in the 1950s as a malaria preventive, according to Professor Nicholas White in his study for the Recovery trial.

4.  You limit clinical trials to hospitalized patients, instead of testing the drug in outpatients, early in the illness, when it is predicted to be most effective.

Finally, but not until May, you have Fauci's NIAID conduct a trial in outpatients, using hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin, but you only enroll 20 patients, after planning for 2,000. You reduce the duration of followup from 24 weeks to 13 days post treatment. You cancel the study after only 5 weeks, claiming inadequate enrollments, even though you have 11 study sites to enroll patients.

5.  You design a series of clinical trials to give much too high a dose, ensuring the drug will cause harm in some subjects, sufficient to mask any possible beneficial effect.  You make sure that trials in 400 hospitals in 35 countries (Solidarity) plus most hospitals in the UK (Recovery) use these dangerous doses, as well as additional sites in 13 countries (REMAP-Covid trial). There were additional Covid-19 trials that used similar excessive doses, such as PATCH, which I have not yet addressed.

6.  You design clinical trials to collect almost no safety data, so any cause of death due to drug toxicity will be attributed to the disease instead of the drug.

7.  You issue rules for use of the drug based on the results of the UK Recovery study, which overdosed patients. Of course the Recovery results showed more deaths in the hydroxychloroquine arm, since they gave patients 2.4 g in the first 24 hours, 800 mg/day thereafter. Furthermore, the UK has the 2nd highest death rate in the world for Covid-19 (Belgium is 1st), so simply conducting the trial in the UK may have contributed to the poor results. 

8.  You publish, in the world's most-read medical journal, the Lancet, an observational study from a massive worldwide database named Surgisphere (which includes 96,000 hospitalized Covid cases) that says use of chloroquine drugs caused significantly increased mortality.  This was said to be the paper to end all controversy about HCQ and Covid-19.  You make sure that all major media report on this result. This was to be the nail in the coffin for hydroxychloroquine. Then you quickly have 3 European countries announce they will not allow doctors to prescribe the drug. Soon additional countries ban its use for Covid.

9.  You do your best to ride out any controversy over the veracity of this paper, never admitting culpability. Even after hundreds of people criticized this Lancet observational study due to easily identified fabrications--the database used in the study did not exist, and the claimed numbers of cases did not agree with known numbers of cases--the Lancet held firm for two weeks, which served to muddy the waters about the trial, until finally 3 of the 4 coauthors (but not the Lancet nor the author who purportedly owned the database) retracted the study. Neither the authors nor the journal have admitted responsibility, let alone explained what it was that induced them to coauthor and publish such an obvious fraud.

You made sure very few media reported that the data were fabricated, the "study" was fraudulent, and the drugs were actually safe. Even though the story of the database company, Surgisphere, was full of scandalous details, most media ignored it.  The story of the study's retraction went largely unnoticed by the public.  You made sure most people remember the original (false) story: that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine frequently kill patients.

10.  You ensure federal agencies like FDA and CDC hew to your desired policies.  Some examples:  a) FDA advised use only in hospitalized patients (too late) and later advised use restricted to only clinical trials (which are limited, are difficult to enroll in, have been halted prematurely, or may use excessive doses). 

b) you have FDA make unsubstantiated and false claims, such as:  "Hospitalized patients were likely to have greater prospect of benefit (compared to ambulatory patients with mild illness)" and claim the chloroquine drugs have a slow onset of action. If that were really true, they would not be used for acute attacks of malaria or in critically ill patients with Covid. (Disclosure:  I once dosed myself with chloroquine for an acute attack of P. vivax malaria, and it worked very fast.).

c) although providing treatment advice is a large part of its mission, CDC instead refers clinicians to the NIH guidelines, discussed below.

d) Despite the fact that Belgium's COVID treatment guidelines repeatedly mention that the doses of HCQ in the Recovery and Solidarity trials were 4 times the cumulative dose used in Belgium, you make sure the Belgian guidelines, paradoxically, only recommend use of HCQ within clinical trials.

11.  You make sure to avoid funding/encouraging clinical trials that test drug combinations like hydroxychloroquine with zinc, with azithromycin, or with both, although there is ample clinical evidence that such combinations provide a cumulative benefit to patients. For example, one study that did look at this combination had no funding.

12.  You have federal and UN agencies make false, illogical claims based on models (or invention) rather than human data.  For example, you have the FDA state on June 15 that the dose required to treat Covid is so high it is toxic, after the Recovery and Solidarity trials have been exposed for toxic dosing.  This scientific double-speak gives some legal cover to the clinical trials that overdosed their patients. According to Denise Hinton, RN, the FDA's Chief Scientist (yes, a registered nurse without scientific qualifications is the Chief Scientist at FDA), or perhaps a clumsy FDA wordsmith: 

"Under the assumption that in vivo cellular accumulation is similar to that from the in vitro cell-based assays, the calculated free lung concentrations that would result from the EUA suggested dosing regimens are well below the in vitro EC50/EC90 values, making the antiviral effect against SARS-CoV-2 not likely achievable with the dosing regimens recommended in the EUA. The substantial increase in dosing that would be needed to increase the likelihood of an antiviral effect would not be acceptable due to toxicity concerns."

You have a WHO report claim toxic doses are needed. This is nonsense since:
  • In 2005, CDC researchers showed strong effects against SARS-1 at safely achievable concentrations.  Here is the relevant quote, "The infectivity of coronaviruses other than SARS-CoV are also affected by chloroquine, as exemplified by the human CoV-229E [15]. The inhibitory effects observed on SARS-CoV infectivity and cell spread occurred in the presence of 1–10 μM chloroquine, which are plasma concentrations achievable during the prophylaxis and treatment of malaria (varying from 1.6–12.5 μM) [26] and hence are well tolerated by patients.” A reader asked me to note that this study was done in tissue culture.
  • the drug at normal doses is being tested in over 30 different medical conditions (see clinicaltrials.gov), and 
  • reports from many different countries say that the drug is effective for Covid-19 at normal doses, while a high dose chloroquine treatment trial was halted in Brazil and a preprint of the study was posted April 11, or perhaps April 7, after finding that drug effects were causing ventricular arrhythmias and deaths. JAMA published the results in their April 24 edition.
  • Toxicity in the Brazilian study was seen after only 3 days of treatment, during which 3.6 grams of chloroquine were administered. But the Solidarity (3.2 grams of hydroxychloroquine in 3 days), Recovery (3.6 grams of hydroxychloroquine in 3 days) and REMAP-Covid trials (3.6 grams of hydroxychloroquine in 3 days) continued overdosing patients until June, or probably longer in the case of REMAP-Covid, despite Brazil's evidence of deaths by overdose.

Tellingly, JAMA editor Gordon Rubenfeld wrote in April, after the Brazilian study came out in JAMA, "if you are prescribing HCQ after these JAMA results, do yourself and your defense lawyer a favor. Document in your medical record that you informed the patient of the potential risks of HCQ including sudden death and its benefits (???)." 

13.  You create an NIH Guidelines committee for Covid treatment recommendations, in which 16 members have or had financial entanglements with Gilead, maker of Remdesivir. The members were appointed by the Co-Chairs.  Two of the three Co-Chairs are themselves financially entangled with Gilead.  Are you surprised that their guidelines recommend specifically against the use of hydroxychloroquine and in favor of Remdesivir, despite a Chinese Phase III study showing no benefit, which was mistakenly posted on the WHO website, then taken down?  The guidelines authors deem their recommendations the new "standard of care." Additional remdesivir studies have shown no clear mortality benefit.

