WHO, pandemic preparedness and world takeover

Before the World Health Assembly meeting last week, Dr. David Bell provided an excellent explanation of the WHO, pandemic preparedness and the pending proposals and still-being-negotiated treaty.

https://brownstone.org/articles/a-primer-on-the-who-the-treaty-and-its-plans-for-pandemic-preparedness/

The meeting ended two days ago.  Many of the amendments proposed by the US and about 30 supporters were withdrawn during the meeting.  A simple majority of nations was not yet ready to vote to surrender their sovereignty in the event of an undefined pandemic.

Not this week.  More coming, stay tuned.

IMHO, the best way to avoid this particular disaster is simply to tell the truth about the lack of meaningful work of the WHO, whose raison d'etre seems to be vaccinations. And bad advice regarding pandemics.

 

What is the FDA planning for more vaccine authorizations in June? Toby Rogers explains

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/fda-announces-updated-schedule-for?utm_source=%2Finbox&utm_medium=reader2&s=r

FDA announces updated schedule for the June meetings regarding five pivotal vaccine decisions

Who needs data when you've got regulatory capture?

Toby Rogers

May 29

I. The June FDA meetings

This week the Washington Post copied and pasted from a Pfizer press release to announce yet another scientific miracle(TM) that will completely fail in practice. In the process WaPo also got some quotes from the FDA who have now nailed down the schedule for the 4 meetings in June in which they intend to assemble the final pieces for Pharma’s permanent dominance over the American people.

The new schedule is as follows:

June 7, Novavax 
June 14, Moderna in kids 6 to 17 years old
June 15, Moderna in kids 6 months to 5 years AND Pfizer in kids 6 months to 4 years
June 28, “Future Framework” (the plan to skip clinical trials in perpetuity)

There is a lot to parse in the WaPo’s brief article.

Contrary to the breathless headline, they still don’t have any data. 

Pfizer and BioNTech said the 80 percent efficacy finding was preliminary and based on 10 cases of Covid-19 in the study population as of the end of April. Once 21 cases have occurred, the companies will conduct a more formal analysis of efficacy... Pfizer and BioNTech said they plan to finish filing data with the FDA this week — and warned that the efficacy number was fluid because results are still arriving.

Let’s recap how we got here:

🚩 The Pfizer clinical trial in kids under 5 failed in December 2021.

🚩 So Pfizer added a third dose and that trial also apparently failed in February (which is why Pfizer was forced to withdraw its application on February 10).

🚩 Now Pfizer is describing a jerry-rigged trial of a third dose in 1,678 kids ages 6 months to four years old. Pfizer did not disclose how the kids were divided between the treatment and control group so it is impossible to run our own calculations on efficacy. Out of that sample, 10 developed Covid — although it is not clear how the 10 were distributed between the treatment and control group. (I suppose some quant on Twitter will figure out how to work backwards from Pfizer’s claims to calculate the numbers in each of these categories but needless to say, this is not the proper way to do science.) Of course Pfizer also failed to describe the contents of the “placebo.”

As always with “publication by press release” the announcement raised more questions than answers:

• “the efficacy finding was preliminary”; just 10 cases; “the companies will conduct a more formal analysis” next month; “the efficacy number was fluid because results are still arriving” — so you’re saying that these numbers are NOT statistically significant and in fact you have no valid “results” at all? Got it.

• How exactly will Pfizer double the number of Covid-19 cases in the clinical trial in the next month given that 74.2% of kids already had natural immunity in February which means that nearly 100% of children likely have natural immunity by now?

• Also, is the FDA seriously considering basing national policy, that impacts 18 million children, by relying on a study with only 10 cases? It appears that the FDA is not even pretending to care about science anymore.

What’s perhaps most troubling about this so-called clinical trial is that Pfizer is NOT looking at health outcomes in the real world (because there are none). Instead, all of their claims are based on antibodies in the blood. That’s strange because the members of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee unanimously acknowledged on April 6 that there are “no correlates of protection” in connection with Covid-19 shots (this means that there are no valid proxy measures, such as antibody counts, that can determine whether someone who has received this shot is immune to the virus or not.)

WaPo dutifully copied Pfizer’s disingenuous description:

While the adult trials recruited tens of thousands of volunteers and waited to see if vaccinated people were better protected, the children’s vaccine trials were primarily designed to measure immune responses using blood tests. 

No they were not “primarily designed to measure immune responses using blood tests.” The studies were intentionally undersized to hide harms from the shots in addition to other tricks that they use to skew the results (such as kicking you out of the trial if you call 911 or go to the emergency room). But when one shrinks the sample size, surprise! it becomes impossible to detect actual health benefits from the shots (the signal would have been tiny if at all, but when one uses a sample that small then any positive signal can also disappear into statistical insignificance.)...

