Here is a 15 second clip of Rochelle Walensky talking to Wolf Blitzer:
She lies in the same sentence, claiming the vaccines still work "exceptionally well."
If they don't prevent transmission, you CANNOT USE PUBLIC HEALTH AND HERD IMMUNITY AS THE JUSTIFICATION FOR A MANDATE. At best, the vaccines might provide the recipient with some protection for a few months. But the downside is they might increase susceptibility or severity of disease later.
And when you add on the known and unknown short and long-term side effects, vaccination with an experimental product that went through minimal testing and poorly designed clinical trials just doesn't make sense.
All the bluster about mandates was designed to trick the public into getting vaccinated before the truth came out. Now it's out. Help your friends and family avoid these shots.
Remember: Your vaccine does NOT protect me, and it might not protect you either. Not for long. Then it might make things worse for you.
10 comments:
Informed Consent in the Military: The Anthrax Vaccination Case:
The legal doctrine of informed consent stems primarily from the right to protect the sanctity of one's body from the intrusion of others. It means that patients must be told of risks and benefits of medical treatment and must give their consent prior to receiving treatment. Recourse to the courts when informed consent procedures are not followed.
https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/informed-consent-military-anthrax-vaccination-case/2007-10
How can their be any Vaccine Mandates or Passports?
'There It Is… CDC Director Tells CNN the COVID Vaccines Can’t Prevent Transmission'
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/cdc-director-tells-cnn-covid-vaccines-cant-prevent-transmission-video/
How can their be any 'Vaccine Mandates? or Passports'?
'There It Is… CDC Director Tells CNN the COVID Vaccines "Can’t Prevent" Transmission'!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/cdc-director-tells-cnn-covid-vaccines-cant-prevent-transmission-video/
Like Ivermectin/Hydroxy will they Censor this?
'UK Researchers: Cholesterol Drug Reduces Covid-19 Infection by 70%'
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/uk-researchers-cholesterol-drug-reduces-covid-19-infection-70/
The CDC Director: “Our vaccines are working exceptionally well! They continue to work well for Delta with regard to severe illness and death, they prevent it. But what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.”
"They continue to work well for Delta with regard to severe illness and death" she said --- but what does the data say?
Don't expect CDC director to level with the American people on this essential matter. Expect more tears and flapdoodle from her; it's how she runs.
To date, I am able to locate CDC published information that says Delta is highly transmissible; and unable to locate CDC information demonstrating this variant cause "severe illness and death" -- the CDC's most recent information from an Aug. 6 published study [including VE/Vaccine Effectivness]:
"Finally, differences in vaccination coverage in some of these populations might be an additional confounding factor when estimating crude VE at the county and state levels. VE studies with more rigorous methods and the power to estimate protection against severe outcomes are needed to better understand the potential impact of the Delta variant."
Obvious question: how does "VE studies with more rigorous methods and the power to estimate protection against severe outcomes are needed to better understand the potential impact of the Delta variant"
Square with: the covid shots "continue to work well for Delta with regard to severe illness and death".
Walensky made this claim on national TV --- fully aware her own agency's most recent information is actually stating that "VE studies with more rigorous methods and the power to estimate protection against severe outcomes are needed to better understand the potential impact of the Delta variant."
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7032e2.htm?s_cid=mm7032e2_w
Another paper says the Delta "B.1.617.2 variant is highly transmissible in indoor sports settings and households, which might lead to increased attack rates."
This paper, last updated July 16 by CDC, says in conclusion: "Finally, vaccine effectiveness could not be calculated because of an inability to interview all persons associated with the outbreak and incomplete state immunization registry data."
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7028e2.htm
VE is supposed to be determined after the fact.
This means after a year, a season, of comprehensive data collection -- in which, say: how well, for example, did vax ABC perform against this or that influenza? -- after the fact, after flu season ends.
Now, how well are covid shots VE doing? At this time, the answer is blowin' in the wind. . . .
PS
Earlier this week, Larry Sanger published an easy to read, short essay, "The Astonishing Hubris of a Global Experimental Vaccine".
https://larrysanger.org/2021/08/the-astonishing-hubris-of-a-global-experimental-vaccine/
-30-
CDC Does Not Mandate Covid-19 Vaccine For Employees!
https://rumble.com/vktt26-cdc-does-not-mandate-covid-19-vaccine-for-employees.html
How can any of these Vax be fully approved by the FDA?
Moderna and Pfizer Intentionally Lost the Clinical Trial Control Group Testing Efficacy and Safety!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/moderna-pfizer-intentionally-lost-clinical-trial-control-group-testing-efficacy-safety/
If they don't prevent transmission, you CANNOT USE PUBLIC HEALTH AND HERD IMMUNITY AS THE JUSTIFICATION FOR A MANDATE. At best, the vaccines might provide the recipient with some protection for a few months.
You can't justify a mandate also if the vax doesn't immunize or prevent infection. I guess that will be her next interview when all the data from Israel leaks out. By definition this is NOT a vaccine. Actually from all the breakthrough cases, this is turning out not to be a treatment. Even the pharma trolls online are having trouble spinning this.
I still think all talk of ADE and "breakthrough infections" is a distraction. More likely, people are simply dying from the shots and it's being covered up by blaming it on COVID-19 instead.
Many are aware the PCR test is invalid when it’s run over 35 cycles. But the test is also invalid even when run at low cycles. The SARS-COV-2 virus is supposedly 30,000 “letters” (nucleotides) long. Guess what- the PCR test only checks ~50 of those letters for a match! How can anyone claim that only checking for 0.17% of the virus is enough to determine you’re infected with that virus, especially when they also claim the SARS-COV-2 coronavirus is ~80% similar to other coronaviruses, which only cause a mild cold?!
Virologists claim the world is teeming with trillions of viruses which are everywhere- in the oceans, ground and atmosphere. Only a tiny fraction of these viruses have been sequenced. So how can only checking for 0.17% of a virus be enough to uniquely identify it? The answer is- IT CAN’T! So all talk of “cases” and “variants” and even “COVID deaths”, which are all based on the PCR test is NONSENSE!
The REAL purpose of PCR is to manufacture a given strand of DNA. Primers at the beginning and end of the strand identify which segment will be replicated. Step 4 of this link show two typical COVID-19 primers, which are only 22+26=48 letters out of 30,000 letters! https://www.otago.ac.nz/biochemistry/research/otago736925.html
Wikipedia shows the 8 steps of a PCR cycle and how the DNA strand is doubled (2,4,8,16 etc.) with every cycle. A PCR test is “positive” if enough DNA, which matches the primers, is manufactured to be detected by the time the set number of cycles is completed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction
Kary Mullis, who invented PCR and won the 1993 Nobel Prize for it, repeatedly said the PCR test can’t be used to determine a viral infection. He also said Fauci is a “liar and a fraud” (due to Fauci’s role in the HIV=AIDS scamdemic) long before the rest of us learned this the hard way.
https://off-guardian.org/2021/08/03/repeat-after-me-the-pcr-tests-dont-work/
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/
I believe the way she is phrasing it, is that they were effective in preventing infection and transmission, but no longer after 6 months, laying the ground work for a bi-annual booster shot, along w/ I expect, more mandating of influenza vax, and many more (Fauci plans for vaccines for 10 virus families in the next five years).
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/25/health/fauci-prototype-vaccines.html
"I still think all talk of ADE and "breakthrough infections" is a distraction. More likely, people are simply dying from the shots and it's being covered up by blaming it on COVID-19 instead."
This is BS. It does not explain the large drop in deaths as vaccines have been implemented. If the vaccines were responsible, deaths would be growing, not declining.
Post a Comment