You create an NIH treatment guidelines summary that cherry picks the literature to claim HCQ provides no benefit.

14.  You frighten doctors so they don't prescribe hydroxychloroquine, if prescribing it is even allowed in their jurisdiction, because prescribing outside the new NIH "standard of care" leaves them open to both malpractice lawsuits and potential loss of license.  For example, Michigan's Medical Licensing Board issued the following:

"Prescribing hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine without further proof of efficacy for treating COVID-19 or with the intent to stockpile the drug may create a shortage for patients with lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, or other ailments for which chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are proven treatments. Reports of this conduct will be evaluated and may be further investigated for administrative action... It is also important to be mindful that licensed health professionals are required to report inappropriate prescribing practices." 

In other words, Michigan pharmacists are required to snitch on doctors prescribing the drugs for Covid.

You further tell doctors (through the FDA) they need to monitor a variety of lab parameters and EKGs when using the drug, although this was never advised before, which makes it very difficult to use the drug in outpatients. You have the European Medicines Agency issue similar warnings. In Australia only physicians in certain specialties are allowed to prescribe the drug for Covid. And in Queensland, physicians or pharmacists who do not comply (for example, by prescribing the drug for prevention of Covid) face up to 6 months' imprisonment and a fine up to $13,000 Australian dollars.

15.  You manage to control the conduct of most trials around the world by specially designing the WHO-managed Solidarity trials, currently conducted in 35 countries. WHO halted hydroxychloroquine clinical trials around the world, twice. The first time, May 25, WHO claimed it was in response to the (fraudulent) Lancet study.  The second time, June 17, WHO claimed the stop was in response to the Recovery trial results.  Recovery used highly toxic doses of hydroxychloroquine in over 1500 patients, of whom 396 died.  You stop the trial before the data safety monitoring board has looked at your data, a move that is unlikely to be consistent with trial protocol. WHO's trial in over 400 hospitals overdosed patients with 2.0 g hydroxychloroquine in the first 24 hours.  The trial was halted 3 days after the toxic doses were exposed (by me). The trial involved doctors around the world typing minimal patient information into an online WHO platform, which assigned the patient a treatment.

The only "safety" information collected during the trial was whether patients required oxygen, required a ventilator, or died. This effectively masked the adverse effects of the drugs tested.  

I should mention that WHO's initial plan for its Solidarity trial entirely omitted the chloroquine drugs, but they were added at the urging of participating nations. WHO's fallback position appears to have been to use toxic doses.

16.  You have the WHO pressure governments to stop doctors prescribing hydroxychloroquine. 

17.  You have the WHO pressure professional societies to stop doctors prescribing hydroxychloroquine.

18.  You make sure that the most-consulted US medical encyclopedia, UptoDate, advises physicians to restrict hydroxychloroquine to only clinical trials, citing the FDA.

19.  You have the head of the Coronavirus Task Force, Dr. Tony Fauci, insist the drug cannot be used in the absence of strong evidence...while he insisted exactly the opposite in the case of the MERS coronavirus outbreak several years ago, when he recommended an untested drug combination for use...which had been developed for that purpose by his agency.  And while he was bemoaning the lack of evidence, he was refusing to pay for trials to study hydroxychloroquine, and cancelled two NIAID-sponsored trials of outpatient HCQ before completion. And he changed the goalposts on the Remdesivir trial, not once but twice, to make Remdesivir show a tiny bit of benefit, but no mortality benefit. Yet don't forget, Fauci was thrilled to sponsor a trial of a Covid vaccine (partly owned by his agency) in humans, before there were any data from animal studies.  So much for Fauci's requirement for high quality evidence, before risking use of drugs and vaccines in humans.

20.  You convince the population that the crisis will be long-lasting. You have the 2nd richest man in the world, and biggest funder of the WHO, Bill Gates, keep repeating to the media megaphone that we cannot go back to normal until everyone has been vaccinated or there is a perfect drug.  (The Gates Foundation helped design the WHO Solidarity trial, which says only that it has multiple funders,  helped fund the Recovery trial, and Gates is heavily invested in Covid pharmaceuticals and vaccines.)

21.  You have CDC (with help from FDA) prevent the purchase of coronavirus test kits from Germany, China, WHO, etc, and fail to produce a valid test kit themselves. The result was that during January and February, US cases could not be tested, and for months thereafter insufficient and unreliable test kits made it impossible to track the epidemic and stop the spread.

22.  You have trusted medical spokesmen lie to the public about the pandemic's severity, so precautions weren't taken when they might have been more effective and less long-lasting.  Congress was repeatedly briefed about the pandemic in January and February, which scared several Congress members enough that they sold off large amounts of stock, risking insider trading charges.  Senator Burr is one of them, currently under investigation for major stock sales on February 13.

Yet Dr. Fauci told USA Today on February 17 that Americans should worry more about the flu than about coronavirus, the danger of which was "just miniscule." Then on February 28, Drs. Fauci and Robert Redfield (CDC Director) wrote in the New England Journal:

"...the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively."

23.  You destroy the reputation of respected physicians who stand in your way.  Professor Didier Raoult and his team in Marseille have used hydroxychloroquine on over 4,000 patients, reporting a mortality rate of about 0.8%.  (The mortality rate of patients given hydroxychloroquine in the Recovery trial was 25.7%.) Raoult is very famous for discovering over 100 different microorganisms, and finding the long-sought cause of Whipple's Disease.  With this reputation, Raoult apparently thought he could treat patients as he saw fit, which he has done, under great duress.  Raoult was featured in a New York Times Magazine article, with his face on the magazine cover, on May 12, 2020.  After describing his considerable accomplishments, the Times very unfavorably discussed his personality, implied he conducted unethical trials without approval, and using anonymous sourcing produced a detailed hit piece. Raoult is now considered an unreliable crank in the US.

You gather a group of Yale professors to dispute their Yale professor colleague Harvey Risch, an MD, PhD epidemiologist, on his publications and vocal support of the benefits of HCQ for Covid. Their first argument is that he is not an infectious disease doctor.  Notably, the first signer of the statement opposing Dr. Risch is an economist.

Physician and state senator Scott Jensen of Minnesota is being investigated by his state medical board due to anonymous complaints about 'spreading misinformation' and giving 'reckless advice' about COVID in interviews. Jensen was previously selected as "Family Physician of the Year" in his state. Now his medical license is at risk, not because of how he treated a patient, but for what he said outside of the office. Unprecedented.
UPDATE:  Jensen was exonerated.

24.  You have social media platforms ban content that does not agree with the desired narrative.  As YouTube CEO and ex-wife of Google founder Sergey Brin, Susan Wojcicki said,

“YouTube will ban any content containing medical advice that contradicts World Health Organisation (WHO) coronavirus recommendations. Anything that would go against World Health Organisation recommendations would be a violation of our policy.”

25.  When your clinical trials are criticized for overdosing patients, you quickly have Oxford-affiliated, Wellcome Trust-supported scientists at Mahidol University publish papers (a literature review with modeling and a modeling study) purporting to show that the doses used were not toxic. You develop a new method to measure hydroxychloroquine in a handful of Recovery patients who were not poisoned.  However, there are 2 problems you forgot with this approach: 
  • The Brazilian data, including 16 deaths, extensive clinical information and documented ventricular arrhythmias, are much more persuasive than a theoretical model of hydroxychloroquine pharmacokinetics.
  • Either the drug is too toxic to use, even at normal doses, for a life-threatening disease, or even extremely high doses are safe.  You can't have it both ways.