Click here for the full report

 

Journalist, trained attorney and activist Shabam Palesa Mohamed of South Africa covers the WHA meeting and related events

 https://shabnampalesamohamed.substack.com/p/africa-objects-to-us-proposal-on?s=r

Africa objects to US proposal on controversial IHR amendments

Meanwhile India discovers irregularities in WHO financial audit

Africa Day, 25 May, has made an impact. In a rare show of African power and solidarity, several African member states objected to proposed International Health Regulations amendments, discussed at the World Health Assembly 75 this week - a move many believe might shake up the World Health Organization's dominance.

A well placed source shared: “The resolution on IHR amendments was not passed at the WHA, as African countries were concerned that there was inadequate consultation amongst member states, and the process was being rushed. Botswana read the statement on behalf of the 47 AFRO members and I was personally present.”

According to Reuters, “if Africa continues to withhold support, it could block one of the only concrete reforms expected from the meeting, fraying hopes that members will unite on reforms to strengthen the U.N. health agency's rules as it seeks a central role for itself in global health policy...”

Click here for the rest.

Moneypox Biowar Smoking Guns?/ Kevin Barrett

Do not miss this discussion of drills morphing into reality, companies being saved by biowarfare events, and more--Meryl

https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/monkeypox-biowar-smoking-guns

An incendiary conversation with HelenOfDestroy

Kevin Barrett May 28

Watch the full uncensored False Flag Weekly News on Rumble; click HERE for links to the stories under discussion

By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

My “COVID-19 Bioattack Smoking Gun” video with Ron Unz has passed 170,000 views. Since a key COVID-19 bio-attack suspect, Robert Kadlec, is also implicated in the monkeypox monkey business, let’s consider several possible smoking guns—discussed during the first segment of this week’s False Flag Weekly News—casting the monkeypox scare as yet another deliberately staged event emanating from the US wing of the biological warfare community.

The biggest COVID-19 smoking gun, as discussed in the Unz video, is the DIA memo proving US intelligence foreknowledge of the incipient pandemic in Wuhan before the virus could have possibly been noticed by anyone but the perpetrators. As Ron Unz writes in his American Pravda: Our Coronavirus Catastrophe as Biowarfare Blowback? ebook: 

It therefore appears that elements of the Defense Intelligence Agency were aware of the deadly viral outbreak in Wuhan more than a month before any officials in the Chinese government itself. Unless our intelligence agencies have pioneered the technology of precognition, I think this may have happened for the same reason that arsonists have the earliest knowledge of future fires.

Another indication of COVID foreknowledge is the Crimson Contagion exercise, run by Trump’s then biowar czar Robert Kadlec. Quoting again from the Unz ebook:

From the earliest days of the administration, leading Trump officials had regarded China as America’s most formidable geopolitical adversary, and orchestrated a policy of confrontation. Then from January to August 2019, Kadlec’s department ran the “Crimson Contagion” simulation exercise, involving the hypothetical outbreak of a dangerous respiratory viral disease in China, which eventually spreads into the United States, with the participants focusing on the necessary measures to control it in this country. As one of America’s foremost biowarfare experts, Kadlec had emphasized the unique effectiveness of bioweapons as far back as the late 1990s and we must commend him for his considerable prescience in having organized a major viral epidemic exercise in 2019 that was so remarkably similar to what actually began in the real world just a few months later.

Kadlec’s “prescience” becomes even more remarkable in light of the fact that he not only saw COVID coming and organized a set of major exercises rehearsing the US response just months ahead of the actual outbreak, but more recently has also profited from a monkeypox panic that was similarly foreseen in “precognitive” exercises. Kadlec, the world’s foremost proponent of biological warfare as a deniable means of targeting enemy economies, is a business associate and crony of Fuad El-Hibri, founder of Bioport (now called Emergent Biosolution), one of the two companies offering products to protect against monkeypox. Bioport/Emergent saw its stock value soar in the wake of the monkeypox panic, as reported by Whitney Webb. The company appears to have been saved from ruination by monkeypox; it had been about to lose its federal contracts, a sure path to bankruptcy for a company whose only client is the federal government, due to COVID vaccine quality-control problems when, as if by magic, monkeypox arrived to save the day.

And monkeypox arrived in the nick of time, on the exact day it had been envisioned to arrive in exercises conducted one year earlier. As reported byChildrens Health Defense:

In March 2021, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), in conjunction with the Munich Security Conference, held a “tabletop exercise on reducing high-consequence biological threats.”

