On July 6th, 2022, the court of Florence has approved
a sentence annulling the measure taken by the Order of Psychologists of
Tuscany against one of its members, the reason being: ‘the suspension
of the exercise of the profession risks compromising primary individual
rights such as the right to a livelihood and the right to work’.
The judge ruled that the psychologist doesn’t need to be vaccinated in order to do his job by establishing that:
- these substances don’t prevent infection and transmission. Therefore, in front of the Italian law, there can not be an obligation.
- She also recognises that these substances provokes severe adverse events.
Therefore, it even less legitimate to force anybody to be injected. - The judge put the
dignity of the human being at the centre and referred twice to the
period of Nazism and Fascism. Mandatory vaccination is possible if there
is informed consent. For Covid injections, she explained that an
informed consent is not possible as we don’t know the ingredients and
the mechanisms of these substances because of industrial and alleged
military secret.
This interim decision is grounded in serious conclusion:
there is no right to suspend a citizen from the right to work based of
this illegal request of vaccination with these experimental substances.
With this historic court decision, “the Risk to human genome is now
legally established” Renate Holzeisen, Italian attorney engaged in the
defense of the Human Rights, said in an interview for an Italian radio.
“This could be a milestone” said Reiner Fuellmich during the Corona Committee 113, interviewing Renate Holzeisen.
No obligation as the official data show that these
experimental substances don’t prevent infection and transmission amongst
people treated with 3 or more Covid shots.
First of all, the judge declares that based on the datas published by the Ministry of Health, AIFA
(Italian Medicines Agency) and the SSN (Italian Health Services), it is
very clear that these substances (aka Covid vaccines), defined several
times by the judge as “experimental”, don’t prevent infection from the
virus. For a mandatory vaccination, the substances should be proven to
work.
Therefore, as they don’t work, in front of the Italian law, there can not be an obligation.
Doctor leading the intensive care in Verona has declared in
television that all Covid patients in intensive care are people treated
with 3 Covid shots.
Nobody can be forced to be injected as these substances
provoke severe adverse events and this is based on official public data
regarding adverse events.
In the court decision,
the judge also recognises that these substances cause very serious side
effects that can even lead to death, and also refers to the risk of
genetic mutation.
Therefore, it even less legitimate to force anybody to be injected.
The judge declared that you cannot sacrifice life and health of an
individual for the benefit of the population, but based on the public
data coming from the Italian and European health authority, there is
evidence that, at the end, there isn’t even a benefit for the community.
The Dignity of the human being is at the centre. Mandatory
vaccination is not possible because there is NO informed consent due to
industrial and alleged military secret regarding the ingredients and the
mechanism of these injections.
Even if these substances would work to prevent these infection, after
the Nazi and fascism period, it can not be a mandatory without an
informed consent.
The judge stated that there is no benefit for these substances BUT
even if there was a benefit, we can not sacrifice the individual right
in the name of the common interest, and put the dignity of the human
being at the centre.
The judge referred twice to the Nazi and fascism period, to the
Italian Constitution article 32 highlighting that there is a reason why
Dignity is at the centre of the first article of the German
constitution.
She explained that an informed consent is not possible as we don’t
know the ingredients and the mechanisms of these substances (industrial
and alleged military secret).
We should recall a group of Human Rights Italian activists who
presented a Freedom of Information Act to the EMA and to the Italian
Cares Authority asking for clear informations about the ingredients and
the safety of these experimental substances aka Covid injections. As an
answer, the EMA said that no information can be shared as there is a
military secret in place.
In his decision, the judge stated it: no information are available
about these substances and even if we ask for information publicly, we
don’t receive it. There is no informed consent.
In this historic decision, the Tuscan judge concluded that based on
all these, the discrimination of this psychologist and her suspension
from work is totally illegal. Even before hearing the other part
(Tuscany’s Chamber of Psychologists), because of the ongoing
irreversible damage the plaintiff suffered and because of the clear
evidence, she suspended the decision of the Tuscany’s Chamber of
Psychologists to suspend the plaintiff and fixed a court hearing for 15th September.
But the judge showed as well that there is no need to go to the
constitutional court as we know that these substances (aka Covid-19
vaccine) don’t prevent infection. In front of the Italian law regarding
mandatory Covid vaccination, it is enough to say the suspension from
labour of healthcare workers is illegitimate because these substances
don’t do what the constitution request.
Mandatory vaccination for many other categories of workers (teachers,
fireworkers, military-members, policemen etc.) was already foreseen and
for the citizen over 50 years the mandatory vaccination is still in
force.
This is the first decision with which an Italian judge
declared the material truth and the imposition of the treatment is
radically illegitimate.
———————
READ the Court Decision Here.
WATCH Renate Holzeisen with Reiner Fuellmich at the Corona Auschuss 113 here.
“Legal success in Italy: Emergency appeal granted, injections classified as experimental”
Stiftung Corona Ausschuss – Session 113