Oxford is the institution running the Recovery trial, and invented a Covid vaccine that already has 400 million doses on order.  The Wellcome Trust funded the Recovery trial.

26.  You change your trial's primary outcome measures after the trials have started, in order to prevent detection of drug-induced deaths (Recovery) or to make your drug appear to have efficacy (NIAID Remdesivir trial).

27.  You stop manufacturers from supplying the drug. Shortly after the fraudulent Lancet paper came out, Sanofi announced it would no longer supply the drug for use with Covid, and would halt its two hydroxychloroquine clinical trials. One of the cancelled Sanofi trials was expected to test 210 outpatients early in the course of disease. The trial remains suspended at the time of writing, while the Lancet paper was retracted 13 days after publication.  You surely don't want a trial of hydroxychloroquine treatment early in the disease, since it might show an excellent effect.

Sanofi (a pharma company) began acting like a regulator.  From the Australian DOH's Therapeutic Goods Administration website:

Sanofi, the supplier of one of the hydroxychloroquine products marketed in Australia (Plaquenil), has also written to health professionals reinforcing that hydroxychloroquine is not approved for use in Australia for treatment of COVID-19 outside the confines of a clinical trial. Sanofi also reinforced some of the known risks of prescribing hydroxychloroquine, in particular potentially serious cardiac issues. Globally, Sanofi has received an increased number of reports of serious cardiac issues, including deaths, in patients treated with hydroxychloroquine, This appears to be more common in patients also treated with other medicines that can affect the heart.

Then Sanofi started collecting information on all off-label use of hydroxychloroquine in New Zealand and Australia.  Why is Sanofi, a drug manufacturing company, becoming a surveillance/enforcement mechanism intended to frighten medical providers from using the drug for Covid, which use is by definition "off label." Sanofi alternatively suggests one may report (anonymously or not) others' off-label use to New Zealand's Pharmacovigilance Center or the Australian equivalent.

And see this: Novartis will supply HCQ only under certain conditions, and halted its HCQ trial due to lack of enrollments, although enrollment was not an issue for its other COVID trials.

28. You attempt to retract published papers that provide evidence to support use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID.

29. You have your 'bought' scientists conceal their financial conflicts of interest in their HCQ clinical trials and publications as well as in the guidelines they produce.

30. You can get your experimental, unlicensed drugs tested, much more expeditiously and cheaply than under ordinary circumstances, on Covid patients in large clinical trials, but only as long as no drug is designated effective for the condition. This opportunity only lasts while the "standard of care" for early Covid disease is nothing more than supportive measures, since no drug is deemed effective.

31. You have a research organization with big Pharma members (A.O.K.I.) pressure the Russian Ministry of Health to remove hydroxychloroquine from its treatment guidelines.

32. You stopped use of hydroxychloroquine, allegedly in response to the fabricated Lancet study, in France, Italy and Belgium (countries with very high COVID mortality rates) then Portugal then Switzerland. But Switzerland restarted using HCQ 15 days later. This created a natural experiment in Switzerland. About 2 weeks after hydroxychloroquine use was halted, death rates approximately tripled, for about 15 days. Then, after its use was allowed again, two weeks later death rates from Covid fell back to their baseline. (Thanks to FranceSoir:

33.  You reverse an old trick of clinical trials, to mask benefit of hydroxychloroquine.  The trick was to replace the saline placebo with a substance that is being used by many clinicians and in many trials against Covid, thus by comparison likely to reduce the positive effect of your tested medication. This was done in trials both at NYU and at University of Washington, using vitamin C or vitamin C plus folate respectively as placebos.

34. You have the chief medical officers of Wales, England, Scotland and Northern Ireland, and the director of the UK's National Health Service, write to UK doctors, a) urging them to enroll their Covid patients in one of 3 national clinical trials, two of which greatly overdosed patients with hydroxychloroquine, and b) stopping their use of "off license treatments" outside of a trial. Yet again, we encounter a veiled threat against clinicians actually attempting to treat the primary SARS-Cov-2 infection. The chief doctors wrote:

While it is for every individual clinician to make prescribing decisions, we strongly discourage the use of off-licence treatments outside of a trial, where participation in a trial is possible... Any treatment given for coronavirus other than general supportive care, treatment for underlying conditions, and antibiotics for secondary bacterial complications, should currently be as part of a trial, where that is possible."

35.   You have a state Pharmacy Board refuse to dispense hydroxychloroquine outside of clinical trials on June 15, citing the FDA recommendation for use only in trials.  You issue this new regulation on the same day that FDA publishes its recommendation, indicating prior coordination. But when your regulation is exposed on July 14, you immediately rescind it. 

36.  You have the IMF offer rapid financing to Belarus, but only if it follows the recommended model of Covid response and imposes quarantines, isolation and curfews.

37.  A group of doctors went to Washington DC July 27-28.  They called themselves "America's Frontline Doctors" and gave a press conference and livestream talks about the Covid-19 pandemic as well as about the need for physicians to be able to prescribe HCQ freely.  While the media sparsely attended the press conference, the livestream got millions of views. And within hours, their livestream was banned by Google, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter.  Twitter was said to additionally ban comments about its ban. Then Squarespace took down the Frontline Doctors' website. 

38. After the HCQ issue got so much attention on social media, you impose another ban on July 29 on the prescribing of HCQ for Covid, starting July 30 in Ohio, using its Pharmacy Board to dictate to physicians what they may not prescribe. (A repeat of #35 in a different state.) Ohio, with the governor's approval, had first limited hydroxychloroquine dispensing on March 22. At least 3 other states limited its dispensing at the same time.

This ban got so much attention that Republican Governor Mike DeWine rescinded it the next morning. DeWine claimed to agree with FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn, who said in a July 30 TV interview that the prescribing of HCQ is between a doctor and patient. This is in accord with FDA law; but then, why was FDA silent when pharmacy boards, governors and other state entities prevented the prescribing of this FDA-approved drug in their jurisdictions?

39.  After having Google take down physician James Todaro's article on hydroxychloroquine for 4 months, you allow it to resurface right before Google's (and Facebook's and Amazon's and Apple's) CEOs testify before Congress on July 29 on censorship and abuse of power. You have Twitter warn that Todaro's article is at an unsafe link.

40.  After massive attention to the banning of the videos posted by the physician group 'America's Frontline Physicians' and its website, you make intense efforts to discredit the physicians involved. 

MedPageToday claimed it
 "could find no evidence that any of the speakers worked in hospitals with significant numbers of COVID-19 patients." But the doctors claimed they used the drug early and prevented hospitalizations and deaths.  With over 4.4 million Americans diagnosed with Covid, what doctor hasn't seen a Covid patient? 

USAToday blared the headline: 
'America's Frontline Doctors' may be real doctors, but experts say they don't know what they're talking about.

You have USA Today review and publish detailed information on the licenses, practice locations and malpractice histories of the doctors who spoke out. USAT reporters claim these doctors are not experts and lack knowledge about the use of HCQ in Covid-19, despite the fact that most work in primary care, urgent care or emergency medicine and report using the drug for Covid. Yet no one asks how many years ago 'expert' Tony Fauci last treated a patient? 'Expert' Deborah Birx' medical license expired in 2014, so she hasn't treated a Covid patient either.  BTW, she worked in Fauci's lab between 1983 and 1986.