This “fictional exercise scenario” involved the simulation of “a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that first emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months.” … The fictional start date of the monkeypox pandemic in this exercise was May 15, 2022.

Google, the ultimate arbiter of truth about everything, tells us the real-world monkeypox epidemic began on May 14, 2022:

The news about the May 14 UKHSA report was widely reported in mainstream media on May 15. So the fictional start date of the monkeypox epidemic in the March 2021 NTI exercise, May 15, 2022, somehow became the real-world start date of the real-world monkeypox epidemic a little over a year after the exercise had envisioned that very thing happening on that very date. Needless to day, coincidence theorists are having a field day.

The timing becomes even more suspicious when considered in light of the WHO holding its much ballyhooed (and much-protested) World Health Assembly exactly one week later on May 22. The WHO is trying to push through a Global Pandemic Treaty that will institute a Global Vaccine Passport and override national sovereignty to impose a one-size-fits-all globalist response to future pandemics. As The Washington Post reported, the WHO is facing “a visceral, passionate online backlash that falsely accuses the World Health Organization of conspiring to take power from national governments.” To overcome that backlash, from the WHO’s viewpoint, it would certainly be helpful to have a new global pandemic, complete with ominpresent images of hideous fear-inducing pustules erupting from human skin, to panic populations into seeing the urgent need for a global pandemic treaty, even at the expense of the minor sacrifice of such small matters as personal liberty and national sovereignty. (Join the movement against the pandemic treaty HERE.)

Were any pro-Global Pandemic Treaty actors involved in the NTI’s tabletop monkeypox exercises that predicted the exact day of the outbreak? Coincidentally, yes. Again citing Childrens Health Defense:

“Key participants included:

• Dr. Ruxandra Draghia-Akli, global head of Johnson & Johnson Global Public Health R&D and Janssen Research & Development.

• Dr. Chris Elias, president of the global development division of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

• Dr. George Gao, director-general of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (the Chinese CDC).

• Dr. Margaret (Peggy) A. Hamburg, interim vice president for global biological policy and programs at NTI, a member of the global health scientific advisory committee for the Gates Foundation and a member of the board of GAVI-The Vaccine Alliance.

• Sam Nunn, a former U.S. senator who is the founder and co-chair of NTI.

• Dr. Michael Ryan, executive director of the WHO Health Emergencies Program and a highly visible figure during COVID-19 times.

• Dr. Petra Wicklandt, head of corporate affairs for Merck.

Several of the participants listed above also “participated” in Event 201.”

Event 201, you will remember—like Crimson Contagion—was a drill that envisioned a COVID-like pandemic emerging from China. And like Crimson Contagion, Event 201 was held during the run-up to the real-life COVID outbreak that it predicted and practiced for.

“Drills Gone Live”

The prescient drills that mimicked the COVID and monkeypox scares are just two examples of a much more widespread phenomenon: disaster drills that “go live.” September 11, 2001, the most notable example, was the biggest pre-scheduled National Security Special Event Day in all of US history, vastly outdoing its most important forerunner, Operation Skyshield of the early 1960s, which similarly involved multiple air defense drills and the shutting down of all civilian air traffic. 9/11 was much bigger than Operation Skyshield, of course, involving no fewer than 46 drills and terror exercises, including a live fly plane-into-building exercise that evacuated the National Reconnaissance Office and prevented NRO personnel from monitoring satellite feeds showing what was really going on with the allegedly hijacked planes. Among the 46 drills of 9/11, more than two dozen of which happened on the day itself, were exercises that involved inserting false blips on FAA radar screens to confuse and mislead air controllers. That is why FAA controllers reacted to the news of hijackings by asking “Is this real-world or exercise?” (The correct answer, of course, was “Both A and B.”)

Another pair of drills that went live shortly after 9/11 were “Dark Winter,” the June 2001 bioterror exercise which morphed into the late-September 2001 anthrax attacks, and Tripod 2, which brought a huge FEMA contingent to New York City on September 10, 2001 to role-play a bioterror attack scheduled for September 12. These two drills set the stage for the anthrax attacks of late September, 2001. For evidence that the same perpetrators orchestred both 9/11 and the anthrax letters, read Barbara Honegger’s “The Scarlet A” and Graeme MacQueen’s The 2001 Anthrax Deception.

Interestingly, the Robert Kadlec-linked company Bioport, which as earlier noted was just rescued by monkeypox, was similarly saved from bankruptcy in 2001 by the anthrax attacks. As Whitney Webb explains:

BioPort stood to lose the Pentagon contracts – its only source of income. The Pentagon began preparing a report, due to be released in September 2001, that would detail a plan for letting BioPort go. Thanks to the September 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon, that report was never released. Shortly thereafter, the 2001 anthrax attacks began.

