Please don't roll over and hurt yourself. Go to a clinic where the Pfizer vaccine is offered. If it does not say Comirnaty on the label, it is EXPERIMENTAL according to US law and you don't have to take it. Take a photo of the vaccine you are being offered and make sure there is a date stamp. This is evidence you can use to dispute the mandate.
I understand you may lose your job. I understand the enormous pressure being placed on people to risk their health for their job. I too may lose my practice.
But if we all refuse, we will win this. If we cave in, we will lose it.
Here Ron Johnson explains the bait and switch pulled on us by the FDA. (You heard about it here first.)
https://www.foxnews.com/media/ron-johnson-no-fda-approved-covid-vaccine
12 comments:
The link to fox news does not work--I get an "access denied" message.
San Jose in California just backed down on firing its government employees if they don't take the shot - people are punished with one week of unpaid leave and have to purchase twice-a-week COVID tests. They said losing so many employees would be detrimental to operations.
Also, I saw an article this week in the San Francisco paper that had public health officials admitting the vaccination rates aren't as high as what they have been reporting. They say they always knew this. It's because the 'denominator', meaning population, was too low. If you use a better (higher) estimate of population, the vaxx rate goes down.
More people than one might expect are avoiding these shots, and governments/businesses will sometimes back down.
Here are 2 links that explain WHAT is really going on (it has nothing to do with public health):
Catherine Austin Fitts video (14 minutes):
https://www.brighteon.com/d70c8f5c-822d-48bb-bd3e-4fdd9008ed5b
https://tessa.substack.com/p/ernst-wolff-digital-financial-complex
Apologies for the length, some readers may find this useful. On September 1st I sent the following email to the school district superintendent where I work in Oregon:
===
In your email to all staff yesterday (August 31, subject "A few updates"), you have included a section on "Vaccinations". This section includes a list of available products and dates by which they "must be taken" (emphasis added).
Please note, however, that none of the products you have listed has received full FDA approval at this time. Rather, all of the products you have listed are available under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) regulations only.
In its announcement of August 23, 2021, the FDA approval pertains only to a single product, to be manufactured by Pfizer under the brand name "COMIRNATY". Meanwhile, the existing supplies of Pfizer product not labeled as COMIRNATY are continued under EUA only. (Note also that neither the Moderna nor Johnson & Johnson products were subject to any FDA approval announcement and so continue to be distributed as EUA only, not fully approved.)
Because the COMIRNATY labeled product is not yet in distribution means this: there are no fully licensed products available for district employees at this time.
The FDA's licensure documentation describes the COMIRNATY labeled product as "legally distinct" from the existing Pfizer product. The importance of this distinction is crucial as it relates to product/manufacturer liability and consumer injury. Under the EUA authorization, companies have been granted full indemnification for these products, as those who choose to use them are presumed to do so voluntarily and are fully cognizant of the associated risks. That indemnification disappears with the fully licensed version.
What does this mean in practice, where we stand as of today?
It means that, by the wording of your email yesterday, the district is evidently requiring employees to accept products that are not approved by the FDA, while still being evaluated experimentally under their EUA usage.
The FDA's own "Fact Sheet for Recipients", dated August 23rd, make it abundantly clear that usage of such products cannot be mandated under EUA (see page 6):
WHAT IF I DECIDE NOT TO GET COMIRNATY (COVID-19 VACCINE, mRNA) OR THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE? Under the EUA, it is your choice to receive or not receive the vaccine.
Reference: https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
This puts the district in the legally precarious position of compelling employees to participate as experimental subjects as a condition of continued employment. An abundance of precedence and case law in this area exists, and such coercion is clearly illegal.
Though I am not a lawyer, I would suspect that a governor's edict does not relieve the district from abiding by federal law in this area. The district could certainly be held directly liable from both sides of the equation. That is, liability for any district employees who were injured by the EUA products, and liability for any district employees who declined coercion and were subsequently terminated. I suspect a defense of "but we were only following orders" would be highly problematic in both cases.
My personal suggestion would be to: 1) step back from any language that may be understood as coercion in your communications with employees; 2) retain independent legal counsel to fully review the scope of complex legal liabilities in this matter; 3) protect the district and its employees by pushing back against the state's problematic and premature mandate; 4) do not rush.
Thank you for your concern during these challenging times.
===
Although no response has been received at this date -- and none is expected -- such a notification may be useful documentation in the future.
The deadline for submitting to the coercion in our state is October 18.
FYI:
Study: COVID-19 Vaccines INCREASE Deaths and Hospitalizations from COVID-19 Based on Analysis of Most-Vaccinated Countries
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/study-covid-19-vaccines-increase-deaths-and-hospitalizations-from-covid-19-based-on-analysis-of-most-vaccinated-countries/
BOOM! Sen. Ron Johnson Drops Truth-Bomb on Senate Floor – 63% of UK Delta Deaths in Last 7.5 Months Were Fully Vaccinated (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/boom-sen-ron-johnson-drops-truth-bomb-senate-floor-63-uk-delta-deaths-last-7-5-months-fully-vaccinated-video/
Twitter Suppressed This, Fauci's Daughter Works For Twitter.