41.  Hydroxychloroquine use is truly the wedge issue for understanding and turning around the pandemic.  If hydroxychloroquine works reasonably well as a prophylactic and treatment for Covid-19, it could potentially end the severity of the pandemic, greatly reduce transmission, and return us to life as we knew it.  You must make use of the levers of government, plus mainstream media and social media, to stop that from happening.

So, just in case doctors thought the Frontline Doctors' video, or a new study from Spain showing the drug's usefulness meant they should use hydroxychloroquine to treat Covid, you must act fast. You use Representatives at a Congressional health subcommittee hearing on July 29 to threaten doctors about one use of the drug last April, in veterans who were nursing home patients.  Per the Washington Post:

"doctors at the 238-bed nursing home dosed [30] patients with what came to be called a “covid cocktail” for more than two weeks in April, often over the objections of nurses and without the full knowledge of residents’ families. At least 11 residents received the drug even though they had not been tested for covid-19, The Post found."

I have treated patients in nursing homes, and one rarely discusses medication changes with family, unless the patient is seriously ill.  When nursing home residents were dying like flies last April, when tests were hard to come by, and confirmed diagnoses few and far between, doctors used this medicine to try to prevent nursing home deaths during a pandemic. And now they are being scapegoated for doing so.

The WaPo article does not even tell us whether the patients survived, thrived or were harmed. The article hardly makes sense. Its only purpose is to blacken the drug and the physicians who use it.

Yet on August 27, with respect to HCQ's use in nursing homes, Senators Warren, Wyden and Casey demanded that FDA and Medicare/Medicaid explain how they are tracking it, and also demanded an Inspector General investigation into its recent use in nursing homes. "The Trump Administration owes us answers on the use of an ineffective drug like hydroxychloroquine in nursing homes — the epicenter of the pandemic,” Elizabeth Warren said in a statement. 

42.  You use state Medical Licensing Boards to threaten doctors who claim there is a cure for Covid-19. 

43.  You have Dr. Fauci discredit published observational studies that show benefit during a Congressional hearing, demanding randomized controlled trials.  Fauci never tells the Committee he has cancelled the one randomized controlled trial of HCQ that his agency, NIAID, had promised to conduct on HCQ.  NIAID claimed that it could not enroll enough subjects, and the study was cancelled after only 20 were enrolled.  However, Fauci told the Committee that 250,000 Americans have shown interest in participating in trials of a Covid vaccine. It is difficult to reconcile such extreme lack of interest in a treatment trial, and such massive interest in a vaccine trial.  

Doctors who wrote studies showing HCQ benefit, even when used late (50% mortality reduction) have defended their work from Fauci's criticism of it to Congress.

44.  You erode the doctor's primary responsibility to the patient, replacing it with the need to perform clinical research. This is the first time I have ever heard such a thing in the US: research physicians are pressuring frontline doctors not to veer from protocol-determined treatment, even when patients enrolled in treatment trials are at risk of death. 'Helping future patients' is the rationale provided. 

Need I say this was the justification for the Nazi doctors' experiments? It was not accepted at Nuremberg and it shouldn't be accepted now. Medical ethics are no mystery. As published in the JAMA, and accepted worldwide, the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki, a.k.a. "Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects" states,

While the primary purpose of medical research is to generate new knowledge, this goal can never take precedence over the rights and interests of individual research subjects.

45. You use the term "stellar" to describe the Recovery trial in the August 5, 2020 NY Times, but avoid any hint that the Recovery trial's hydroxychloroquine arm gave 1500 patients a toxic, potentially lethal dose, of whom over 25% died.

46.  You censure and oust from the Detroit Democrats a state legislator because she credited HCQ for saving her life when she had Covid-19, and she publicly thanked President Trump for bringing the drug to her attention. It had been extremely difficult for her to obtain the drug, because her governor, Gretchen Whitmer, had banned use of the drug for Covid.

47.  Despite assuring you control the outcome of the vast majority of randomized clinical trials of the chloroquine drugs, you have been thwarted by physician researchers in DetroitSpainItalyFranceSaudi Arabia who publish their observational results with hydroxychloroquine, showing the drug dramatically reduces mortality from Covid.  

Doctors in Turkey, the US and Canada, and the US show that HCQ's cardiac toxicity is negligible. So you have frontman Tony Fauci repeatedly dismiss this evidence from thousands of patients, since it did not come from randomized controlled trials.  See c19study.com for a compilation of 99 (58 peer reviewed) studies of the chloroquine drugs in Covid-19, and convince yourself what the overall data truly show.

48.  You have Wikipedia write the following about Covid and HCQ:  "all clinical trials conducted during 2020 found it is ineffective and may cause dangerous side effects."  The footnotes refer to only a handful of trials, while a compilation of all 99 studies (of different types, including meta-analyses and observational studies) on the drug in Covid-19 tells a completely different story. 

49.  You electronically disappear articles favorable to HCQ. A meta-analysis preprint of 41 studies of EARLY HCQ use, written by US physicians, is posted at this link on the ResearchGate site, 
which hosts a collection of academic papers. The article rapidly disappeared from the link.  Here is a brief description of the article:

Prodromos et al., Preprint, doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.29781.65765 (meta analysis)

Hydroxychloroquine is Effective and Safe for the Treatment of COVID-19, and May be Universally Effective When Used Early Before Hospitalization: A Systematic Review

Meta analysis of 41 studies concluding: "HCQ has been shown to have consistent clinical efficacy for COVID-19 when it is used early in the outpatient setting, and in general would appear to work better the earlier it is used. Overall HCQ is effective against COVID-19. There is no credible evidence that HCQ results in worsening of COVID-19. HCQ has been shown to be safe for the treatment of COVID-19 when responsibly used."

A reader (later) sent me another working link for the full text here.

50.  Can we begin to connect the dots between those who fraudulently suppressed effective treatments for Covid-19, and those who wish to maintain the pandemic crisis to remake the world? Today, on 9/11, Oxford epidemiologist Dr. Peter Horby, a principal investigator for the Recovery trial in which 396 people who were overdosed with hydroxychloroquine died, retweeted a tweet from the World Economic Forum about the environmental benefits of using bicycles.  Horby added, "This is where we need to be headed."

51.  From Anthony Fauci, who has perhaps done more than any other person to besmirch the value of HCQ and prevent Covid patients being treated effectively, comes a statement that seems to hearken to the World Economic Forum sentiment in #50 above.  Fauci blames the pandemic (which his actions prolong) on humans damaging nature.  And he suggests we must learn to live differently, in harmony with nature.  

And now, suddenly, I understand why it is so important to claim the pandemic came from human encroachment on bat territory, and not from a lab accident. Because human encroachment is being positioned to take the blame for Covid-19. (SARS-1, Ebola and SARS-2 are claimed to have arisen from humans living too close to bats, eating them and getting infected, starting epidemics--but this has not been proven for either SARS epidemic, nor proven for the Ebola epidemics.). This is not Fauci waxing eloquent about nature. This is Fauci, Americas Doctor, starting the conversation about how the human population, not the bat virus, is the real underlying problem.