Just months before, BioPort had contracted Battelle Memorial Institute to help rescue its flailing vaccine program. The deal gave Battelle “immediate exposure to the vaccine” and it was used in connection with the Pentagon-funded, gain-of-function anthrax program that involved both Ken Alibek and William C. Patrick III, two bioweapons experts with deep ties to the CIA. That program was housed at Battelle’s West Jefferson facility in Ohio. That facility is believed by many investigators to be the source of the anthrax used in the 2001 attacks. 

Webb notes that Robert Kadlec ran the Dark Winter exercise that prefigured the anthrax attack, and also served as top Pentagon bioterror advisor during the run-up to the attack. Kadlec’s checkered career raises the question: If it takes chutzpah to attack your own people, and the world, with biological weapons, how much more chutzpah does it take to do it repeatedly as an undisguised serial biowar criminal, bailing out your failing companies, one after another, by unleashing plagues on the public?

7/7/2005: “Drills Gone Live” Participant Inadvertently Confesses

Just as 9/11-anthrax rode in on the back of drills and exercises, the same is true of the false flag London transit bombing of July 7, 2005. The Muslim patsies were informed they were taking part in a drill, and were given backpacks and told which tube trains and busses to catch at which times. Unfortunately for the real perpetrators, the patsies missed their first train, throwing the official story into chaos and disrepute and forcing the perps to scramble to locate and eliminate the patsies, as explained in Nick Kollerstrom’s Terror on the Tube and the film 7/7 Ripple Effect.

A key organizer of the drills that “went live” on 7/7/2005 was Peter Power, head of Visor Consultants, which had been hired to participate in the drills that miraculously envisaged bombs going off at the exact times and places that the real bombs went off.

What explains the drill-goes-live phenomenon? Webster Tarpley writes that the moles inside military and intelligence organizations who organize false flag terror events can meticulously organize their crimes without arousing the suspicion of colleagues who may not be involved (like Peter Power?) by framing them as drills. Additionally, drills rehearse the actual responses of the majority non-criminal element of government agencies, which can then be anticipated and to some extent controlled by the perpetrators. 

But is it really necessary to make such things so thunderingly obvious to the whole world? How much gall must these people have to expose their crimes in such a baldfaced way, by rehearsing them ahead of time and sometimes even telling the world the exact date that their fabricated disaster will happen? Are they gambling that public outrage will not eventually break out of media containment and lead to an uprising, or at least a series of vigilante actions, that will topple them from their thrones of wealth and power and hasten them to the kind of ignonimous ends that they have imposed on such adversaries as Saddam Hussein and Mu’ammar Qaddafi?

Here's what you should know about the latest Money Pox

Smallpox, money pox, and the vaccines they will try to frighten you into receiving

The WHO released a clever statement to introduce the idea of mass money pox vaccination to the public:

The World Health Organization (WHO) maintains that the growing monkeypox outbreak remains "containable," and that there's no immediate need for mass vaccination against the orthopoxvirus; since May 7, a total of 131 confirmed cases and 106 suspected cases have been reported in countries where it usually does not spread. (Reuters)

No immediate need. Let that statement ferment in your unconscious. It seems like a benign sentence, but implicit in it is the idea that soon there may well be a need to mass vaccinate the population against money pox, a disease that has never before spread due to casual contact.

I don’t think we even know the actual mortality rate for money pox. Has a westerner ever died from it?

Could this possibly be the same money pox that occurs in Africa? If so, how did it suddenly appear in so many countries at once? This fact alone—its novel, never-before-seen pattern of spread, should make us question whether it is a biowarfare agent being seeded deliberately. Probably not meant to kill us, maybe not even to harm us much. We can’t tell yet, based on the minimalist info coming out of our esteemed public health agencies. Perhaps it’s here just to nudge us to get another shot?

Below I give you the basics on smallpox, monkeypox and the newest vaccines coming to a clinic near you:

1.  If there is a money pox vaccine (and FDA has apparently approved one that the army helped develop) it has not been tested for efficacy, because there have not been enough human cases to do so.

• Efficacy testing requires that you vaccinate people and then see how many cases of the disease occur in the vaccinated versus the placebo group. If you were able to vaccinate a million people but disease frequency was such that you couldn’t even get a handful of cases occuring, you cannot perform an efficacy test.

• Instead, in order to get vaccines approved or authorized, antibody tests are done that are claimed to demonstrate the presence of immunity. But oft times (as in the COVID or anthrax vaccines) the antibody that is selected for this purpose may not be a reliable indicator of immunity…as admitted at the booster VRBPAC meeting by FDA staff and committee members.

