tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6592607595936297457.post4008464072103998085..comments2024-03-27T05:14:13.995-04:00Comments on Anthrax Vaccine -- posts by Meryl Nass, M.D.: Science in anthrax letter case comes under attack/ Sacramento BeeMeryl Nass, M.D.http://www.blogger.com/profile/07001997291638442225noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6592607595936297457.post-74974943917369482082011-10-16T19:58:50.383-04:002011-10-16T19:58:50.383-04:00Willman also mistakenly states that the paper clai...Willman also mistakenly states that the paper claimed Joe Michael at Sandia "hid" his finding of tin in the spores for years. The paper clearly discusses Sandia's QUALITATIVE finding of tin.<br /><br />What was hidden by the FBI for years was the QUANTITATIVE finding of tin - 0.65%. There is more tin than can possibly be explained as a "lab contaminant".<br /><br />There is more tin present than other metals that are deliberately added during spore production. So much for it being a contaminant.<br /><br />Since the FBI (and seemingly Willman as their sock puppet) wish to continue with the absurd notion that the tin is an accident, it is not surprising they don't mention numbers like 0.65%. Because you can write "0.65%" and "contaminant" in the same sentence with a straight face.<br /><br />The full paper can be downloaded free here:<br /><br />http://www.omicsonline.org/ArchiveJBTBD/ArticleinpressJBTBD.php<br />Review Article J Bioterr Biodef 2011, S3-001 <br />doi: 10.4172/2157-2526.S3-001<br />The 2001 Attack Anthrax: Key ObservationsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com