The quote below was published in the journal Cell, in the final paragraph, on September 3 by Fauci and Morens:
"The COVID-19 pandemic is yet another reminder, added to the rapidly growing archive of historical reminders, that in a human-dominated world, in which our human activities represent aggressive, damaging, and unbalanced interactions with nature, we will increasingly provoke new disease emergences. We remain at risk for the foreseeable future. COVID-19 is among the most vivid wake-up calls in over a century. It should force us to begin to think in earnest and collectively about living in more thoughtful and creative harmony with nature, even as we plan for nature’s inevitable, and always unexpected, surprises."
Are they hinting that a reduced human population will be less susceptible to pandemics? Or that rural populations need to move?

52.  Even though the famous Mehra/Desai Lancet paper claiming HCQ and CQ caused hugely increased deaths was exposed as a total fabrication by the Lancet editor and retracted on June 4, the Washington Post today, on September 11, links to its favorable May 22 story about the Mehra/Desai paper--using it as the sole evidence for yet another false claim of the danger of hydroxychloroquine. 

This despite the fact that the WaPo reported on June 2  about concerns regarding the paper's authenticity. The New York Times ran at least 3 articles about the fabricated Mehra/Desai paper here, here and here, and you know the WaPo reads what the NYT reports.

You neuter criticism electronically by making it hard to read.  I commented on the 9/11 article in the WaPo, and its gratuitous slur against HCQ, in which WaPo cited as authority a fabricated paper.  I used the online comment form.  I am a subscriber. The WaPo printed my comment, but my comment seems to be the only comment whose words extend beyond the right margin, and are chopped off. How odd. 


 ------------------------

Remember:  the system would not be going to these lengths if hydroxychloroquine didn't work. Please think about that.

------------------------

The People and the Professionals Fight Back

I am starting a new "live" list of ways in which the people are pushing back against the abrogation of our rights, the propagation of lies, and our ability to access the medical care we choose. Please help contribute to it.

1.  A huge Thank You goes to FranceSoir, which has covered the hydroxychloroquine restrictions in a long series of articles, has done the digging that the mainstream media refuses to do, and has brought the issue before a judge.  The judge ruled that a Press Release issued on May 27 by France's Minister of Solidarity and Health, informing doctors they cannot use hydroxychloroquine for Covid, has no legal meaning, and cannot restrict the prescribing of medicines by France's medical providers.

2. Italian citizens take their government to court over the handling of the pandemic and the lockdown.

3.  Skye News Australia presents information on the effective responses to the pandemic in Sweden and Switzerland.  The pandemic is over in Sweden.  Switzerland proved (again) the benefits of HCQ used at the proper dose, in conjunction with other drugs/supplements.  "The destruction of our economies was completely pointless."

4.  The statistical methods of 3 major, randomized controlled trials of hydroxychloroquine efficacy in Covid have been questioned by a large group of statisticians, researchers and clinicians.  All 3 trials were inadequately powered, with large p values. In fact, evaluated differently, "the evidence from all these trials points to [HCQ] treatment effectiveness" according to the group of professionals providing the critique.

5.  The assertion that antibodies only last a few months, and therefore immunity wanes rapidly, seems to be another misleading claim from the fake-science influencers.  As with many other viruses, T and B lymphocytes are critical for coronavirus immunity, and a lot more durable than antibodies. From a U. Washington study, "the SARS-CoV-2-specific memory lymphocytes exhibited characteristics associated with potent antiviral immunity: memory T cells secreted IFN-γ and expanded upon antigen re-encounter, while memory B cells expressed receptors capable of neutralizing virus when expressed as antibodies."

6.  The governor of Minnesota on August 12 rescinded his state's ban on the use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine for Covid.

7.  Three US Senators demand answers from the FDA on what evidence it used to recommend against outpatient treatment with HCQ, whether states have the right to regulate what drugs can be used, etc.  Very powerful letter that cuts to the heart of the legal confusion regarding HCQ restrictions.

8. Marchers from Germany and beyond planned a huge demonstration against Covid restrictions in Berlin on August 29.  Thousands of police will line the streets. As reported in The Hill on August 26, "
Officials in Berlin are banning demonstrations against coronavirus prevention measures, calling the protests themselves a breach of social distancing rules." However, at the eleventh hour, the German courts ruled against the government, and the demonstration will proceed legally.

Perhaps it is notable that anti-restriction demonstrators are said to be on the left in Germany, but said to be on the right in the US.  Maybe these distinctions lack actual meaning?

9. Panamanian physician and government advisor Sanchez Cardenas notes that when HCQ was banned in Panama, deaths shot up, and when it was allowed again, deaths were reduced. He is working to change their treatment protocol and provide a legal basis for HCQ's use.

10. Australian Member of Parliament Craig Kelly repeatedly speaks out against the banning of HCQ, including in Parliament. Attempts to censure him have so far failed.

11.  Guyana's Ministry of Health goes public with an announcement that frontline healthcare workers in Guyana have been receiving HCQ as prophylaxis against Covid-19. According to Dr. Anthony, the feedback received from doctors suggests that the drug has been effective.

12.  Attorneys in Ohio file suit over the lockdown measures and other rules put into place as a result of Covid-19.  Psychiatrist Peter Breggin has posted all the case documents and his affidavit here, along with links to many other papers and documents relevant to  SARS-C0V-2.

13.  @ArtLeroux has connected the Remdesivir manufacturer, Gilead, with anti-HCQ propaganda.  In a Gilead-sponsored symposium, every speaker except one has written that HCQ does not work.  "
During the National Days of Infectious Disease organized by the famous SPILF, sponsored symposia take place, including one by Gilead. Among the speakers, ALL those who have spoken or written on the subject have pleaded the ineffectiveness of hydroxychloroquine. All except De Truchis."


39 comments:

Aces&Eights said...

If I were to test positive where can I go? Who can I see that will treat me with "hydroxychloroquine" in the US, I believe in this therapy 1000%

A.C. Faraday
acfaraday62@gmail.com

Meryl Nass, M.D. said...

It depends what your state or country allows. I would discuss it with your physician now, so you know how to manage if you get Covid-19

John said...

Tragic Beyond words! My compliments on your bold stand against this bigger then Goliath Monsters in your vision scope.

If it is not dangerous pesticides sprayed in record amounts often above limits in US, banned in eu for high cancer risk then it’s chemo and radiation for some cancers with no proven efficacy. Seeing when watching hopeless cancer patients one after the next walk the often ship hopeless planks overboards one after next dead again on chemo when known advanced stage metastasis liver carcinoma fancy term for “cancer” stage 3 and 4 chemo for chemo or no chemo about equal in ideal chemo conditions in current 5 yr survival rates yet on the chemo dead in months as known expected actually sicker chemo side effects.

In 2020 running towards Chief Sitting Bull a warrior cousin of Medicine Woman Physician Meryl Nass MD. Knees for the football games of laypeople as stricken patients with hindered physicians from those in charge nonetheless in positions to navigate medicine as critical patients often too sick to read through huge data bases if open to get to points of conflicting documentation. Perhaps case seeing another sent down the river to then make changes that bigger team of physicians may readily agree not in rare instances but large percentages in more and more diseases with less effective treatments in place from big pharma influence for business not cure. Especially of concern too supercomputers admitted programming interference online where people may not know conversations talking to are computer programs simulations of person when not with false profiles generation all over online as detailed in Facebook connection to CIA examples years after the fact. Thus, those extremely good looking profiles photos requesting to follow in friends was merely computer generated insults by CIA engineers and others Project Naomi programs in warped dishonesty intelligence agency litany of atrocities on citizens many documented many likely not. To where it gets to the point when calling your hospitals, push the 4 button if your in a coma from it all with Covid19 too?