2.  The smallpox vaccine is said to be 85% effective against monkeypox...but without many human monkeypox cases, that 85% number cannot possibly have been established.

3.   The smallpox vaccine causes a huge number of myocarditis cases and other known cardiac problems, making it almost certainly more dangerous than the risk of getting monkeypox. One in 220 recipients developed an obvious case of myocarditis in a US military study published in 2015, and one in 30 got a subclinical case.

Why would ANYONE take such a high risk of cardiac damage to avoid a miniscule risk of money pox? Only because they were misinformed.

4.  Smallpox vaccine, when used routinely in babies, was considered the most dangerous vaccine available. It led to the deaths of several people per million administrations.

5.  I received smallpox vaccines in 1951 and 1972 and believe I had insignificant reactions.  I expect I am fully immune to smallpox.  Tests done in people in 2003 published in NEJM suggested immunity was lifelong.

6.  The US smallpox vaccine last used routinely in civilians was the NY Department of Health version, and it was made similarly to the vaccine of the 1700s.  Infectious fluid from a related orthopox virus was scratched on the belly of a calf, and then when new vesicles developed the material was collected as the vaccine substrate, and could only be minimally purified.

7.  Ever wonder why the smallpox vaccine is scratched on while all others are injected? Because it was so dirty, contaminated with other animal viruses and unspecified materials, which might cause a serious infection if injected beyond the skin.

8.  It was hoped, 20-30 years ago, that a newer, cleaner, purified vaccine would avoid the many severe side effects. Two newer vaccines (ACAM 2000, purified from the NY DOH Dryvax vaccine and MVA) were purchased by the Clinton and Bush administrations for all Americans.  It turned out, unfortunately, that the cardiac side effects persisted.  They were due to the actual vaccine antigen, not to the 'junk.' The MVA (Modified Vaccinia Ankara) vaccine, which is less reactogenic but may be less effective than ACAM2000, had its US name changed to Jynneos, and has now been designated the official MoneyPox vaccine.

Regarding ACAM2000 and the licensing of Jynneos, FDA said in 2019 (on page 4):

ACAM2000 is contraindicated for use in individuals with severe immunodeficiency who are not expected to benefit from the vaccine… In 2003, a monkeypox
outbreak was confirmed in the U.S. This was the first time human monkeypox was
reported outside of the African continent. (Not true but close—Nass) Currently, there is no approved treatment
or licensed vaccine for monkeypox, although the Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that ACAM2000 be used for prevention of monkeypox in individuals at high risk of exposure (e.g., lab workers who handle monkeypox virus). Thus, there is an unmet need for a monkeypox vaccine.

9.  The US government initiated a smallpox vaccine program in 2003 that rapidly failed—people refused to be vaccinated due to high rates of heart attacks, heart failure and myocarditis. The National Academies of Science (NAS) wrote a series of about 8 critical “Letter Reports” on the government program, and the magazine Science wrote about the final report here. However, both the NAS and Science pulled their punches, failing the fully emphasize the dangers and to reflect the widespread skepticism about the program, which used a dangerous vaccine for a nonexistent or at least unproven threat.

10. According to Medpage, CDC says both Jynneos and ACAM2000 vaccines will be available to respond to the money pox event. Yet even CDC currently admits that the chance of myocarditis is huge (greater than one in 200 vaccine recipients) from the ACAM2000 vaccine, in an MMWR from November 2021:

Because ACAM2000 is replication-competent, there is a risk for serious adverse events (e.g., progressive vaccinia and eczema vaccinatum) with it; myopericarditis also occurs with ACAM2000 (estimated rate of 5.7 per 1,000 primary vaccinees based on clinical trial data), but the underlying mechanism is unknown (7,8).

11. From the same MMWR article , the CDC perhaps inadvertently admitted it had no reliable evidence for either safety or efficacy:

The effectiveness of JYNNEOS was inferred from the immunogenicity of JYNNEOS in clinical studies and from efficacy data from animal challenge studies. [But humans do not necessarily respond the same as lab animals—Nass] Occurrences of serious adverse events are expected to be minimal because JYNNEOS is a replication-deficient virus vaccine. However, because the mechanism for myopericarditis following receipt of ACAM2000 is thought to be an immune-mediated phenomenon, it is not known whether the antigen or antigens that precipitate autoantibodies [causing myocarditis or other adverse events—Nass] are present in JYNNEOS as well.

Later down, CDC admits again that it has no idea what it is doing with the Jynneos vaccine:

Because a correlate of protection has not been established and there is no known antibody titer level that will ensure protection, titer results should be interpreted with caution in such cases to avoid providing a false sense of security.

