tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6592607595936297457.post3514617424363246630..comments2024-03-27T05:14:13.995-04:00Comments on Anthrax Vaccine -- posts by Meryl Nass, M.D.: Pediatric Covid death numbers: can vaccinations of children be justified?Meryl Nass, M.D.http://www.blogger.com/profile/07001997291638442225noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6592607595936297457.post-62968121076737674862021-07-15T22:09:06.586-04:002021-07-15T22:09:06.586-04:00i totally agree. the 'newspaper of record'...i totally agree. the 'newspaper of record' is a crying, lying shame. lies by omission and commission, both. lynnbradhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07213984294825279438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6592607595936297457.post-39528742000658882922021-07-15T12:59:37.708-04:002021-07-15T12:59:37.708-04:00One Lies and the next one swears by it
Thank you ...One Lies and the next one swears by it<br /><br />Thank you for sharing this essay and reference to AAP paper.<br /><br />The AAP, and data, and the 50 Shades of Gray – i.e., various state departments of public health.<br /><br />And local/municipal health departments and health directors.<br /><br />I have much first hand experience dealing with the shades of gray and local public health departments.<br /><br />Whatever their skill-set might be: expertise in the science of data is NOT one of them.<br /><br />Whether designed or by default, a big huge hole -- in our public health system, at local, state and national level, is gross ignorance, in a systemic way, on adequate knowledge viz. the science of data.<br /><br />This also the case in all of big media, and the lords and masters sitting in congress and white house and their underlings/civil servants.<br /><br />To say every US medical doctor should at lest possess a masters degree in applied mathematical stats, and preferably Ph.D. is not asking too much.<br /><br />What is definitely not asking too much goes for epidemiologists.<br /><br />How many epidemiologist even at Ph.D level actually, in the US, actually possess separate training in the science of data? <br /><br />Given the data disasters of past 18 months, it should be required for all epis to have earned at least MS and preferably, Ph.D in applied mathematical statistics.<br /><br />This is not to say epis are not trained in stats and how to program, say in R, or SAS, or STATA, etc.<br /><br />This is to say that they absolutely, as a group, all of them taken together, as a profession: lack expert knowledge in the science of data. <br /><br />This is not required to become epi. It’s long past time this should be a requirement.<br /><br />Yes, some epis and MDs possess this essential knowledge and skills; but far too few in USA.<br /><br />This gap has resulted in disastrous and many-faceted and horrendous and deadly [yet easily preventable] consequences on many levels.<br /><br />Existence of this gap rationally and directly explain: why so much information that is useful and in the public interest -- is instead being done by those actual scientists and MDs and epis being censored and banned and deplatformed, etc.<br /><br />There is so much actual science challenging the “narratives” pushed by CDC, NIH, military, big media. . . precisely because those pushing these narratives – to sound crude, operate as follows: One Lies, and The Next One Swears By It.<br /><br />They get away with it because the public is denied explanations by those skilled in the science of data.<br /><br />Those being silenced are the ones willing and able to challenge the perfidy precisely because they have not abandoned the scientific method. And they are skilled in the science of data.<br /><br />Were the NYTimes et al. not such peddlars of so many false narratives, they would realize this obvious gap, and how, because of this gaping hole, so many of the silenced are doing the actual work in the public interest.<br /><br />And in this realization, our “paper of record” et al. would have a wonderful story to write about.<br /><br />Of course, were our big media not so heinous, they would have been writing about this story at least since Feb. 2020.<br /><br />Of course, had they been doing that, they would have discovered along the way: the cholorquines and ivermectin; and there would have been no pandemic, and no EUAs and no deadly and harmful ‘vaccines.’<br /><br />And certainly vaxxing youngsters would not even be up for discussion, much less vax 'passports' and the litany of police state terror tactics pushed by "liberals" who don't yet realize they are fascist.<br /><br />And were big media doing this. . . just might have hell of a lot more information, essential data, in the public domain for all.<br /><br />Instead there's mass confusion. <br /><br />A leading contributor is a willful effort to mask and obfuscate: <br />1] the actual data<br />2] and how to interpret this<br /><br />The mass confusion is on purpose, since clarity is not or would not be so hard to arrive at.<br /><br />-30-<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6592607595936297457.post-21253460219774669812021-07-15T01:47:19.604-04:002021-07-15T01:47:19.604-04:00
THEY DID GAIN OF FUNCTION, FOLKS!!
PAGE 1014:
***...<br />THEY DID GAIN OF FUNCTION, FOLKS!!<br />PAGE 1014:<br />****UNREDACTED*******<br />Coronavirus-spike-processing host proteases may include proprotein convertases from the virus-producing cells (e.g. furin), proteases from the extracellular environment (e.g. elastase), proteases on the cell surface of virus-targeted cells (e.g. TMPRSS2), and proteases in the endosomes of virus-targeted cells (e.g. cathepsins) (The SARS2 CoV also encodes a novel furin cleavage site, whose function in replication and pathogenesis is studied in Aim 2 and 3)<br /><br />We previously identified different protease activities as an important determinant for CoV host range and tissue specificity Therefore,comparative study of the cell entry of SARS2, SARS-CoV, and SARS2 like bat CoV RaTG1<br />Lk: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Fang-Li-emails.pdf<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com