Frankly the entire medical establishment is way out of bounds from fact after fact to anyone reading and focus attention on various aspects falling out of wack in areas that make ones head fall off here there and everywhere literally wonder if Big Pharma Metaphor for Nurse Ratchets in Jack Nicholson One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, nowadays bulk of patients starring in Another One Flying Into big pharm’s Nurse Ratched’s meds Cuckoo NE$T$ insurance coverage whole body lobotomies guaranteed few seconds to say no if see?

Rotten Shenanigans HCV HDV WNV Lyme gW$ Cancer withheld 1987 PEP antidotes ongoing with California only PEP over the counter in 2020 that anyone could need if need for rape, huge increases in autism as the “new normal”, elder old folks home documentation often massive widespread corruption etc seemingly bigger and bigger. HCV quagmires where if lousy coverage different path with many deliberately not tested as high treatment cost unless better coverage maybe. Along with incomplete in public domain HCV HDV etc epidemiologies as perplexing too the sudden serious retroviruses popping up when labs coincidentally manipulated viruses particularly retroviruses as the science became available. Wuhan Covid19 most extraordinary peculiarities US and China dual operated lab with pursuant hide and seek charades following with better physicians including Meryl Nass calling olly olly oxen free!

TuvanDrone said...

Great summary of the fraud being perpetrated, Dr. Nass. You are welcome to use any of this additional information, without attribution, if you find it helpful:

https://1drv.ms/b/s!Aq8aFLg55eqxgtEXNBDjPGR0v8Fd1w?e=RMGqot

(PDF - too big to post in comment)

Christopher said...

I telephoned my local pharmacist and asked if they stock hydroxychloroquine. They said yes they do, but they are not allowed to fill a RX for any other treatment than for what it is officially designated. In other words, they cannot fill a RX to treat COVID-19 as it is "off label". Since when can Dr's be prevented from prescribing medicines for off label treatments?

Meryl Nass, M.D. said...

It is really unprecedented. This AMA collection lists the rules each state put in place regarding hydroxychloroquine, last updated 4/27

Paul Picha said...

I'm sharing this info widely with my loved ones and friends. Thank you Dr. Nass

MaryP said...

WHO IS "YOU"????

Jerry said...

You fund "gain-of-function" research into coronaviruses, whose goal is to create new varieties that are highly infectious to human beings. Then you carry out the research in poorly secured Chinese laboratories, so that sooner or later there will be an "accidental" release. Then you write papers explaining that the released virus must have come from a food market.

Oliveoilguy said...

Dear Dr. Nass,
Thank you for compiling this list....I was aware of most of it because I’ve been following Peak Prosperity. There are a number of Doctors who contribute to the conversation and there is an excellent thread going called “Hydroxychloroquine vs. the deep state”. Your contribution would make this amazing forum that reaches 1/2 million people so much better.
Oliveoilguy

John said...

Letter released from President Trump's physician. The letter states
‪@realDonaldTrump‬
does not have ‪#COVID19‬, while detailing that he is taking ‪#Hydroxychloroquine‬
‪@News12NJ‬

https://twitter.com/ericlandskroner/status/1262558679473303554

https://www.wsbradio.com/blog/jamie-dupree/trump-taking-hydroxychloroquine-defend-against-coronavirus/n2664XeC4v7NRDOzZAPQJK/

Growing Unpopular Far Right Neo Fascists Brazil Leader Get US Hydroxychloroquine
https://www.thetelegram.com/news/world/us-sends-brazil-2-million-doses-of-hydroxychloroquine-drug-touted-by-trump-456043/

Growing Unpopular leader in Brazil Called Neo Fascists on List In 2018
https://mobile.twitter.com/fxterrones/status/1050273096282894336?ref_url=https%3a%2f%2fremezcla.com%2fmusic%2froger-waters-brazil-neo-fascist%2f

Certainly the White House Doc Could Call Press Conferences with Easily Assembled Team on Hydroxchloroquine as Prophylactics along with PEP too while at it, but certainly likely Neo Fascism Growing In Medicine for Decades likely Not Going to Care Happening Though Drop of a Pencil if any Trump needed PEP with Vegas Trip With Latest Neo Stormy Prescribed Pronto too while no ongoing “Neo normal” if raped or condom issue for teenager needs it in most places. Speaks for itself 4 years after 2016. Hitler concurs no doubt too.

https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2020/06/04/malaria-drug-fails-to-prevent-covid-19-in-a-rigorous-study/

For example, the central mechanism of action of hydroxychloroquine, and its effectiveness in combating COVID-19, can now be fully explained and understood. What this mechanism consists of is immediately stated: the drug, by binding itself permanently with ferriprotoporphyrin (of the Hb group Eme), removes the substrate from the viral proteins and also becomes an important means of prophylaxis. Although there are still no Italian publications on the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine as a "shield" from the virus, among the directors of infectious disease departments, specialists, primary care physicians, and general practitioners contacted during this research, many have admitted – under the subheading – to using the drug as a “prophylaxis”, i.e., to prevent contagion.
Healthcare professionals who are in close contact with infectious patients take the drug, Hydroxychloroquine in advance, precisely to decrease the likelihood of infection. For now, there is a recent publication, involving 211 people, to support this ”prophylactic” effect. It was published in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, the official organ of the International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Of 211 people exposed to COVID-19 positive individuals and prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine, none were infected.

Finally, further confirmation of this hypothesis is provided by the data collected in the register of the SIR (Italian Society of Rheumatology). In order to evaluate the possible correlations between chronic patients and COVID-19 SIR interviewed 1,200 rheumatologists throughout Italy to collect statistics on contagions. Out of an audience of 65,000 chronic patients (Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis), who systematically take Plaquenil/hydroxychloroquine, only 20 patients tested positive for the virus. Nobody died, and nobody is in intensive care, according to the data collected so far.

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3840620/posts

Unknown said...

Dear sir,
For me, this article is a confirmation of the fact that our health system is corrupt. That's why I decided two month ago, after reading the report of Dr Vladimir Zelenko healing 1400 outpatients of covid-19, to buy the medicines myself, without a doctor. I bought 100 gram HCQ in China at Alibaba ( 99.7 % HCQ, HPLC ), I bought pills of 50 mg zinc as zincgluconate, I bought Azithromycine on an English website. Then I bought empty HPMC-capsules type "1 " to fill each with 200 mg HCQ. Now I am prepared when the infection with covid-19 may come. My determination for action is inspired by the fact that I think the whole health system is corrupt. And this article confirms my thoughts. Thank you so much.

Unknown said...

Dear Madam,

I forgot to mention that the dispatching of HCQ was protected by calling the HCQ "White Pigment " So the customs inspection could not block the import of HCQ. They valued the product 10 USD to prevent import tax. I weighed the 200 mg HCQ per capsule type "1 " with a precision balance CT-250 ( 84 € ). But at arrival I checked the identity of the product by determination of the melting point.This has to be 240 degrees Celcius. I also measured 240 degrees Celcius. I appreciate your article very much. We need more people like you.
P.S. Sorry for calling you "sir" in my first comment

Anonymous said...

The WHO is getting it’s covid-19 information from the internet apparently so I’m not getting my information from the WHO.

https://www.businessinsider.com/who-changes-timeline-first-coronavirus-report-from-internet-china-2020-7

Jorge Cerra said...