12. Despite knowing there is virtually no reliable information about how the vaccine might prevent monkeypox nor how safe it is, the Quebec government has begun rolling out the vaccine for the prevention of money pox. According to CBC:

…the smallpox vaccine — which hasn't been routinely offered in Canada for decades — will be offered to those at high risk of contracting the disease, such as those who have been in contact with confirmed cases.

[Quebec’s top health officer] Boileau said the province has access to hundreds of doses at the ready, but vaccination will only occur after a recommendation from public health. It will not be open to the general public.

13. Whitney Webb wrote last week about two of the Beltway Bandits poised to make yet another killing on money pox, Emergent BioSolutions and SIGA Technologies.

I will be adding to this post.

MONEY Pox May 28. I explain why the Daily Mail "everything you need to know" claims are unsupportable

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10826157/Q-deadly-monkeypox-cure-treated-worried-be.html

SEE MY COMMENTS IN BOLDED BLUE--NASS

EVERYTHING you need to know about monkeypox: Strain 'transmits through sex' and is about as deadly as the Wuhan Covid variant — but a vaccine does exist

• Seven cases in UK could be tip of iceberg as health chiefs hunt for common link 
• First time ever spreading in community and appears to be transmitting via sex -- NEW MODES OF TRANSMISSION IN A VERY SLOW-MUTATING DNA VIRUS ARE ESSENTIALLY UNHEARD OF
  
• Can kill one in 10 but milder strain is transmitting in UK, which kills one in 100--THE AUTHORITIES HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE MORTALITY RATE IS BECAUSE THERE HAVE BEEN SO FEW CASES IN THE WEST AND I HAVE NOT HEARD OF A REPORTED DEATH YET.
  

Moneypox appears to be spreading globally for the first time in an outbreak that has caught health officials off-guard.--MONEY POX DOES NOT SPREAD GLOBALLY,  NEVER HAS, SO IF IT SUDDENLY CHANGED ITS MODE OF SPREAD, THAT IS STRONG EVIDENCE FOR AN ENGINEERED ORIGIN.

The UK has recorded seven cases of the virus but the majority of them are not linked which suggests more are going undetected.  THERE HAVE NEVER BEEN UNLINKED CASES.  IS THERE A NEW ACE-2 RECEPTOR, FURIN CLEAVAGE SITE OR OTHER MECHANISM(S) INTRODUCED TO ENABLE AIRBORNE SPREAD?

Spain and Portugal have also spotted the virus for the first time ever and the US is monitoring six people who were on a flight with a positive case. IF IT TRANSMITS VIA SEX, THEN IT OUGHT NOT TRANMIT VIA AIRPLANES (WHICH INVOLVES TRANSMISSION VIA OBJECTS OR AIR).

Portuguese officials have confirmed five men tested positive and over a dozen more are thought to be infected. HOW ARE CASES BEING CONFIRMED?  IF MONEY POX HAS MUTATED, THEN EXISTING PCR TESTS ARE LIKELY TO NO LONGER BE ACCURATE.

Health chiefs in the UK say the pattern of transmission is 'highly suggestive of spread in sexual networks'.

Until now monkeypox had only been detected in four countries outside of Africa — the UK, US, Israel and Singapore, all of whom had links to Nigeria and Ghana.  SO WHAT HAPPENED SUDDENLY ?

Infections are more common in central and western Africa, where they can result from direct contact with infected animals. THIS IS WHERE MONKEYS AND RODENTS ARE USUAL PARTS OF THE DIET.

Monkeypox can kill up to one in 10 people it infects — but the strain spreading globally is milder and has a fatality rate of about one in 100.  It is impossible to know the fatality rate until you can reliably count the number of cases and number of deaths--until you are able to do that with thousands of cases these numbers are speculation or fearmongering.

That is roughly the same as the first strain of Covid that came out of Wuhan, however vaccines and natural immunity have since made the coronavirus much weaker.  What is the fatality rate of COVID?  Probably 0.15-0.25% but because few of the datasets reliably adjudicate cases, the COVID mortality rate is still not clear.  Do NOT worry about dying from money pox.  We have no idea if money pox is any worse than chicken pox, from which about one (severely immunocompromised) American per year dies.

Monkeypox's similarity to smallpox means jabs and drugs against that virus are also effective...  However, no evidence has been offered to prove this.  Do not get sucked into taking a dangerous smallpox jab that is unproven to prevent money pox.

 

The Great Reset: What they've done, and strategies for stopping it. My talk at the Northern Light/Scandinavian Freedom Event in Malmo

Here is a link that allows you  to watch my presentation at Malmo.

