For people who still think that public health dictates are intended for our benefit, will you still think so when the public health police decide to remove granny from her home to a high risk camp, where latrines will be provided? And hopefully food and medical care, all based on the refugee model? This was updated a year ago, so it has probably changed in the interim.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data. Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available. Please check the CDC website periodically for updates.
What is the Shielding Approach1?
The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.1,2 They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.
Operational Considerations
The shielding approach requires several prerequisites for effective implementation. Several are addressed, including access to healthcare and provision of food. However, there are several prerequisites which require additional considerations. Table 2 presents the prerequisites or suggestions as stated in the shielding guidance document (column 1) and CDC presents additional questions and considerations alongside these prerequisites (column 2).
Table 2: Suggested Prerequisites per the shielding documents and CDC’s Operational Considerations for Implementation
Suggested Prerequisites
*As stated in the shielding document*
Considerations as suggested by CDC
- Each green zone has a dedicated latrine/bathing facility for high-risk individuals
- The shielding approach advises against any new facility construction to establish green zones; however, few settings will have existing shelters or communal facilities with designated latrines/bathing facilities to accommodate high-risk individuals. In these settings, most latrines used by HHs are located outside the home and often shared by multiple HHs.
- If dedicated facilities are available, ensure safety measures such as proper lighting, handwashing/hygiene infrastructure, maintenance and disinfection of latrines.
- Ensure facilities can accommodate high-risk individuals with disabilities, children and separate genders at the neighborhood/camp-level.
- To minimize external contact, each green zone should include able-bodied high-risk individuals capable of caring for residents who have disabilities or are less mobile. Otherwise, designate low-risk individuals for these tasks, preferably who have recovered from confirmed COVID-19 and are assumed to be immune.
- This may be difficult to sustain, especially if the caregivers are also high risk. As caregivers may often will be family members, ensure that this strategy is socially or culturally acceptable.
- Currently, we do not know if prior infection confers immunity.
- The green zone and living areas for high-risk residents should be aligned with minimum humanitarian (SPHERE) standards.6
- The shielding approach requires strict adherence to infection, prevention and control (IPC) measures. They require, uninterrupted availability of soap, water, hygiene/cleaning supplies, masks or cloth face coverings, etc. for all individuals in green zones. Thus, it is necessary to ensure minimum public health standards6 are maintained and possibly supplemented to decrease the risk of other outbreaks outside of COVID-19. Attaining and maintaining minimum SPHERE6 standards is difficult in these settings for the general population.8,9,10 Users should consider that provision of services and supplies to high risk individuals could be at the expense of low-risk residents, putting them at increased risk for other outbreaks.
ReplyDeleteWE ARE JUST ROAD KILL TO THESE PEOPLE!
It was the DEMS which put American Japaneese in Concent Camps.WWII
Anyone who would do this to Dogs is a Piece of Crap!
So I would'nt put anything past them!
"Despicable: FOIA Reveals Fauci & NIAID Spent Over $400K Infecting Dogs with 'Painful' and 'Deadly Parasites' in 'UNNECESSARY' Experiments"!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/despicable-foia-reveals-fauci-niaid-spent-400k-infecting-dogs-painful-deadly-parasites-unnecessary-experiments/
This is bizarre when you consider that this disease is treatable with safe, inexpensive medication. I mean, REALLY bizarre.
ReplyDeleteWhat's really going on here?
ReplyDelete"He's A Pathological Liar": Cornell Chemistry Professor Dave Collum Unloads On Dr. Fauci And Covid Hysteria!
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/hes-pathological-liar-cornell-chemistry-professor-dave-collum-destroys-dr-fauci-lockdowns
'Elites Worried: COVID Cases in India Plummet After Government Promotes' Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine Use!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/elites-worried-covid-cases-india-plummet-government-promotes-ivermectin-hydroxychloroquine-use/
Pierre Kory is reporting that the MATH+ protocol is not working very well in hospitalized patients with Delta. Docs are distressed. I know you said recently that delta is less severe but it doesn't seem so from what those on frontlines are saying. It seems to get serious fast. For myself, I'm going to make myself treat aggressively even at a slight sore throat.
ReplyDeleteWow! 'Neighbors “swap” households to accommodate high-risk individuals.' So much for private property rights. Maybe some people have unstable neighbours they don't want to live with.
ReplyDeleteCDC needs its wings clipped, as do the NIH and FDA.
Oh, they forgot something - besides the "uninterrupted availability" of soap, water, cleaning supplies that are probably toxic, having some early treatments on hand might be a good idea .. Glad the drug companies are hard at work on discovering what those might be!
ReplyDelete
ReplyDelete'INTERESTING'???
Glutathione and COVID-19: Very Preliminary Evidence!
https://chrismasterjohnphd.com/covid-19/glutathione-and-covid-19-very-preliminary-evidence
New York mom with coronavirus saved by medical-student son’s quick thinking!
https://nypost.com/2020/05/09/new-york-mom-with-coronavirus-saved-by-medical-student-son/
Dr. Richard Horowitz (Lyme researcher/clinician) has been treating Covid with Glutathione + other supportive supplements + Ivermectin since April 2020. This is old news, but no one listens. He tried for months to get an IVM + glutathione trial funded, no luck. Mary Beth Pfeiffer has reported on this in Trial Site News and some info is available on his website: https://cangetbetter.com/covid/
ReplyDelete