Everything around the dogmatic treatment of the infection is very strange. It curtails the criteria of experienced Doctors, it incurres in gross mistakes, it has a totalitarian lack of transparency and the scent of fabrication. I took cloroquine for two years in Africa and I was healthy. Another thing difficult to understand is that only now the official gurus of this pandemic have discovered the benefits of corticoides against an illness that provokes an hyper-reaction of the immune system. Very strange.

Unknown said...

The Henry Ford results have been published, and the authors suggest that early administration of the drug was probably partially responsible for its success, yet they still claim that it should only be used in an inpatient setting. Why not allow its use in outpatient settings to PREVENT hospitalizations rather than making patients wait until they are sick enough to be hospitalized to be offered this treatment?

Rob Bots said...

Dear Meryl,
See:
https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Response-to-Mr.-David-Spencer-ELSEVIER.pdf

Shaun in Alberta said...

Thanks for this. It's nice to see so much data in one place. I have a few suggestions:

1) regarding point 19, is Fauci's wife the FDA official responsible for authorizing relaxation of testing protocols (i.e.; the animal tests on vaccines)? A facebook page aledges this in a post at https://www.facebook.com/innate82/posts/3068479443242682

2) I don't believe you mention the fatal dose of CQ or HCQ or who pegged it. I have heard it was a man named Weniger in 1979 who told the WHO that 1.5-2 g was fatal.

3) Also pertinent, I believe, is "Event 201". Not only is the timing suspicious, but the video I've watched so far seem to dwell on two things:
a) An automatic assumption that a medical response to any pandemic will require new intellectual property, along with all the public funds for research, relaxed safety testing protocols, and liability indemnity that make it profitable. I have seen nothing to suggest that any research would involve reviewing publicly-available literature on existing medicines.
b) An obsession with controlling the narrative: In the 12-minute "highlight reel", about half the clip seems to be discussion about impressing upon the tech companies that they have a duty to censor "mis-information".

Meryl Nass, M.D. said...

1. Fauci's wife Christine Grady (RN and PhD) is head of clinical ethics, so it is likely she was involved with approving the unusual pace of study of the Moderna vaccine which NIAID is heavily invested in, financially and wrt prestige.

However, FDA had to approve the trial and so blame needs to be placed there, as this is the first time I have heard of testing humans prior to animal trials. The FDA regs seem to prohibit it.

2. I discovered Weniger's 1979 report and wrote about it here:
https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2020/06/who-trial-using-potentially-fatal.html

3. I am leaving the analysis of Event 201 for others, at least for now. There was a great deal of "pandemic planning" that took place with US govt agencies as well as through the auspices of BMGF/JHU etc. over the past 2 decades. Perhaps this pandemic shows that applying old plans to an unprecedented situation may be worse than having no plans in place.

Unknown said...

99.9% of the western press is controlled by the famous FRJ mafia where F stay for free masons. R for Rotary and J for a few 100 exceptionally rich original Jews folks that e.g. bought 50% of Russland from Jelzin.

In Europe Rotary R/F did split the market where F controls Banking/building-construction as the normal mafia does too and R controls drugs/Pharma/Hospitals an insurances.
Currently they feel all mighty as most courts are controlled by majorities of F/R. In the US most members of Senate/Congress are also members of F/M. As NSA military is their (F) traditional US field too they do have free access to all world wide available data (AKAMAI)including all online PC,MAC,Google-OS etc. operated machines -thanks to the secrete part (company instructions)of the patriot act.
So why do we believe that the most degenerated people of the world would help us??

Rob2020 said...

I am Canadian and a high risk individual for COVID-19 (over 70 and deficiency of the immunity system). So far I asked 3 doctors to prescribe me HCQ + AZT to keep in reserve and use if I test positive for COVID-19. Three times I discussed intensively with them, twice I answered their challenging questions with references, and three times I was refused.

The first doctor, an intern, told me that HCQ and AZT cannot be combined, they are dangerous taken together. Eventually she referred me to the lead doctor. The lead doctor challenged me, reminding me that I was talking to a "physician". I was well prepared and provided a complete analysis of facts with references. You are point sharp she responded surprized, but Pr. Didier Raoult is controversial, therefore unreliable, Chinese hide their information and cannot be believed, no one uses HQC, Big Pharma is not involved in this pandemia and she would not use me as a guinea pig. End of the conversation.

The third doctor, a blood specialist, was more knowledgeable but refused to provided me with a potential life saving medication. He mentioned something about government instructions and the rarity of the medication.

It seems that Canadian doctors are either incompetent or lack the courage to treat their patients. Knowing the Canadian Government, I would not be surprized if Health Canada provided secret instructions to doctors preventing them to treat their patients.

My strategy is to avoid any grouping, reduce all non necessary contacts, and stay home, away from the city. How long will it be when the government and the health professionals finally assume their responsibilities? What does it take to force them to stop killing people?

Unknown said...

Doxycycline instead of AZT is even more powerful and has been shown to work fine. But Ivermectin Doxycycline is far better if you are in a later stage.
If you get first symptoms then you have two choices. Drink a lot of orange choice that contains Hesperidin or make an advanced order for quercetin. Add zinc vitamin D in case your are low.

For legal follow up actions: If you visit the doctor go with a witness that is not related with you. Prepare a paper (that describes what the doctors denies despite evidence you must hand out him too!) that you hand out the doctor after he denies you the medicament(s). Ask him to sign it. If he refuse it's enough that your witness signs it in a special section where the witness does testify what you did say etc...inform etc. the doctor and that the doctor did refuse to properly treat you according best known therapy.


Tim said...

Quercetin,a common nutrient found in healthfood stores, is a zinc ionophore-same as hydroxychloroquine. No need for hydroxychloroquine prescription.

Tim said...

Quercetin is better absorbed when taken with red wine according to one study. Be sure to take enough zinc, but not too much. Vitamin C, D and magnesium are also important.

Shoveller said...

Today, the UK government announced orders for 90 million vaccines from three manufacturers. This is on top of the 100 million already ordered from AstraZeneca for their version. That's 190 million for a total population of 68 million. Madness!
Also today, news of a small but very successful trial of Interferon B, administered by nebuliser (results have yet to be peer reviewed and followed up by a larger trial). With new infections falling n the UK, it may prove difficult to recruit enough patients.
Like HCQ, the results are great if administered early. My guess is that like HCQ, the UK "medical establishment" will find a way of creating a trial protocol that doesn't work to justify their ordering 190 million doses of unproven and potentially dangerous vaccines and sidelining another safe treatment.

Steveve said...

HCQ is only a carrier to the intracellular space. Zinc is what "kills" the virus. Ivermectin is also a carrier. Look into this

Rich said...

37. You omit any mention of strategies for strengthening the immune system. For example, you suppress the truth that there is a significant correlation between low serum vitamin D levels and mortality from Covid19. You don’t mention that vitamin D is inexpensive, recommended by the French National Academy of Medicine as an adjunct therapy, and reimbursed by French National Health Insurance.

38. You don’t bother to recommend that people avoid flu shots, which increase their risk of other upper respiratory infections.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccine-misinformation-flu-shots-equal-health/
https://www.infectiousdiseaseadvisor.com/home/topics/respiratory/influenza/increased-risk-for-acute-respiratory-illness-following-influenza-vaccine-in-children/

Drew458 said...