 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jl0hSUr0HxIEwoJZ6GNiEcm4G2AXQxF1/view

Latest Uvalde Update, with new information on how the last two US mass shootings were linked contemporaneously with the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2021, HR 350 as well as gun control

1.  Normal people have no interest in killing children, especially ones they do not know, especially in large numbers.

2.  In my view, only people subject to mind control (please investigate Sirhan Sirhan or read about US intelligence agency attempts to create mind controlled assassins beginning in the 1950s) or people taking certain drugs, or special trained assassins are even capable of carrying out such an act.  [In the case of Sirhan Sirhan, who did fire wildly on a crowd, but did not kill Kennedy, the actual assassin was an intelligence asset.]  From the WaPo in 2018:

Though Sirhan admitted at his trial in 1969 that he shot Kennedy, he claimed from the start that he had no memory of doing so. And midway through Sirhan’s trial, prosecutors provided his lawyers with an autopsy report that launched five decades of controversy: Kennedy was shot at point-blank range from behind, including a fatal shot behind his ear. But Sirhan, a 24-year-old Palestinian immigrant, was standing in front of him.

3.  School shootings are the most provocative and effective way to initiate a change in gun laws, which means taking away the guns from some or all of the people who privately own them.

4.  The large number of American gun owners pose a daunting challenge to the globalists who wish to control them.  Police and military will not be willing to enter the homes of gun owners to remove their guns or for other purposes.

5.  Few Europeans, Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders own guns, and it is believed by many that the imposition of much harsher lockdowns on the citizens of these nations, compared to the US, was enabled by this fact.

6.  There have been shortages of guns and ammunition in the US since the onset of the pandemic.  Whether this is due to supply-demand, including increased purchases by the federal government, or to other market forces, is not clear. 

7.  There has been very little exploration into the past history of those who committed mass murders in the US in recent years, especially in schools.  I want to know if any or all of these mass murderers may have been enrolled in black mind control projects.

8.  I want a full accounting of the mind control programs paid for with taxpayer dollars in the US and elsewhere.

9.  I want an investigation into the many thousands of self-reported "targeted individuals" (TIs) who complain of voices beamed into their heads and other forms of what can only be termed torture.

10.  I want an investigation into the implants some of these people claim were introduced into their bodies.

11.  A reader sent me this piece by David Swanson, revealing that at least a third of mass US shooters have been trained in the US military.  Were they put through mind control programs while serving their country?

12.  Why have so many assassins and mass shooters appeared to be in an altered state of consciousness immediately after the event, and/or at other times?  Think Sirhan Sirhan, Mark David Chapman, Reagan's attempted assassin whose father was having dinner with GHW Bush the week of the attempt?  Has anyone analyzed their behaviors systematically? Their histories and connections to the powerful?

13.  We are being attacked in many perverse ways, and we must open our eyes, and take our power back, or the attacks will continue and will destroy us.

UPDATES:  On May 29, the WaPo reveals that Uvalde police had as recently as 2 months earlier been trained to go in on the shooter asap. It further says the head of the school police contingent isn't talking.  There is a simple question that probably every officer there is capable of answering:  who was the incident commander?  Who gave the orders?

Since the Columbine school massacre in 1999, many police departments have trained officers to go after an attacker as soon as possible, to minimize the number of teachers and children shot. Before then, guidance often emphasized waiting for specially trained tactical officers with specialized equipment.

In March 2022, the school district police hosted active shooter training at Uvalde High School, according to a post on the agency’s Facebook page. “Our overall goal is to train every Uvalde area law enforcement officer so that we can prepare as best as possible for any situation that may arise,” the post said.

The state-mandated course curriculum advises that, “In the event of an active school attack, school-based law enforcement officers should do the best they can to fill the gap until other first responders can arrive.” An arriving officer’s “first priority is to move in and confront the attacker,” even if that officer has to act alone, the guidance says...

On May 28, we learn that the shooter was alive in the building for 90 minutes.  That the janitor had a key to the room where he had locked himself in. That 20 local police officers were in the school... waiting... for a very long time, over an hour it seems.  

Despite earlier hints at negotiations, today we learn the gunman had no demands and it seems negotiations were proffered as an excuse to explain the massive time lapse before police acted.

Who told them to wait?  What was the plan? Twenty police officers could have obtained to lots of protective equipment during 90 minutes.  They could have tazed or sprayed or fentanyl'd the alleged murderer. 

Finally a special squad arrived, the door was unlocked, and the alleged mass murderer was executed.  His grandmother, shot in the face, survived.

Scroll below to learn how a bill on domestic terrorism and political posturing about gun control were temporally related to the Buffalo mass shooting and this one.