Jessica Berg Wilson
Oct. 29, 1983 - Sept. 7, 2021
Jessica Berg Wilson, 37, of Seattle, Wash., passed away unexpectedly Sept. 7, 2021 from COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT) surrounded by her loving family. Jessica was an exceptionally healthy and vibrant 37-year-old young mother with no underlying health conditions.
https://obits.oregonlive.com/us/obituaries/oregon/name/jessica-wilson-obituary?pid=200278331
So is Jessica Berg Wilson the daughter of Fauci??
J&J Covid Shot Linked To Deadly Blood Clotting
www . dailymail . co . uk/news/article-10049375/EU-finds-J-J-COVID-shot-possibly-linked-rare-clotting-condition.html
-First they came for the nurses jobs, and I did not speak out because I wasn’t a nurse.
-Than they came for the state workers jobs, and I did not speak out because I wasn’t a state worker.
-Than they came for the federal workers jobs, and I did not speak out because I wasn’t a federal worker.
-Than they came for your job, and i did not speak out because it wasn’t my job.
-Than they came for my job…and everyone who chose not to speak out like me, now share the same fate…
Anastasia Romanov
https://www.biography.com/royalty/anastasia-romanov
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/george-mikhailovich-romanov-victoria-romanovna-bettarini-royal-wedding-russia/
A Romanov return: Royal wedding in Russia after more than 100 years
Updated on: October 2, 2021 / 9:18 PM
http://petermyersnewsletters.blogspot.com/2020/06/1191-barry-kissin-refutes-larry.html
KEVIN BARRETT
APRIL 12, 2020
Barry Kissin is an attorney who lives near the Ft. Detrick biowar
facility where the 2001 false flag anthrax was made. He is an expert on
the anthrax aspect of the 9/11-anthrax false flag, and is knowledgable
and deeply concerned about our desperate need to ban biological weapons
while there is still time. But he is not convinced by Larry Romanoff’s
arguments that COVID-19 is a US bioweapon. He isn’t even sure about
Meryl Nass’s refutation of the "can’t be a bioweapon" propaganda push.
What’s more, he argues that we shouldn’t be highlighting the "it looks
like a bioweapon" argument!
I disagree. Given the abundance of circumstantial evidence, the leading
(neocon) suspects’ prior record (including the 2001 anthrax attack) and
the strong means-motive-opportunity argument, I think we should be
screaming "COVID 19 is probably a bioweapon" from the rooftops. So why
am I wrong? Let’s ask Barry!
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/04/10/kissin-Romanoff/
Anthrax False Flag Expert Barry Kissin: "Romanoff’s Version of COVID-19
Conspiracy Doesn’t Hold Up"
By Kevin Barrett -April 10, 2020134325
Senior Editor’s note: This article and other work of Barry Kissin, seen
as ‘controlled opposition’ and without substance, would normally have
been rejected by VT except for the intercession of Kevin Barrett.
Otherwise it would be deemed "spam."
Barry Kissin discusses this article on tonight’s live radio show. -Kevin
Barrett, Veterans Today Editor
Romanoff’s Version of COVID-19 Conspiracy Doesn’t Hold Up
By Barry Kissin (this article was rejected by GlobalResearch.ca)
On March 12, Zhao Lijian, deputy director of and spokesperson for
China’s Foreign Ministry Information Department, issued two tweets, the
first providing a link to Global Research’s publication on March 4 of
Larry Romanoff’s "China’s Coronavirus: A Shocking Update. Did The Virus
Originate in the US?"[1] and the second providing a link to Global
Research’s publication on March 11 of Larry Romanoff’s "COVID-19:
Further Evidence that the Virus Originated in the US."[2]Zhao says that
these articles "changed many things I used to believe in" and should be
read and retweeted.
On the same day, March 12, The Hill reported that "a spokesman for the
Chinese government [Zhao Lijian] on Thursday promoted a conspiracy
theory that the coronavirus was brought to the city of Wuhan by the U.S.
military. Taiwan News reported: "Coincidentally, Zhao’s fellow foreign
ministry spokesman Geng Shuang backed the conspiracy theory suggesting
the virus was bio-engineered by the [U.S.]." On March 13, the New York
Times published about Zhao Lijian’s tweets in an article subtitled
"After criticizing American officials for politicizing the pandemic,
Chinese officials and news outlets have floated unfounded theories that
the United States was the source of the virus." [3]
Fauci Daughter works for Twitter.
Twitter Suppressed J. Wilson Vaccine Obit, which was posted on Twitter, Twitter removed it, or added their own Spin to the Obit story.
Received an "access denied" message on the fox link.
Post a Comment