Rich,

I don't think flu shots are part of her discussion here, although they are pushed very hard by Big Medicine and many people find them questionable. Most people don't understand that the flu shot is a mitigation vaccine, not a preventative one. Will the COVID vaccine be the same way, or will it shut it down cold, the way the polio vaccine works? Time will tell, but I can't see the point in a mitigation one for a disease that 80% of the population doesn't even catch, and 80% of the people who do get it don't even know they have it, and the majority of those who do get it and are sick enough to know that get over it in a week or two on their own. Find a preventative vaccine, and inoculate those in the high risk groups. The rest of us can manage on our own, although the level of paranoia is so high at this point I'd expect riots at the doctors office when any vaccine becomes available. I'm not an anti-vaxxer, but I have deep suspicions about Bill Gates and the money men behind all this; I won't get the vaccine unless somebody is pointing a gun at my head.


Strategies for strengthening your immune system are also beyond the purview of this post. However, I completely agree with you that such a thing is a smart move. Many "merely anecdotal" observations have shown that the vast number of people who have died from this while having other, often multiple, co-morbidities have had very low levels of zinc, vitamin D, and vitamin C. Eating lots of grapefruit was shown to cure or prevent the Spanish flu, but was dismissed as quackery in an era when all kinds of snake oil claims were common.

Just the other day I read a post on several things you can do to cure, mitigate, or prevent this virus. Many of them are very similar to what was done during the 1918 flu, and others that were standard treatments against diseases like TB and polio in the days before antibiotics became ubiquitous. They work, but perhaps not as quickly.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/07/no_author/covid-19/

I gather you should take quite a lot more C than a single daily supplement, as the intravenous C is the most effective. Failing that, history shows that strong hourly dosages until you get diarrhea, then back off the levels, was the method used back then. That seems frighteningly excessive, but it worked.

~~~~


While I appreciate the depth of this post, this is not the first time the efforts to squelch HCQ have been documented. Watts Up With That did a nice one a while back, and has run other posts showing how the FDA's EUA to use HCQ only in hospital's clinical trials was an effort to Get Trump and to stop widespread use of a cheap medicine we have tens of millions of doses of, to give Big Pharma time to create something highly profitable. Deep State, MSM, Big Pharm are hand in hand complicit, while Raoult and Dr. Zelenko get canceled.

PKANJALI said...

This is exactly how the cabal/deep state work to maintain total control of the narrative and make sure we only hear what they want us to be-lie-ve! Thank you for compiling this record. You are amazing

kramefc said...

Please do not overlook other medications. See video for clarification.

This us for early intervention. Shouldn't have the same hurdles as HCQ.



Budesonide
Zinc
Chlorithromyacine


https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=eDSDdwN2Xcg

Frances Lilian Wellington said...

Excellent thorough overview! Thank You Meryl Nass (I admire your dedication!) Thank you commentary contributors. MUCH appreciated!

I have one question to pose to EVERYONE here: In the lead up to this year, I optimised my nutrition (data tracked using Chronometer) using stretch targets (for the 39 essential nutrients) to target 100% immunity support. I then contracted this new virus (only symptom was distinctly high lethargy for 1.5 weeks) as my well resourced immune system defended my body beautifully. Bounced back. My question is... "Is any one using this same PREVENTATIVE method in a group setting to collect the research data?"

I welcome ANY leads/links, feedback. Cheers!

Miss Frances Lilian Wellington (retired ICPKP Kinesiologist, Brisbane Australia).

www.healthytidbits.blogspot.com said...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/ FAUCI AND THE NIH KNEW IN 2005 WHEN THEY PAID FOR A STUDY ON HCQ FOR SARS-COV. IT WAS AN EFFECTIVE TREATMENT. FAUCI SEEMED TO FORGET ABOUT THIS STUDY.
WHEN ARE GATES AND FAUCI, THE CDC AND FDA GOING TO BE ARRESTED FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY?
.

AdilRajaa said...

Canadian Government is also being sued. See link below:

https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/wp-content/uploads/vcc-statement-of-claim-2020-redacted.pdf

Bert Boersma said...

Everytime you see new confirmations about the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine ( antimalaria medicine ). In specific malaria countries like Nigeria, Ethiopia,Mozambique,Niger,Congo,Ivory Coast you see the number of deaths per million inhabitants vary between 0.5 and 4.5 deaths per million In western countries you see the number of corona deaths per million inhabitants between 350 ( Holland ) and 850 deaths ( Belgium ) per million inhabitants.
People in malaria countries and travelers to that countries preventative protect themselves against corona. When you look at the hygiene in that countries you would expect the opposite. If people in malaria countries would boost their immune system with zinc,vitamin C and vitamin D the corona death toll would even further decrease to zero deaths.

Unknown said...

Wow. Ever hear of 'punctuation'? Lol

Unknown said...

At one point, before Covid arrived, Fauci stated 'The current administration 'Will face a surprise infectious disease outbreak'.

Unknown said...

iT IS CLEAR THAT OUR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IS CORRUPT! I BELIEVE IT STARTED WITH FAUCI AND GATES AND SPREAD FROM THERE. FOLLOW THE MONEY AND WE WILL SEE. THE BOTTOM LINE IS THIS IS A THREAT TO OUR WELL BEING, EVEN TO OUR VERY LIVES! iT IS AN ATROCITY TO INTERFERE WITH DOCTOR PATIENT RELATIONSHIPS, AND TO FORCE MEDICINE ON ANY HUMAN BEING BY THOSE WHO ARE RICH AND HAVE THE MONEY TO INFLUENCE ORGANIZATIONS. IT IS JUST IMMORAL AND A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY AND IT IS OBVIOUS THAT WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, ESPECIALLY IF THIS COMPLAINT TO CONGRESS DOES NOT CHANGE SOMETHING! we cannot stand by and risk our health and our lives!

Unknown said...

This article exposes a monstrously criminal conspiracy, for financial gain, to deny the use of a cheap, readily available, commonly known drug (hydroxychloroquine) to save the lives of covid-19 infected patients both in the United States and internationally. The scope of the criminality involved, for the enrichment of a few greedy individuals and corporations, is staggering in the numbers of deaths that were both intentionally caused and which were, at the same time, the means to the desired end. The end desired result is the dependence of the entire world on the manufacturers of a vaccine for covid-19 and the billions the world would pay for a dose for everyone. Of course, it is required that the whole world is convinced that there is no acceptable therapy or cure for the virus. How many have died to satisfy the greed behind this?

Dave Ratcliffe said...

Inside No. 12 (above), along with the embedded link for "reports from many different countries" (which goes to https://c19study.com), a complement, regularly updated site to study and draw supportive data from is:

Early treatment with hydroxychloroquine: a country-based analysis
https://hcqtrial.com/

with the current - as of 8 September - summary stating:

Many countries either adopted or declined early treatment with HCQ, effectively forming a large trial with 1.8 billion people in the treatment group and 663 million in the control group. As of September 8, 2020, an average of 59.0 per million in the treatment group have died, and 465.5 per million in the control group, relative risk 0.127. After adjustments, treatment and control deaths become 123.1 per million and 691.7 per million, relative risk 0.18. The probability of an equal or lower relative risk occurring from random group assignments is 0.010. Accounting for predicted changes in spread, we estimate a relative risk of 0.24. The treatment group has a 75.8% lower death rate. Confounding factors affect this estimate. We examined diabetes, obesity, hypertension, life expectancy, population density, urbanization, testing level, and intervention level, which do not account for the effect observed.

An expanding list of sources is being archived here:
https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/index.html#EfficacyHCQ