The May 27 Update:  Even the Washington Post, a CIA rag owned by Jeff Bezos who also has the CIA cloud contract, could not keep the news of the bizarre, if not criminal, behavior of law enforcement at Uvalde quiet. Per the WaPo:

The shooter was “not confronted by anybody” as he walked into Robb Elementary School, a regional director of the Texas Department of Public Safety said at a news conference Thursday, contradicting officials’ earlier statements that an officer “engaged” the shooter beforehand. Officers arrived four minutes after the gunman entered the school, the regional director said, but remained outside the classroom until a heavily armed tactical team arrived about an hour in…

and from another WaPo update:

Authorities say 18-year-old Salvador Rolando Ramos’s rampage in Uvalde, Tex., began late Tuesday morning when he shot his grandmother in the face and drove her truck toward Robb Elementary School. He crashed close to school grounds and shot at two people nearby before going on foot to Robb, a state public safety official said Thursday.

Texas public safety officials initially said Ramos stormed the school despite encountering a school police officer and offered conflicting information about whether the two exchanged gunfire. But Victor Escalon Jr., South Texas regional director for the state Department of Public Safety, said at a news conference Thursday that officials’ early reports were wrong and that Ramos was not challenged as he entered.

Ramos “walked in unobstructed,” he said. Interviews, video and emergency line audio show how about an hour passed before officers stopped the gunman.

Yet another live WaPo update, after a vague discussion of the possibility that “negotiations” look place during the hour in which the shooter was active inside the school, relates:

Authorities confirmed Thursday that the gunman spent about an hour inside the school before officers from a tactical team got into a classroom and shot him. Meanwhile, parents outside pleaded with officers to let them in so they could save their children, according to videos from the scene.

“The people of Uvalde, of Texas, and of the nation deserve an accurate account of what transpired,” [Congressmember] Castro wrote.

I have not included information covered in alternative media indicating that an active shooter exercise was done at the Robb school in Uvalde 2 months earlier. Whether or not that is true, I think everyone can agree that there is absolutely no acceptable explanation for police to fail to engage an active shooter in an elementary school for one hour while keeping parents out—especially since the alleged shooter was eventually killed by police, and was known to have killed his grandmother before driving to the school.

I don’t know if the shooter was drugged, mind controlled, a trained assassin, or something else. What I do know is that police grossly failed to do their duty. Other adults were prevented from entering, both to stop the carnage and be witnesses to what was occurring.

And widespread calls for gun control followed immediately after this dreadful massacre. Joe Biden and Greg Abbott are planning Uvalde photo-ops. From the NY Times:

WASHINGTON — After the deadliest school shooting in a decade, a small group of Republican and Democratic senators have begun an urgent and uphill effort to strike a compromise on new gun laws, voicing hope that a wave of collective outrage at the slaughter of 19 children and two teachers could finally conquer a decade of congressional paralysis.

But read on below. Not only gun control, but a domestic terrorism bill was riding the coat tails of the Uvalde massacre deaths of 19 children and two teachers.

How long will Americans allow such events to continue, without incising the abscess and understanding the pus at the root of school shootings?

____________

Below, I have reproduced the timeline Scott Creighton has posted of a Domestic Terrorism bill (HR350) that passed the house after the recent Buffalo, NY supermarket shooting, and was brought for a Senate for a vote right after the Uvalde shooting. The Senate rejected a cloture motion on a party line vote 47-47 yesterday.

“To authorize dedicated domestic terrorism offices within the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to analyze and monitor domestic terrorist activity and require the Federal Government to take steps to prevent domestic terrorism

Definitions

1. the term “domestic terrorism” has the meaning given the term in section 2331 of title 18, United States Code

(5) the term "domestic terrorism" means activities that—

(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

(B) appear to be intended—

(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or

(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

1. occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States; and

Authorizations

(a) Authorization of offices to monitor, analyze, investigate, and prosecute domestic terrorism.—

1. DOMESTIC TERRORISM UNIT.—There is authorized a Domestic Terrorism Unit in the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the Department of Homeland Security, which shall be responsible for monitoring and analyzing domestic terrorism activity.”

Timeline

01/06/2021 Demonstration at Capitol ('insurgency of 1/6')

01/19/2021 Introduced in House

(15 months pass)

04/21/2022 Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 117-292, Part I.

04/21/2022 Committee on Homeland Security discharged.

04/21/2022 Committee on Armed Services discharged.

(22 days pass)

05/14/2022 Buffalo Shooting (Tops market)

05/18/2022 Passed/agreed to in House

05/24/2022 Uvalde Shooting (Robb Elementary)(Motion to proceed in Senate) same day

05/26/2022 Brought to the floor for vote in Senate (cloture motion fails on party line vote)