tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6592607595936297457.post5286866999169683664..comments2024-03-27T05:14:13.995-04:00Comments on Anthrax Vaccine -- posts by Meryl Nass, M.D.: COVID-19 deaths, hospitalizations, cases, % positive tests fall nationwide : 10 CDC findingsMeryl Nass, M.D.http://www.blogger.com/profile/07001997291638442225noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6592607595936297457.post-90757418773952213462022-02-19T19:12:45.980-05:002022-02-19T19:12:45.980-05:00This is from the statement of work by the US Army ...This is from the statement of work by the US Army on July 21, 2020:<br /><br />https://imgur.com/a/ra3VcDg<br /><br />Notice everything is blacked out except for "prevention of Covid-19" (which it doesn't do).<br /><br />All this HIV talk makes me nervous because Fauci's first instinct in the 80s was to find a vaccine for it, and I doubt he's given up on that.<br /><br />Anyway, during the trials an old friend of Fauci's (spontaneously?) sent a letter to Francis Collins demanding that HIV-positive people be included in the Phase 2/3 trials. Here is the letter writer and Fauci together:<br /><br />https://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/03/29/aids-action-baltimore-celebrates-25-years/<br /><br />and the letter:<br /><br />http://www.aidsactionbaltimore.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/COVID-19-1273-Letter-to-Dr.-Collins-Director-of-the-NIH.pdf<br /><br />They went ahead and added HIV+ patients. This seems reckless to me - couldn't that throw off the results, either by medication they are on or HIV itself? Why would they do this, because earlier they explicitly ruled out HIV+ people?<br /><br />Maybe the answer is in the blacked-out portions of the Statement of Work.David Barneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14627176601218831020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6592607595936297457.post-77242768760098744792022-02-19T11:31:04.911-05:002022-02-19T11:31:04.911-05:00Looking at the reports on that page, one of them t...Looking at the reports on that page, one of them talks about the waning "effectiveness" of the shots.<br /><br />"The finding that protection conferred by mRNA vaccines waned in the months after receipt of a third vaccine dose reinforces the importance of further consideration of additional doses"<br /><br />https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7107e2.htm?s_cid=mm7107e2_w<br /><br />Sounds to me like they are laying groundwork to move forward with four injections.David Barneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14627176601218831020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6592607595936297457.post-23427238145105993772022-02-19T11:28:54.701-05:002022-02-19T11:28:54.701-05:00I am not ready to comment on graphene oxide. I wi...I am not ready to comment on graphene oxide. I will say that I am not sure that what is supposed to be in the vaccines, according ot their labels, are exactly what is in the vaccines.<br /><br />The fact that no licensed product is being made available in the US--which has to meet a much higher standard than "may be effective" and presuably benefits exceed risks--should scare everyone.Meryl Nass, M.D.https://www.blogger.com/profile/07001997291638442225noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6592607595936297457.post-53369578788770328452022-02-19T10:44:56.258-05:002022-02-19T10:44:56.258-05:00"Official U.K. Lab Report confirms Covid-19 V...<br />"Official U.K. Lab Report confirms Covid-19 Vaccines definitely contain Graphene Oxide"<br /><br />The Covid-19 vaccines have been 'forensically examined' in the 'United Kingdom' and a laboratory report confirms they contain graphene nanomaterials that can penetrate the body’s natural barriers and 'damage the central nervous system', and Graphene Oxide which 'can damage internal organs, destroy blood health, trigger cancer, and cause changes in gene function among a host of other ill effects'.<br /><br />https://tapnewswire.com/2022/02/official-u-k-lab-report-confirms-covid-19-vaccines-definitely-contain-graphene-oxide/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com